The Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Jun;20(2):163-79. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9212-1.
This systematic review was conducted to identify effective occupational health and safety interventions for small businesses.
The review focused on peer-reviewed intervention studies conducted in small businesses with 100 or fewer employees, that were published in English and several other languages, and that were not limited by publication date. Multidisciplinary members of the review team identified relevant articles and assessed their quality. Studies assessed as medium or high quality had data extracted, which was then synthesized.
Five studies were deemed of medium or high quality, and proceeded to data extraction and evidence synthesis. The types of interventions identified: a combination of training and safety audits; and a combination of engineering, training, safety audits, and a motivational component, showed a limited amount of evidence in improving safety outcomes. Overall, this evidence synthesis found a moderate level of evidence for intervention effectiveness, and found no evidence that any intervention had adverse effects.
Even though there were few studies that adequately evaluated small business intervention, several studies demonstrate that well-designed evaluations are possible with small businesses. While stronger levels of evidence are required to make recommendations, these interventions noted above were associated with positive changes in safety-related attitudes and beliefs and workplace parties should be aware of them.
本系统评价旨在确定针对小企业的有效职业健康和安全干预措施。
本评价重点关注在员工人数不超过 100 人的小企业中开展的同行评审干预研究,这些研究发表于英文和其他几种语言的期刊上,且不受出版日期限制。评价团队的多学科成员确定了相关文章,并对其质量进行了评估。被评估为中等到高质量的研究进行了数据提取,然后对其进行了综合分析。
有 5 项研究被认为具有中等到高质量,并进行了数据提取和证据综合。确定的干预措施类型包括:培训和安全审核相结合;以及工程、培训、安全审核和激励措施相结合,这些措施在改善安全结果方面的证据有限。总体而言,这项证据综合分析发现干预有效性的证据水平中等,且没有证据表明任何干预措施有不良影响。
尽管很少有研究充分评估了小企业干预措施,但有几项研究表明,对小企业进行精心设计的评估是可行的。虽然需要更强有力的证据来提出建议,但上述干预措施与安全相关态度和信念的积极变化有关,相关方应予以关注。