Department of Medicine, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, USA.
Department of Medicine, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, USA.
Thromb Res. 2020 Dec;196:227-230. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
There is no current standardized approach to anticoagulation in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) while potential bleeding risks remain. Our study characterizes the patterns of anticoagulation use in COVID-19 patients and the risk of related bleeding.
This is a single center retrospective analysis of 355 adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 1 to May 31, 2020. Chi-square was used to analyze the relationship between degree of anticoagulant dose and bleeding events by site. Multivariable logistic regression was used to look at factors associated with inpatient death.
61% of patients were being treated with prophylactic doses of anticoagulation, while 7% and 29% were being treated with sub-therapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation (TA) doses respectively. In 44% of patients, we found that the decision to escalate the dose of anticoagulation was based on laboratory values characterizing the severity of COVID-19 such as rising D-dimer levels. There were significantly higher rates of bleeding from non-CNS/non-GI sites (p = 0.039) and from any bleeding site overall (p = 0.019) with TA. TA was associated with significantly higher rates of inpatient death (41.6% vs 15.3% p < 0.0001) compared to those without. All patients who developed CNS hemorrhage died p = 0.011. After multivariable logistic regression, only age OR 1.04 95% CI (1.01 to 1.07) p = 0.008 and therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with inpatient mortality OR 6.16 95% CI (2.96 to 12.83) p ≤ 0.0001.
The use of TA was significantly associated with increased risk of bleeding. Bleeding in turn exhibited trends towards higher inpatient death among patients with COVID-19. These findings should be interpreted with caution and larger more controlled studies are needed to verify the net effects of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19.
在新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者中,尽管存在潜在的出血风险,但目前尚无标准化的抗凝治疗方法。我们的研究描述了 COVID-19 患者抗凝治疗的模式以及相关出血的风险。
这是一项对 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日期间确诊为 COVID-19 的 355 例成年患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。通过卡方检验分析抗凝药物剂量程度与出血部位之间的关系。采用多变量逻辑回归分析与住院期间死亡相关的因素。
61%的患者接受预防性抗凝治疗,7%和 29%的患者接受亚治疗和治疗性抗凝(TA)剂量治疗。在 44%的患者中,我们发现,决定增加抗凝药物剂量的依据是反映 COVID-19 严重程度的实验室值,如 D-二聚体水平升高。与非 CNS/非 GI 部位(p=0.039)和任何出血部位(p=0.019)相比,TA 出血的发生率显著更高。与未接受 TA 治疗的患者相比,接受 TA 治疗的患者住院期间死亡率显著更高(41.6% vs 15.3%,p<0.0001)。所有发生中枢神经系统出血的患者均死亡(p=0.011)。经多变量逻辑回归分析,仅年龄 OR 1.04 95%CI(1.01 至 1.07)p=0.008 和治疗性抗凝与住院死亡率相关 OR 6.16 95%CI(2.96 至 12.83)p≤0.0001。
TA 的使用与出血风险的增加显著相关。出血反过来也显示出 COVID-19 患者住院期间死亡风险升高的趋势。这些发现应谨慎解释,需要进行更大规模、更严格控制的研究来验证 COVID-19 患者抗凝治疗的净效应。