Pizzolato Claudio, Shim Vickie B, Lloyd David G, Devaprakash Daniel, Obst Steven J, Newsham-West Richard, Graham David F, Besier Thor F, Zheng Ming Hao, Barrett Rod S
School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Aug 12;8:878. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00878. eCollection 2020.
Musculoskeletal tissues, including tendons, are sensitive to their mechanical environment, with both excessive and insufficient loading resulting in reduced tissue strength. Tendons appear to be particularly sensitive to mechanical strain magnitude, and there appears to be an optimal range of tendon strain that results in the greatest positive tendon adaptation. At present, there are no tools that allow localized tendon strain to be measured or estimated in training or a clinical environment. In this paper, we first review the current literature regarding Achilles tendon adaptation, providing an overview of the individual technologies that so far have been used in isolation to understand Achilles tendon mechanics, including 3D tendon imaging, motion capture, personalized neuromusculoskeletal rigid body models, and finite element models. We then describe how these technologies can be integrated in a novel framework to provide real-time feedback of localized Achilles tendon strain during dynamic motor tasks. In a proof of concept application, Achilles tendon localized strains were calculated in real-time for a single subject during walking, single leg hopping, and eccentric heel drop. Data was processed at 250 Hz and streamed on a smartphone for visualization. Achilles tendon peak localized strains ranged from ∼3 to ∼11% for walking, ∼5 to ∼15% during single leg hop, and ∼2 to ∼9% during single eccentric leg heel drop, overall showing large strain variation within the tendon. Our integrated framework connects, across size scales, knowledge from isolated tendons and whole-body biomechanics, and offers a new approach to Achilles tendon rehabilitation and training. A key feature is personalization of model components, such as tendon geometry, material properties, muscle geometry, muscle-tendon paths, moment arms, muscle activation, and movement patterns, all of which have the potential to affect tendon strain estimates. Model personalization is important because tendon strain can differ substantially between individuals performing the same exercise due to inter-individual differences in these model components.
包括肌腱在内的肌肉骨骼组织对其力学环境敏感,负荷过大或过小都会导致组织强度降低。肌腱似乎对机械应变幅度特别敏感,并且似乎存在一个能使肌腱产生最大正向适应性的最佳应变范围。目前,在训练或临床环境中,尚无工具可用于测量或估计局部肌腱应变。在本文中,我们首先回顾了当前关于跟腱适应性的文献,概述了迄今为止单独用于理解跟腱力学的各项技术,包括3D肌腱成像、运动捕捉、个性化神经肌肉骨骼刚体模型和有限元模型。然后,我们描述了如何将这些技术集成到一个新颖的框架中,以在动态运动任务期间提供局部跟腱应变的实时反馈。在一个概念验证应用中,在一名受试者行走、单腿跳跃和离心足跟下降过程中实时计算跟腱局部应变。数据以250Hz的频率进行处理,并在智能手机上进行流式传输以进行可视化。行走时跟腱局部峰值应变范围约为3%至11%,单腿跳跃时约为5%至15%,离心单腿足跟下降时约为2%至9%,总体显示出肌腱内应变变化较大。我们的集成框架跨越尺寸尺度,将孤立肌腱和全身生物力学的知识联系起来,并为跟腱康复和训练提供了一种新方法。一个关键特征是模型组件的个性化,例如肌腱几何形状、材料特性、肌肉几何形状、肌肉-肌腱路径、力臂、肌肉激活和运动模式,所有这些都有可能影响肌腱应变估计。模型个性化很重要,因为由于这些模型组件的个体差异,在进行相同运动的个体之间,肌腱应变可能会有很大差异。