• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进和支持大学校园可持续食物系统政策的范围综述。

A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting.

机构信息

School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Nutr J. 2020 Sep 10;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w
PMID:32912299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7488481/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transitioning towards sustainable food systems for the health of the population and planet will require governments and institutions to develop effective governance to support the adoption of sustainable food practices. The aim of the paper is to describe current governance within Australian and New Zealand universities designed to support sustainable food systems.

METHODS

A systematic search of governance documents to support sustainable food systems within Australian and New Zealand universities was conducted. Data were obtained from 1) targeted websites 2) internet search engines and 3) expert consultations. Inclusion criteria consisted of university governance documents including by-laws, policies, guidelines, frameworks, and procedures that support sustainable food systems.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine governance documents across nineteen Australian and New Zealand universities were included for synthesis, including waste management policies (n = 3), fair-trade/procurement policies (n = 6), catering and or event guidelines (n = 7) and catering policies (n = 2), and environmental management plans (n = 11). The main strategies adopted by universities were sustainable waste management and prevention (e.g. reducing landfill, reducing wasted food, (27%)), ethical procurement practices (i.e. fair-trade (27%)) and environmentally sustainable food consumption (e.g. local, seasonal, organic, vegetarian food supply (14.5%)). Only 12.5% of universities addressed all three of the main strategies identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that while sustainable food systems are considered in some university governance documents, efforts are predominantly focused on aspects such as waste management or procurement of fair-trade items which as stand-alone practices are likely to have minimal impact. This review highlights the scope of universities to provide strong leadership in promoting and supporting sustainable food systems through holistic institutional policies and governance mechanisms.

摘要

背景

为了促进人口和地球健康,向可持续的食物系统过渡需要政府和机构制定有效的治理措施,以支持可持续食物实践的采用。本文旨在描述澳大利亚和新西兰大学中支持可持续食物系统的现有治理措施。

方法

对澳大利亚和新西兰大学中支持可持续食物系统的治理文件进行了系统搜索。从以下三个来源获取数据:1)目标网站;2)互联网搜索引擎;3)专家咨询。纳入标准包括支持可持续食物系统的大学治理文件,如章程、政策、准则、框架和程序。

结果

共纳入了 19 所澳大利亚和新西兰大学的 29 份治理文件进行综合分析,其中包括废物管理政策(n=3)、公平贸易/采购政策(n=6)、餐饮和/或活动准则(n=7)和餐饮政策(n=2),以及环境管理计划(n=11)。大学采用的主要策略包括可持续的废物管理和预防措施(例如减少垃圾填埋场、减少食物浪费,占 27%)、道德采购实践(即公平贸易,占 27%)和环境可持续的食物消费(例如,当地、季节性、有机、素食食品供应,占 14.5%)。只有 12.5%的大学采取了所有三个主要策略。

