Suppr超能文献

不同抛光技术对三种玻璃离子基修复材料表面粗糙度和细菌黏附的影响:研究

Effect of different polishing techniques on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of three glass ionomer-based restorative materials: study.

作者信息

Ismail Hoda S, Ali Ashraf I, Abo El-Ella Mohammed A, Mahmoud Salah H

机构信息

Assistant Lecturer, Operative Dentistry Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Associate Professor, Operative Dentistry Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jul 1;12(7):e620-e625. doi: 10.4317/jced.56616. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although many reports concluded that polishing of glass ionomers is crucial for smoother surface and limiting the adhesion of cariogenic bacteria, there is no specific surface treatment protocol recommended. A novel material in the same category was released recently claimed to have surface smoothness comparable to resin composite and bacterial adhesion less than other types of glass ionomers. In this study, different polishing systems were tested with three glass ionomers one of them is the novel material to find the most appropriate polishing protocol. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to resin modified glass ionomer, bioactive ionic resin and conventional glass ionomer restorative materials after different polishing protocols in vitro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The materials tested includes resin modified glass ionomer, bioactive ionic resin, and conventional glass ionomer. The polishing protocols were divided into four groups: group 1 = (Mylar matrix strips, Control), group 2 = (one-step, PoGo), group 3 = (two-step, Prisma Gloss) and group 4 = (three-step, Sof-Lex). From each material, eleven cylindrical specimens were prepared for each group according to the manufacturers' instructions. The surface roughness for all specimens was measured using atomic force microscope in tapping mode. the same specimens were subjected to bacterial adhesion testing after being coated with artificial saliva. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance followed by Post hoc multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The highest Ra and adhesion values were recorded for all materials in two-step group. The lowest Ra and adhesion values were seen in one-step and three step groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One-step polishing system was more effective and may be preferable for polishing of the three studied glass ionomer-based materials compared to two-step and three-step systems. Activa bioactive restorative, glass ionomer, surface roughness, bacterial adhesion, surface treatment.

摘要

背景

尽管许多报告得出结论,玻璃离子水门汀的抛光对于获得更光滑的表面以及限制致龋菌的黏附至关重要,但目前尚无推荐的特定表面处理方案。最近有一种同类新型材料问世,据称其表面光滑度与树脂复合材料相当,且细菌黏附性低于其他类型的玻璃离子水门汀。在本研究中,对三种玻璃离子水门汀(其中一种是新型材料)测试了不同的抛光系统,以找出最合适的抛光方案。目的:在体外评估和比较不同抛光方案后,树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、生物活性离子树脂和传统玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的表面粗糙度和细菌黏附情况。

材料与方法

测试材料包括树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、生物活性离子树脂和传统玻璃离子水门汀。抛光方案分为四组:第1组 =(聚酯薄膜基质条,对照组),第2组 =(一步法,PoGo),第3组 =(两步法,Prisma Gloss),第4组 =(三步法,Sof-Lex)。根据制造商的说明,为每组每种材料制备11个圆柱形试件。使用原子力显微镜在轻敲模式下测量所有试件的表面粗糙度。相同的试件在涂覆人工唾液后进行细菌黏附测试。数据采用双向方差分析,随后进行事后多重比较。

结果

两步法组中所有材料的表面粗糙度(Ra)和黏附值最高。一步法和三步法组的Ra和黏附值最低。

结论

与两步法和三步法系统相比,一步法抛光系统对三种研究的玻璃离子基材料进行抛光更有效,可能更可取。活性生物活性修复材料、玻璃离子水门汀、表面粗糙度、细菌黏附、表面处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70ad/7462382/ba894d61abe6/jced-12-e620-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验