Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, US.
School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, US.
Phys Sportsmed. 2021 May;49(2):123-129. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2020.1820846. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury. In active patients, it is routinely treated with ACL reconstruction surgery. Following reconstruction, one of the critical decisions that must be made is the optimal timing of return to sport. While many biomechanical, biological, and functional criteria have been proposed to determine return to play, these methods are limited at best. As criteria for return to play are multifactorial, there is a growing need for noninvasive technologies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to objectively track graft healing, to better assess the graft itself. Measuring the changes in the strength of the healing ligament has been shown to be a reliable means of objectively documenting graft healing in preclinical studies. While the initial studies of MR-based modeling of ACL graft healing are promising, this technology is still in its infancy and requires optimization. The goals of this review are: 1) to outline the shortcomings of current return to play criteria, 2) to highlight the ability of MRI to determine the status of ACL graft healing, and 3) to discuss the future of imaging technology to determine return to play and its potential role in the clinical evaluation of patients There continues to be a wide variabiltiy regarding adequate return to play criteria, most of which are subjective in nature.
前交叉韧带 (ACL) 的中断是一种常见的损伤。在活跃的患者中,通常采用 ACL 重建手术进行治疗。重建后,必须做出的一个关键决定是最佳的重返运动时间。虽然已经提出了许多生物力学、生物学和功能标准来确定重返赛场,但这些方法充其量是有限的。由于重返赛场的标准是多因素的,因此越来越需要磁共振成像 (MRI) 等非侵入性技术来客观地跟踪移植物愈合情况,以更好地评估移植物本身。研究表明,测量愈合韧带强度的变化是客观记录临床前研究中移植物愈合情况的可靠手段。虽然基于 MRI 的 ACL 移植物愈合模型的初步研究很有希望,但该技术仍处于起步阶段,需要进一步优化。本综述的目的是:1) 概述当前重返赛场标准的缺点,2) 强调 MRI 确定 ACL 移植物愈合状况的能力,3) 讨论成像技术的未来以确定重返赛场及其在患者临床评估中的潜在作用。关于充分的重返赛场标准仍然存在很大的差异,其中大多数标准都是主观的。