Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):427-436. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa131.
Limited access aortic valve replacement is an alternative approach for the treatment of calcified aortic valve disease. To facilitate limited access aortic valve replacement, rapid deployment valve prostheses have been developed aiming to reduce surgical impact. This systematic review gives an overview of current literature regarding the INTUITY or INTUITY Elite rapid deployment biological valve prosthesis.
Cochrane, Embase and MEDLINE were searched to identify relevant studies. All studies reporting on patients who underwent isolated or combined surgical aortic valve replacement with the INTUITY or INTUITY Elite valve prosthesis were considered eligible. Primary end points were technical success rate, 30-day mortality, cerebrovascular accident, paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker implantation. Secondary end points included procedural data such as aortic cross-clamping time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and procedural approach.
A total of 16 articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and comprised 4.184 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 2.7% (1.9-3.7%), cerebrovascular accident 2.6% (1.4-4.7%), permanent pacemaker implantation 7.9% (6.6-9.5%) and severe postoperative paravalvular leak requiring a reintervention 3.3% (1.7-6.1%). Technical success rate varied between 93.9% and 100%. Conventional median sternotomy was most commonly performed, ranging from 21.7% to 89.6%. Upper hemi-sternotomy was performed more often than anterior right thoracotomy, ranging from 10.4% to 63.3% and 2.2% to 26.1%. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient ranged between 9.0 and 10.3 mmHg at 1 year postoperatively.
This review demonstrates that the technical success rate of the INTUITY or INTUITY Elite rapid deployment valve system is high, also in limited access aortic valve replacement. Mortality and cerebrovascular accident rates are low, but the need for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation and reintervention rate for paravalvular leakage is increased.
有限入路主动脉瓣置换术是治疗钙化性主动脉瓣疾病的一种替代方法。为了促进有限入路主动脉瓣置换术的发展,已经开发了快速部署瓣膜假体,旨在减少手术影响。本系统评价概述了有关 INTUITY 或 INTUITY Elite 快速部署生物瓣假体的当前文献。
检索 Cochrane、Embase 和 MEDLINE 以确定相关研究。所有报告接受 INTUITY 或 INTUITY Elite 瓣膜假体单独或联合外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者的研究均符合纳入标准。主要终点为技术成功率、30 天死亡率、脑血管意外、瓣周漏和永久性起搏器植入。次要终点包括手术数据,如主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间和手术途径。
共有 16 篇文章符合纳入和排除标准,包括 4184 例患者。30 天死亡率为 2.7%(1.9-3.7%),脑血管意外为 2.6%(1.4-4.7%),永久性起搏器植入率为 7.9%(6.6-9.5%),严重术后瓣周漏需要再次介入治疗的比例为 3.3%(1.7-6.1%)。技术成功率在 93.9%至 100%之间变化。最常进行的是传统的正中胸骨切开术,范围为 21.7%至 89.6%。上半胸骨切开术比前右开胸术更常见,范围为 10.4%至 63.3%和 2.2%至 26.1%。术后 1 年跨瓣压差平均为 9.0 至 10.3mmHg。
本综述表明,INTUITY 或 INTUITY Elite 快速部署瓣膜系统的技术成功率较高,在有限入路主动脉瓣置换术中也是如此。死亡率和脑血管意外发生率较低,但需要术后永久性起搏器植入和瓣周漏再介入治疗的比率增加。