• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地方食品系统政策指数(Local Food-EPI+)工具及评估流程的开发,用于衡量地方政府创建健康、公平且环境可持续食品系统政策的实施情况。

Development of the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool and assessment process to benchmark the implementation of local government policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.

作者信息

Ruffini Oriana, Relf Chanel, Mann Davina, Blake Miranda R, Carrad Amy, Reeve Belinda, Barbour Liza, Vanderlee Lana, Vandevijvere Stefanie, Sacks Gary

机构信息

Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

City of Greater Bendigo, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 2;27(1):e191. doi: 10.1017/S136898002400140X.

DOI:10.1017/S136898002400140X
PMID:39354657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11504496/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Local governments have an important role to play in creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems. This study aimed to develop and pilot a tool and process for local governments in Australia to benchmark their policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.

DESIGN

The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), developed in 2013 for national governments, was tailored to develop the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool for local governments. To incorporate environmental sustainability and the local government context, this process involved a literature review and collaboration with an international and domestic expert advisory committee ( 35) and local government officials.

SETTING

Local governments.

RESULTS

The tool consists of sixty-one indicators across ten food policy domains (weighted based on relative importance): leadership; governance; funding and resources; monitoring and intelligence; food production and supply chain; food promotion; food provision and retail in public facilities and spaces; supermarkets and food sources in the community; food waste reuse, redistribution and reduction; and support for communities. Pilot implementation of the tool in one local government demonstrated that the assessment process was feasible and likely to be helpful in guiding policy implementation.

CONCLUSION

The Local Food-EPI+ tool and assessment process offer a comprehensive mechanism to assist local governments in benchmarking their actions to improve the healthiness, equity and environmental sustainability of food systems and prioritise action areas. Broad use of this tool will identify and promote leading practices, increase accountability for action and build capacity and collaborations.

摘要

目的

地方政府在创建健康、公平且环境可持续的食品系统方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在开发并试点一种工具及流程,供澳大利亚地方政府用以衡量其创建健康、公平且环境可持续的食品系统的政策。

设计

2013年为各国政府开发的健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)经调整后,为地方政府开发了地方食品系统政策指数(Local Food-EPI+)工具。为纳入环境可持续性及地方政府的实际情况,这一过程包括文献综述以及与一个国际和国内专家咨询委员会(35人)及地方政府官员的合作。

背景

地方政府。

结果

该工具由十个食品政策领域的61项指标组成(根据相对重要性加权):领导力;治理;资金与资源;监测与情报;食品生产与供应链;食品推广;公共设施和场所的食品供应与零售;社区内的超市与食品来源;食品废物的再利用、再分配与减少;以及对社区的支持。在一个地方政府对该工具进行的试点实施表明,评估过程是可行的,并且可能有助于指导政策实施。