结论

本研究表明,尽管可持续食物系统在一些大学治理文件中得到了考虑,但努力主要集中在废物管理或公平贸易物品采购等方面,这些孤立的措施可能只会产生最小的影响。本综述突出了大学通过全面的机构政策和治理机制,在促进和支持可持续食物系统方面提供强有力领导的范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a015/7488481/f8be51456628/12937_2020_617_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a015/7488481/f8be51456628/12937_2020_617_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a015/7488481/f8be51456628/12937_2020_617_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting.促进和支持大学校园可持续食物系统政策的范围综述。
Nutr J. 2020 Sep 10;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Benchmarking the healthiness, equity and environmental sustainability of university food environments in Australia, 2021/22.2021/22年澳大利亚大学食品环境的健康、公平性与环境可持续性基准评估
BMC Nutr. 2025 Feb 11;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01029-x.
4
Development of the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool and assessment process to benchmark the implementation of local government policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.地方食品系统政策指数(Local Food-EPI+)工具及评估流程的开发,用于衡量地方政府创建健康、公平且环境可持续食品系统政策的实施情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 2;27(1):e191. doi: 10.1017/S136898002400140X.
5
Local urban government policies to facilitate healthy and environmentally sustainable diet-related practices: a scoping review.地方城市政府政策促进健康和环境可持续的与饮食相关的实践:范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):471-487. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004432. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
6
Comparative analysis of school food policies in Australian jurisdictions: Insights for more effective policy action.澳大利亚各司法管辖区学校食品政策的比较分析:对更有效政策行动的见解
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jan;36(1):e916. doi: 10.1002/hpja.916. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
7
Which government policies to create sustainable food systems have the potential to simultaneously address undernutrition, obesity and environmental sustainability?哪些政府政策有可能同时解决营养不良、肥胖和环境可持续性问题,以建立可持续的粮食系统?
Global Health. 2024 Jul 27;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01060-w.
8
Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.大学食品环境评估(Uni-Food)工具及流程的开发,用于衡量大学食品环境的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.
9
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
10
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Experiential Learning Using an Indoor Aquaponic System on Nutrition Students' Sustainable Food Knowledge and Behaviour.使用室内鱼菜共生系统的体验式学习对营养专业学生可持续食品知识和行为的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70103. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70103.
2
Adherence to the Planetary Health Diet and Its Association with Diet Quality and Environmental Outcomes in Croatian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.克罗地亚大学生对行星健康饮食的依从性及其与饮食质量和环境结果的关联:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2025 May 29;17(11):1850. doi: 10.3390/nu17111850.
3
Food Insecurity Among Australian University Students Is Higher and More Severe Across an Extended Period of High Inflation: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 2022-2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable, resilient food systems for healthy diets: the transformation agenda.促进健康饮食的可持续、有韧性的粮食系统:转型议程。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):2916-2920. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003112. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
2
A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey.健康、可持续和安全的食物系统:使用德尔菲调查研究澳大利亚政策参与者的认知和作用。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):2921-2930. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900185X. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.
澳大利亚大学生的粮食不安全状况在长期高通胀期间更高且更严重:一项2022 - 2024年的重复横断面研究
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e70037. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70037.
4
Do US-based university pouring rights contracts with beverage companies include provisions that promote environmental sustainability?美国大学与饮料公司签订的售酒权合同是否包含促进环境可持续性的条款?
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Feb 13;51:103001. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103001. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Analysis of hotspots and emerging trends in school foodservice research using CiteSpace.使用CiteSpace对学校食品服务研究中的热点和新趋势进行分析。
Nutr Res Pract. 2024 Dec;18(6):910-923. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2024.18.6.910. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Benchmarking the university campus food environment and exploring student perspectives about food insecurity and healthy eating: a case study from Australia.对标大学校园食物环境,探索学生对食物不安全和健康饮食的看法:来自澳大利亚的一项案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 6;24(1):1245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18664-x.
7
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Food Environment at an Australian University Campus.澳大利亚大学校园食物环境的横断面评估。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 27;15(7):1623. doi: 10.3390/nu15071623.
8
Severity of Food Insecurity among Australian University Students, Professional and Academic Staff.澳大利亚大学生、专业人士和学术人员的粮食不安全严重程度。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 23;14(19):3956. doi: 10.3390/nu14193956.
9
Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.大学食品环境评估(Uni-Food)工具及流程的开发,用于衡量大学食品环境的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.
10
Toward a Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Campus Food Environment: A Scoping Review of Postsecondary Food Interventions.迈向健康和环境可持续的校园食物环境:高等教育食物干预措施的范围综述。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;12(5):1996-2022. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab026.
人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis.针对人类行为有意识决定因素的干预措施以减少对肉类的需求:系统评价与定性比较分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 19;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Socio-Demographic Determinants of Diet Quality in Australian Adults Using the Validated Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults (HEIFA-2013).使用澳大利亚成年人验证版健康饮食指数(HEIFA - 2013)对澳大利亚成年人饮食质量的社会人口学决定因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Feb 4;5(1):7. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5010007.
7
Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: critical reflections on three case studies.公共卫生领域中“灰色文献”与“灰色信息”的检索与综合:对三个案例研究的批判性思考
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;5(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y.
8
Healthy universities: an example of a whole-system health-promoting setting.健康大学:一个全系统促进健康环境的范例。
Glob Health Promot. 2016 Mar;23(1 Suppl):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1757975915601037.
9
Prevalence and period trends of overweight and obesity in Australian young adults.澳大利亚年轻成年人超重和肥胖的患病率及时间趋势。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep;70(9):1083-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.41. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Research Priorities for NCD Prevention and Climate Change: An International Delphi Survey.非传染性疾病预防与气候变化的研究重点:一项国际德尔菲调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 16;12(10):12941-57. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012941.