• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将 ENIGMA 联盟中的大数据进行桥接,以结合非等效的认知测量方法。

Bridging big data in the ENIGMA consortium to combine non-equivalent cognitive measures.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72968-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-72968-x
PMID:39414844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484938/
Abstract

Investigators in neuroscience have turned to Big Data to address replication and reliability issues by increasing sample size. These efforts unveil new questions about how to integrate data across distinct sources and instruments. The goal of this study was to link scores across common auditory verbal learning tasks (AVLTs). This international secondary analysis aggregated multisite raw data for AVLTs across 53 studies totaling 10,505 individuals. Using the ComBat-GAM algorithm, we isolated and removed the component of memory scores associated with site effects while preserving instrumental effects. After adjustment, a continuous item response theory model used multiple memory items of varying difficulty to estimate each individual's latent verbal learning ability on a single scale. Equivalent raw scores across AVLTs were then found by linking individuals through the ability scale. Harmonization reduced total cross-site score variance by 37% while preserving meaningful memory effects. Age had the largest impact on scores overall (- 11.4%), while race/ethnicity variable was not significant (p > 0.05). The resulting tools were validated on dually administered tests. The conversion tool is available online so researchers and clinicians can convert memory scores across instruments. This work demonstrates that global harmonization initiatives can address reproducibility challenges across the behavioral sciences.

摘要

神经科学研究人员通过增加样本量来解决复制和可靠性问题,他们转而采用大数据方法。这些努力揭示了有关如何整合来自不同来源和仪器的数据的新问题。本研究的目的是链接常见听觉言语学习任务(AVLT)的分数。这项国际二次分析汇总了 53 项研究中共有 10505 人的 AVLT 多地点原始数据。使用 ComBat-GAM 算法,我们分离并去除了与站点效应相关的记忆分数成分,同时保留了仪器效应。调整后,使用具有不同难度的多个记忆项目的连续项目反应理论模型,在单个量表上估计每个个体的潜在言语学习能力。然后通过能力量表将个体联系起来,找到 AVLT 之间的等效原始分数。协调化将总跨站点得分方差降低了 37%,同时保留了有意义的记忆效果。年龄对总体分数的影响最大(-11.4%),而种族/民族变量则不显著(p>0.05)。对双重管理测试进行了验证。转换工具可在线获取,因此研究人员和临床医生可以在不同仪器之间转换记忆分数。这项工作表明,全球协调化举措可以解决行为科学中的可重复性挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/17f233e0da13/41598_2024_72968_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/5c361d9c071d/41598_2024_72968_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/c6bbfc853cd2/41598_2024_72968_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/1d6c71c9c6ac/41598_2024_72968_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/4beaf62cec2f/41598_2024_72968_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/17f233e0da13/41598_2024_72968_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/5c361d9c071d/41598_2024_72968_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/c6bbfc853cd2/41598_2024_72968_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/1d6c71c9c6ac/41598_2024_72968_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/4beaf62cec2f/41598_2024_72968_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e79/11484938/17f233e0da13/41598_2024_72968_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bridging big data in the ENIGMA consortium to combine non-equivalent cognitive measures.将 ENIGMA 联盟中的大数据进行桥接,以结合非等效的认知测量方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72968-x.
2
Bridging Big Data: Procedures for Combining Non-equivalent Cognitive Measures from the ENIGMA Consortium.连接大数据:整合来自ENIGMA联盟不等价认知测量的程序。
bioRxiv. 2023 Apr 7:2023.01.16.524331. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.16.524331.
3
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Role of learning potential in cognitive remediation: Construct and predictive validity.学习潜能在认知康复中的作用:结构效度与预测效度。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Mar;171(1-3):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.044. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Visual and verbal learning in a genetic metabolic disorder.一种遗传性代谢紊乱中的视觉和言语学习
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jul;47(8-9):1883-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.032. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
7
Refined Measurement of Verbal Learning and Memory: Application of Item Response Theory to California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) Learning Trials.言语学习和记忆的精细化测量:项目反应理论在加州言语学习测验-第二版(CVLT-II)学习测验中的应用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan 24;35(1):90-104. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy097.
8
Validation of the Affective Word List as a measure of verbal learning and memory.验证情感词表作为言语学习和记忆测量工具的有效性。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(3):316-24. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1012486. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
9
Examining the factor structure of the Rey auditory verbal learning test in individuals across the life span.考察瑞文听觉言语学习测验在整个生命周期个体中的因素结构。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 May;42(4):406-414. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1741517. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
10
Standardization and validation of a parallel form of the verbal and non-verbal recognition memory test in an Italian population sample.意大利人群样本中言语和非言语识别记忆测验平行形式的标准化和验证。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Aug;39(8):1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3433-z. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychosis MRI Shared Data Resource (Psy-ShareD).精神病磁共振成像共享数据资源(Psy-ShareD)。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 15;46(3):e70165. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70165.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions?在创伤性脑损伤文献中确立基本事实:如果重复研究是答案,那么问题是什么?
Brain Commun. 2022 Dec 8;5(1):fcac322. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac322. eCollection 2023.
2
How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis.大量科学研究中未能证伪导致了复制危机。
Elife. 2022 Aug 8;11:e78830. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78830.
3
Harmonizing PTSD severity scales across instruments and sites.跨仪器和地点协调 PTSD 严重程度量表。
Neuropsychology. 2023 May;37(4):398-408. doi: 10.1037/neu0000823. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Traumatic Brain Injury and Early Onset Dementia in Post 9-11 Veterans.创伤性脑损伤与“9·11”后退伍军人的早发性痴呆。
Brain Inj. 2022 Apr 16;36(5):620-627. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2033846. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
The Natural History of Sport-Related Concussion in Collegiate Athletes: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.大学生运动员与运动相关脑震荡的自然史:美国大学体育协会-美国国防部CARE联盟的研究结果
Sports Med. 2022 Feb;52(2):403-415. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01541-7. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
6
Phenotyping the Spectrum of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review and Pathway to Standardization.创伤性脑损伤谱的表型:综述与标准化途径。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3222-3234. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0059. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
The ENIGMA Brain Injury working group: approach, challenges, and potential benefits.ENIGMA 脑损伤工作组:方法、挑战和潜在益处。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Apr;15(2):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s11682-021-00450-7. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science.提高数据访问的民主化程度和多样性可以促进科学的发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23490-23498. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001682117. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.利用 ENIGMA 中的 ComBat 批量调整方法协调结构 MRI 站点差异来提高效能。
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116956. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116956. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries.ENIGMA 与全球神经科学:十年来,该计划在 40 多个国家开展了针对大脑在健康和疾病中的大规模研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;10(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0705-1.