结论

Local Food-EPI+工具及评估流程提供了一种全面机制,可协助地方政府衡量其行动,以改善食品系统的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性,并确定行动领域的优先次序。广泛使用该工具将识别并推广领先做法,增强行动的问责制,并建设能力及促进合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e50/11504496/409f6c728fb7/S136898002400140X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e50/11504496/c8a331a2468e/S136898002400140X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e50/11504496/409f6c728fb7/S136898002400140X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e50/11504496/c8a331a2468e/S136898002400140X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e50/11504496/409f6c728fb7/S136898002400140X_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool and assessment process to benchmark the implementation of local government policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.地方食品系统政策指数(Local Food-EPI+)工具及评估流程的开发,用于衡量地方政府创建健康、公平且环境可持续食品系统政策的实施情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 2;27(1):e191. doi: 10.1017/S136898002400140X.
2
Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.大学食品环境评估(Uni-Food)工具及流程的开发,用于衡量大学食品环境的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.
3
Benchmarking for accountability on obesity prevention: evaluation of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) in Australia (2016-2020).肥胖预防问责制的基准测试:澳大利亚健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的评估(2016-2020 年)。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):488-497. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100447X. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Pilot test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to increase government actions for creating healthy food environments.健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的初步测试,以增加政府为营造健康食品环境而采取的行动。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 9;5(1):e006194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194.
5
An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018.11 个国家使用健康食品环境政策指数对各国政府实施推荐营养政策的情况进行基准测试,2015-2018 年。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:57-66. doi: 10.1111/obr.12819. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel's assessment and priority recommendations.肯尼亚预防与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的食品环境政策基准测试:国家专家小组的评估和重点建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
7
Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy Food Environment Policy Index.监测和基准化政府政策和行动,以改善食品环境的健康程度:拟议的政府健康食品环境政策指数。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:24-37. doi: 10.1111/obr.12073.
8
Local urban government policies to facilitate healthy and environmentally sustainable diet-related practices: a scoping review.地方城市政府政策促进健康和环境可持续的与饮食相关的实践:范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):471-487. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004432. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
Food Environment in Burkina Faso: Review of Public Policies and Government Actions Using the Food-EPI Tool.布基纳法索的食物环境:利用食物-EPI 工具审查公共政策和政府行动。
Food Nutr Bull. 2024 Jun;45(2-3):74-90. doi: 10.1177/03795721241248214. Epub 2024 May 8.
10
Local government policy to facilitate healthy and sustainable diets and the broader policy hierarchy: insights from Milan Urban Food Policy Pact cities.地方政府促进健康和可持续饮食的政策与更广泛的政策层次:来自米兰城市粮食政策契约城市的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 24;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00988-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of physical activity policies in the Netherlands: a study applying the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI).荷兰体育活动政策的实施:一项应用体育活动环境政策指数(PA-EPI)的研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 19;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01340-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Policy implementation and priorities to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): A pooled level analysis across eleven European countries.使用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)创建健康食品环境的政策实施与优先事项:对11个欧洲国家的汇总水平分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Nov 16;23:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Food system policy making and innovation at the local level: Exploring the response of Australian local governments to critical food systems issues.地方层面的食品系统政策制定与创新:探究澳大利亚地方政府对关键食品系统问题的应对措施。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Apr;34(2):488-499. doi: 10.1002/hpja.626. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
3
Australian local government policies on creating a healthy, sustainable, and equitable food system: analysis in New South Wales and Victoria.
澳大利亚地方政府创建健康、可持续和公平食品系统的政策:新南威尔士州和维多利亚州的分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Jun;46(3):332-339. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13239. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
The potential of food environment policies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diets and to improve healthy diets among lower socioeconomic groups: an umbrella review.食物环境政策在减少饮食方面的社会经济不平等和改善较低社会经济群体健康饮食方面的潜力:伞式审查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12827-4.
5
Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.大学食品环境评估(Uni-Food)工具及流程的开发,用于衡量大学食品环境的健康性、公平性和环境可持续性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.
6
Benchmarking for accountability on obesity prevention: evaluation of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) in Australia (2016-2020).肥胖预防问责制的基准测试:澳大利亚健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的评估(2016-2020 年)。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):488-497. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100447X. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Local urban government policies to facilitate healthy and environmentally sustainable diet-related practices: a scoping review.地方城市政府政策促进健康和环境可持续的与饮食相关的实践:范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):471-487. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004432. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
A state-wide audit of unhealthy sponsorship within junior sporting clubs in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州对初级体育俱乐部中不健康赞助的全州审计。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3797-3804. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002159. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Benchmarking as a Public Health Strategy for Creating Healthy Food Environments: An Evaluation of the INFORMAS Initiative (2012-2020).作为创建健康食品环境的公共卫生策略的基准评估:对INFORMAS倡议(2012 - 2020年)的评价
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:345-362. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-100919-114442. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
Benchmarking the Nutrition-Related Policies and Commitments of Major Food Companies in Australia, 2018.2018 年澳大利亚主要食品公司的营养相关政策和承诺基准比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 22;17(17):6118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176118.