Wolfe Rory, Wetmore James B, Woods Robyn L, McNeil John J, Gallagher Hugh, Roderick Paul, Walker Rowan, Nelson Mark R, Reid Christopher M, Shah Raj C, Ernst Michael E, Lockery Jessica E, Tonkin Andrew M, Abhayaratna Walter P, Gibbs Peter, Wood Erica M, Mahady Suzanne E, Williamson Jeff D, Donnan Geoffrey A, Cloud Geoffrey C, Murray Anne M, Polkinghorne Kevan R
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kidney Int. 2021 Feb;99(2):466-474. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
The role of aspirin for primary prevention in older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. Therefore, post hoc analysis of the randomized controlled trial ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) was undertaken comparing 100 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily against matching placebo. Participants were community dwelling adults aged 70 years and older in Australia, 65 years and older in the United States, all free of a history of dementia or cardiovascular disease and of any disease expected to lead to death within five years. CKD was defined as present at baseline if either eGFR under 60mL/min/1.73m or urine albumin to creatinine ratio 3 mg/mmol or more. In 4758 participants with and 13004 without CKD, the rates of a composite endpoint (dementia, persistent physical disability or death), major adverse cardiovascular events and clinically significant bleeding in the CKD participants were almost double those without CKD. Aspirin's effects as estimated by hazard ratios were generally similar between CKD and non-CKD groups for dementia, persistent physical disability or death, major adverse cardiovascular events and clinically significant bleeding. Thus, in our analysis aspirin did not improve outcomes in older people while increasing the risk of bleeding, with mostly consistent effects in participants with and without CKD.
阿司匹林在老年慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者一级预防中的作用尚不清楚。因此,我们对“阿司匹林减少老年人事件(ASPREE)”随机对照试验进行了事后分析,比较每日服用100毫克肠溶阿司匹林与匹配的安慰剂的效果。参与者为澳大利亚70岁及以上、美国65岁及以上的社区居住成年人,均无痴呆或心血管疾病史,且无预计在五年内导致死亡的任何疾病。如果估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)低于60mL/(min·1.73m²)或尿白蛋白与肌酐比值为3mg/mmol或更高,则定义为基线时存在CKD。在4758名患有CKD和13004名未患CKD的参与者中,CKD参与者的复合终点(痴呆、持续性身体残疾或死亡)、主要不良心血管事件和具有临床意义的出血发生率几乎是非CKD参与者的两倍。对于痴呆、持续性身体残疾或死亡、主要不良心血管事件和具有临床意义的出血,CKD组和非CKD组通过风险比估算的阿司匹林效果总体相似。因此,在我们的分析中,阿司匹林并未改善老年人的预后,同时增加了出血风险,在患有和未患有CKD的参与者中效果大多一致。