Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 14;14(9):e0008655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Anthrax threatens human and animal health, and people's livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears. We investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI 95% [84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI 95% [96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI 95% [84-97%] and 98%, CI 95% [95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI 95% [90-98%] and 95%, CI 95% [87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature. Azure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.
炭疽病威胁着非洲和亚洲许多农村社区的人类和动物健康以及民生。在这些地区,现场检测工具的缺乏对炭疽病监测构成了挑战。此外,文化习俗和基础设施可能会影响样本的可用性和质量。为了量化炭疽病的影响,非常需要实用且准确的诊断解决方案。我们验证了在现场采集的血涂片上检测炭疽芽孢杆菌的显微镜和分子方法,并确定了在没有血涂片的情况下适合炭疽病确认的替代样本。我们调查了坦桑尼亚北部疑似炭疽病引起的牲畜死亡。使用四种染色技术以及聚合酶链反应(PCR)后进行贝叶斯潜在类别分析,对现场制备的血涂片(n = 152)进行显微镜检测。使用 Azure B 的显微镜检查的中位敏感性(91%,95%CI [84-96%])和特异性(99%,95%CI [96-100%])与推荐标准多色亚甲蓝(PMB)相当(92%,95%CI [84-97%]和 98%,95%CI [95-100%]),但 Azure B 更易获得且更方便。其他常用的染色剂效果不佳。由于当地习俗和条件,只有不到 50%的疑似炭疽病病例可以获得血涂片。然而,从皮肤提取的 DNA 提取物上进行的 PCR 检测具有高敏感性和特异性(95%,95%CI [90-98%]和 95%,95%CI [87-99%]),即使在环境温度下长时间储存后也是如此。Azure B 显微镜检查代表了一种可在基本实验室基础设施和现场进行的动物炭疽病准确诊断测试。当无法获得血涂片时,使用皮肤组织进行 PCR 检测提供了一种有价值的确认替代方法。我们的研究结果为资源匮乏地区的炭疽病提供了一种实用的诊断方法,可支持全球炭疽病流行国家的监测和控制工作。