• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑与地西泮作为上消化道内镜检查术前用药的比较:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。

Midazolam versus diazepam as premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

作者信息

Bianchi Porro G, Baroni S, Parente F, Lazzaroni M

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Unit, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 May-Jun;34(3):252-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71323-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71323-1
PMID:3292344
Abstract

The effectiveness of midazolam as premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was examined and compared with that of diazepam in a double-blind crossover study involving 23 patients. The degree of sedation and cooperation of patients during the procedure and the speed of recovery from sedation were comparable for the two drugs. The effects of both compounds on arterial blood pressure and heart rate were quite similar. However, midazolam induced significantly more amnesia than diazepam (91% vs. 39%). Also, patients' acceptability for the procedure was significantly higher in the midazolam than in the diazepam group (78% vs. 26%). Therefore, when amnesia is desirable, as in the case of repeated endoscopies, midazolam should be the drug of choice.

摘要

在一项涉及23名患者的双盲交叉研究中,对咪达唑仑作为上消化道内镜检查术前用药的有效性进行了检验,并与地西泮进行了比较。两种药物在操作过程中患者的镇静程度和配合度以及镇静恢复速度方面相当。两种化合物对动脉血压和心率的影响非常相似。然而,咪达唑仑诱导的遗忘作用明显强于地西泮(91%对39%)。此外,咪达唑仑组患者对该操作的接受度显著高于地西泮组(78%对26%)。因此,当需要遗忘作用时,如在重复内镜检查的情况下,咪达唑仑应作为首选药物。

相似文献

1
Midazolam versus diazepam as premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.咪达唑仑与地西泮作为上消化道内镜检查术前用药的比较:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 May-Jun;34(3):252-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71323-1.
2
Diazepam versus midazolam (versed) in outpatient colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized study.门诊结肠镜检查中地西泮与咪达唑仑(速眠安)的比较:一项双盲随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Jan-Feb;35(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72682-1.
3
Comparative study of midazolam and diazepam in premedication of bronchoscopy.咪达唑仑与地西泮用于支气管镜检查术前用药的对比研究
Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1991;131:233-41.
4
[Comparative study between midazolam and diazepam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy premedication].咪达唑仑与地西泮在上消化道内镜检查术前用药中的对比研究
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1996 Sep-Dec;16(3):222-7.
5
Randomized, double-blind trial of midazolam and diazepam for endoscopic sedation in children.
Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1990;14(3):141-7.
6
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam.上消化道内镜检查的镇静:咪达唑仑与地西泮的对比研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Mar-Apr;35(2):82-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72713-9.
7
Pre-endoscopic medication. A randomized double-blind trial of atropine and meperidine as a supplement to diazepam.内镜检查前用药。阿托品与哌替啶作为地西泮补充剂的随机双盲试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1979;14(6):747-51. doi: 10.3109/00365527909181948.
8
A comparison of diazepam and phenoperidine in premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized double blind controlled study.地西泮与苯哌啶用于上消化道内镜检查术前用药的比较:一项随机双盲对照研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;22(2):143-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00542459.
9
[Intravenous sedation for gastroscopy: comparison between midazolam and diazepam].[胃镜检查的静脉镇静:咪达唑仑与地西泮的比较]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1984;3(6):430-4. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(84)80140-9.
10
Sedation for gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and Diazemuls in patients with and without cirrhosis.胃镜检查的镇静:咪达唑仑和地西泮乳剂在肝硬化和非肝硬化患者中的对比研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Dec;22(6):643-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb02952.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Midazolam and Diazepam for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Double-Balloon Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.咪达唑仑与地西泮用于双气囊内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者镇静的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 27;14(7):2287. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072287.
2
Sedation level with midazolam: A pediatric surgery approach.咪达唑仑的镇静水平:一种小儿外科手术方法。
Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Jul;30(7):906-917. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Medical, Political, and Economic Considerations for the Use of MAC for Endoscopic Sedation: Big Price, Little Justification?
使用 MAC 进行内镜镇静的医学、政治和经济考虑:高价格,低理由?
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2466-2472. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06464-3.
4
A Novel Research Method for Determining Sedative Exposure in Critically Ill Patients.一种用于确定重症患者镇静剂暴露量的新型研究方法。
Nurs Res. 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):73-79. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000322.
5
Midazolam for sedation before procedures.咪达唑仑用于操作前镇静。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 20;2016(5):CD009491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009491.pub2.
6
Are Histrionic Personality Traits Associated with Irritability during Conscious Sedation Endoscopy?表演型人格特质与清醒镇静内镜检查期间的易怒情绪有关吗?
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:702492. doi: 10.1155/2015/702492. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
7
Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in infants and children.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998 Jul;35(1):37-47. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199835010-00003.
8
Rectal administration of midazolam versus diazepam for preanesthetic sedation in children.咪达唑仑与地西泮直肠给药用于儿童麻醉前镇静的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;37(1):29-31.