Pharmacology Department, College of Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
Inflammopharmacology. 2020 Dec;28(6):1477-1480. doi: 10.1007/s10787-020-00755-x. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a correspondence, published at the Lancet Respiratory Medicine, that linked angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and ibuprofen to a higher risk of SARS CoV-2 infection and complications, has influenced, when adopted by official health authorities, the practical management of COVID-19 with regard to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that were avoided in all COVID-19 management protocols all over the world. This manuscript discusses, from a pharmacological point of view, the points of weakness in the mentioned correspondence and it also lists some important contradictory review articles as well as clinical results that refuted its claims. The author chose to argue against each claim represented in the mentioned correspondence to confirm that ACEIs, ARBs and NSAIDs including ibuprofen should not be considered hazardous to be administered for COVID-19 patients and to warn against any future adoption of such unproved claims.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,柳叶刀呼吸医学杂志发表的一封通信,将血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和布洛芬与 SARS-CoV-2 感染和并发症的风险增加联系起来,当被官方卫生当局采用时,影响了 COVID-19 的实际管理,避免了全世界所有 COVID-19 管理方案中使用的非甾体抗炎药。本文从药理学角度讨论了上述通信中的弱点,并列出了一些重要的反驳性综述文章以及临床结果,驳斥了其主张。作者选择反驳上述通信中提到的每一项主张,以确认 ACEIs、ARBs 和包括布洛芬在内的 NSAIDs 不应被视为对 COVID-19 患者有危险,并警告不要再次采用这种未经证实的主张。