Suppr超能文献

提高数据访问的民主化程度和多样性可以促进科学的发展。

Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science.

机构信息

Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;

Energy & Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23490-23498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001682117. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Abstract

The foundation of the scientific method rests on access to data, and yet such access is often restricted or costly. We investigate how improved data access shifts the quantity, quality, and diversity of scientific research. We examine the impact of reductions in cost and sharing restrictions for satellite imagery data from NASA's Landsat program (the longest record of remote-sensing observations of the Earth) on academic science using a sample of about 24,000 Landsat publications by over 34,000 authors matched to almost 3,000 unique study locations. Analyses show that improved access had a substantial and positive effect on the quantity and quality of Landsat-enabled science. Improved data access also democratizes science by disproportionately helping scientists from the developing world and lower-ranked institutions to publish using Landsat data. This democratization in turn increases the geographic and topical diversity of Landsat-enabled research. Scientists who start using Landsat data after access is improved tend to focus on previously understudied regions close to their home location and introduce novel research topics. These findings suggest that policies that improve access to valuable scientific data may promote scientific progress, reduce inequality among scientists, and increase the diversity of scientific research.

摘要

科学方法的基础是获取数据,但这种获取往往受到限制或成本高昂。我们研究了数据获取的改善如何改变科学研究的数量、质量和多样性。我们使用大约 24000 篇由 34000 多名作者发表的 Landsat 论文样本,以及近 3000 个独特的研究地点,考察了美国宇航局 Landsat 计划(地球遥感观测时间最长的记录)卫星图像数据的成本降低和共享限制减少对学术科学的影响。分析表明,数据获取的改善对 Landsat 支持的科学的数量和质量产生了实质性的积极影响。改善的数据访问还通过使发展中国家和低排名机构的科学家能够使用 Landsat 数据发表论文,从而使科学民主化。这种民主化反过来又增加了 Landsat 支持的研究的地理和主题多样性。在数据获取改善后开始使用 Landsat 数据的科学家往往会关注其所在地附近以前研究较少的地区,并引入新的研究课题。这些发现表明,改善有价值科学数据获取的政策可能会促进科学进步,减少科学家之间的不平等,并增加科学研究的多样性。

相似文献

1
Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science.提高数据访问的民主化程度和多样性可以促进科学的发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23490-23498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001682117. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
The impact of landsat satellite monitoring on conservation biology.陆地卫星监测对保护生物学的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2005 Jul;106(1-3):81-101. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-0763-0.
5
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

6
Real-time genomics for One Health.实时基因组学在大健康领域的应用。
Mol Syst Biol. 2023 Aug 8;19(8):e11686. doi: 10.15252/msb.202311686. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science.科学学中的数据、度量和经验方法。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1046-1058. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01562-4. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdependence and the cost of uncoordinated responses to COVID-19.相互依存和应对 COVID-19 时缺乏协调的代价。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19837-19843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009522117. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Toward a more scientific science.迈向更科学的科学。
Science. 2018 Sep 21;361(6408):1194-1197. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2484.
6
The Matthew effect in science funding.科学基金中的马太效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):4887-4890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719557115. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Stop the privatization of health data.停止健康数据的私有化。
Nature. 2016 Jul 21;535(7612):345-8. doi: 10.1038/535345a.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验