• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论海洋保护区对可持续捕捞产量的溢出效应及最优规模

On the spillover effect and optimal size of marine reserves for sustainable fishing yields.

作者信息

Takashina Nao

机构信息

Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 Aug 25;8:e9798. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9798. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.9798
PMID:32904263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7453923/
Abstract

Marine reserves are an essential component of modern fishery management. Marine reserves, which represent a management tradeoff between harvesting and conservation, are fundamental to maintenance of fisheries. Finding optimal reserve sizes that improve fishing yields is not only of theoretical interest, but also of practical importance to facilitate decision making. Also, since the migratory behavior of some species influences the spillover effect of a marine reserve, this is a key consideration when assessing performance of marine reserves. The relationship between optimal reserve size and migration rate/mode has not been well studied, but it is fundamental to management success. Here, I investigate optimal reserve size and its management outcome with different levels of spillover via a simple two-patch mathematical model. In this model, one patch is open to fishing, and the other is closed. The two-patch model is aggregated by single-population dynamics when the migration rate is sufficiently larger than the growth rate of a target species. At this limit, I show that an optimal reserve size exists when pre-reserve fishing occurs at fishing mortality larger than , the fishing mortality at the maximum sustainable yield (MSY). Also, the fishing yield at an optimal reserve size becomes as large as MSY at the limit. Numerical simulations at various migration rates between the two patches suggest that the maximum harvest under management with a marine reserve is achieved at this limit. This contrasts with the conservation benefit which is maximized at an intermediate migration rate. Numerical simulations show that the above-mentioned condition for an optimal reserve size to exist derived from the aggregated model is necessary when the migration rate is not sufficiently large, and that a moderate migration rate is further necessary for an optimal reserve size to exist. However, high fishing mortality reduces this requirement.

摘要

海洋保护区是现代渔业管理的重要组成部分。海洋保护区体现了捕捞与保护之间的管理权衡,对渔业的维持至关重要。找到能提高捕鱼产量的最佳保护区规模不仅具有理论意义,对促进决策制定也具有实际重要性。此外,由于某些物种的洄游行为会影响海洋保护区的溢出效应,这是评估海洋保护区绩效时的关键考虑因素。最佳保护区规模与洄游率/洄游模式之间的关系尚未得到充分研究,但这对管理成功至关重要。在此,我通过一个简单的双斑块数学模型研究了不同溢出水平下的最佳保护区规模及其管理结果。在这个模型中,一个斑块开放用于捕鱼,另一个则关闭。当洄游率远大于目标物种的生长率时,双斑块模型由单种群动态聚合而成。在此极限情况下,我表明当保护区建立前的捕捞死亡率大于最大可持续产量(MSY)时的捕捞死亡率时,存在一个最佳保护区规模。而且,在该极限情况下,最佳保护区规模下的捕鱼产量会达到与MSY一样高。两个斑块之间不同洄游率的数值模拟表明,在这个极限情况下,通过海洋保护区管理可实现最大捕捞量。这与在中等洄游率下保护效益最大化形成对比。数值模拟表明,当洄游率不够大时,从聚合模型得出的上述最佳保护区规模存在的条件是必要的,并且最佳保护区规模的存在还需要适度的洄游率。然而,高捕捞死亡率会降低这一要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/ae8a5d627222/peerj-08-9798-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/d9f51b2c0b80/peerj-08-9798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/cef3e007cfd0/peerj-08-9798-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/045baf287b5f/peerj-08-9798-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/aeafc7d60625/peerj-08-9798-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/c954e2cb186f/peerj-08-9798-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/ae8a5d627222/peerj-08-9798-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/d9f51b2c0b80/peerj-08-9798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/cef3e007cfd0/peerj-08-9798-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/045baf287b5f/peerj-08-9798-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/aeafc7d60625/peerj-08-9798-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/c954e2cb186f/peerj-08-9798-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680c/7453923/ae8a5d627222/peerj-08-9798-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
On the spillover effect and optimal size of marine reserves for sustainable fishing yields.论海洋保护区对可持续捕捞产量的溢出效应及最优规模
PeerJ. 2020 Aug 25;8:e9798. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9798. eCollection 2020.
2
Collaborative assessment of California spiny lobster population and fishery responses to a marine reserve network.加利福尼亚刺龙虾种群与渔业对海洋保护区网络响应的协同评估。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jan;22(1):322-35. doi: 10.1890/11-0155.1.
3
Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries.在单物种和多物种渔业中,在海洋保护区附近钓鱼。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Jun;17(4):1039-54. doi: 10.1890/05-1845.
4
When is spillover from marine reserves likely to benefit fisheries?海洋保护区的生物溢出效应何时可能使渔业受益?
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e107032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107032. eCollection 2014.
5
Marine reserves can buffer against environmental fluctuations for overexploited but not sustainably harvested fisheries.海洋保护区可以为过度开发但未可持续捕捞的渔业缓冲环境波动。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Dec;34(8):e3043. doi: 10.1002/eap.3043. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Regional differences in fishing behavior determine whether a marine reserve network enhances fishery yield.捕捞行为的区域性差异决定了海洋保护区网络是否能提高渔业产量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51525-6.
7
On the optimal size of marine reserves.论海洋保护区的最佳规模。
Acta Biotheor. 2013 Mar;61(1):109-18. doi: 10.1007/s10441-013-9173-9. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
Marine reserve effects on fishery profit.海洋保护区对渔业利润的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2008 Apr;11(4):370-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01151.x. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
9
Effects of sex change on the implications of marine reserves for fisheries.性别的改变对海洋保护区对渔业影响的启示。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Apr;22(3):778-91. doi: 10.1890/11-0036.1.
10
Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty.存在生态不确定性的海洋保护区。
Bull Math Biol. 2005 Sep;67(5):957-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bulm.2004.11.006.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Distance Benefits of Marine Reserves: Myth or Reality?海洋保护区的长途效益:是神话还是现实?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;34(4):342-354. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Marine reserves solve an important bycatch problem in fisheries.海洋保护区解决了渔业中一个重要的兼捕问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):8927-8934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705169114. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change.海洋保护区可以缓解和促进对气候变化的适应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):6167-6175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701262114. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally.能力短缺阻碍了全球海洋保护区的运行。
Nature. 2017 Mar 30;543(7647):665-669. doi: 10.1038/nature21708. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
Biological conservation through marine protected areas in the presence of alternative stable states.在存在替代稳定状态的情况下,通过海洋保护区实现生物保护。
Math Biosci. 2017 Apr;286:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Tradeoffs between fisheries harvest and the resilience of coral reefs.渔业捕捞与珊瑚礁恢复力之间的权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4536-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601529113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
7
Simple rules for establishment of effective marine protected areas in an age-structured metapopulation.在具有年龄结构的集合种群中建立有效海洋保护区的简单规则。
J Theor Biol. 2016 Feb 21;391:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Exploring the effect of the spatial scale of fishery management.探索渔业管理空间尺度的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2016 Feb 7;390:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
9
Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles.海洋保护区建模:见解与障碍
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0278.
10
The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.海洋保护区对渔业产量的利弊
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0276.