• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际选择标准的定期修订:过程和结果。

Periodic Revisions of the International Choices Criteria: Process and Results.

机构信息

Choices International Foundation, 2501 HE The Hague, The Netherlands.

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):2774. doi: 10.3390/nu12092774.

DOI:10.3390/nu12092774
PMID:32932836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551836/
Abstract

Unhealthy diets contribute to an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, which are the leading causes of deaths worldwide. Nutrition policies such as front-of-pack labeling have been developed and implemented globally in different countries to stimulate healthier diets. The Choices Programme, including the International Choices criteria, is an established tool to support the implementation of such policies. The Choices criteria were developed to define the healthier choices per product group, taking saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, sodium, sugars, energy, and fiber into account. To keep these criteria updated, they are periodically revised by an independent international scientific committee. This paper explains the most important changes resulting from revisions between 2010 and 2016 and describes the process of the latest revision, resulting in the International Choices criteria version 2019. Revisions were based on national and international nutrition and dietary recommendations, large food composition databases, and stakeholders' feedback. Other nutrient profiling systems served as benchmarks. The product group classification was adapted and new criteria were determined in order to enhance global applicability and form a credible, intuitively logical system for users. These newly developed criteria will serve as an international standard for healthier products and provide a guiding framework for food and nutrition policies.

摘要

不健康的饮食会增加罹患非传染性疾病的风险,此类疾病是目前全球的主要死因。为了促进更健康的饮食,全球各国都制定并实施了营养政策,例如在包装正面进行标签标注。选择计划(包括国际选择标准)是支持此类政策实施的既定工具。选择标准是为了确定每个产品组中更健康的选择,同时考虑到饱和脂肪酸、反式脂肪酸、钠、糖、能量和纤维的含量。为了保持这些标准的更新,一个独立的国际科学委员会会定期对其进行修订。本文解释了 2010 年至 2016 年修订版中产生的最重要的变化,并描述了最新修订版的过程,由此产生了 2019 年版的国际选择标准。修订版的依据是国家和国际营养和饮食建议、大型食品成分数据库以及利益相关者的反馈。其他营养成分分析系统则作为基准。为了提高全球适用性并为用户提供一个可信、直观逻辑的系统,对产品组分类进行了调整,并确定了新的标准。这些新制定的标准将作为更健康产品的国际标准,并为食品和营养政策提供指导框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9839/7551836/55d2c6c9e4ce/nutrients-12-02774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9839/7551836/a8ae9f6fa024/nutrients-12-02774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9839/7551836/55d2c6c9e4ce/nutrients-12-02774-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9839/7551836/a8ae9f6fa024/nutrients-12-02774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9839/7551836/55d2c6c9e4ce/nutrients-12-02774-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Periodic Revisions of the International Choices Criteria: Process and Results.国际选择标准的定期修订:过程和结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):2774. doi: 10.3390/nu12092774.
2
Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand.自愿性的包装食品营养标签系统对食品配方调整的影响:新西兰的“星级营养评分系统”。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 22;9(8):918. doi: 10.3390/nu9080918.
3
Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.
4
World Heart Federation Policy Brief: Front-Of-Pack Labelling: Unhealthy Changes in the Global Food System.世界心脏联盟政策简报:包装正面标签:全球食品系统中的不健康变化
Glob Heart. 2020 Oct 16;15(1):70. doi: 10.5334/gh.935.
5
Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme.开发国际包装食品标签系统标准:国际选择计划。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Nov;65(11):1190-200. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.101. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
6
The use of food composition data in the Choices International Programme.国际选择计划中食物成分数据的使用。
Food Chem. 2016 Feb 15;193:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.082. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy.“选择”计划:一种简单的包装正面标识,让健康选择变得轻松。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17 Suppl 1:383-6.
8
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
9
"Front-of-pack" nutrition labeling."包装正面"营养标签。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Oct 28;31(11):2989-2992. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.预包装标签方案能否引导更健康的食物选择?澳大利亚购物者对七种标签格式的反应。
Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Scheme after 5 Years of Adoption in Thailand: An Analysis of New Launched Pre-Packaged Food and Beverages Products.泰国采用预包装食品和饮料产品的营养标签方案 5 年后的采纳情况:新推出产品的分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 12;15(14):3116. doi: 10.3390/nu15143116.
2
Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.《Choices Five-Level Criteria 与 Nutri-Score 比较:与荷兰基于食物的膳食指南一致》
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):3527. doi: 10.3390/nu14173527.
3
Key Stakeholder Perspectives on Introducing a Front-of-Pack Labelling Scheme on Packaged Foods in China: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of a front-of-pack nutrition label on product reformulation: A ten-year evaluation of the Dutch Choices programme.包装正面营养标签对产品重新配方的影响:荷兰“选择”计划的十年评估
Food Chem X. 2020 Mar 25;6:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2020.100086. eCollection 2020 Jun 30.
2
Front-of-package food labels: A narrative review.包装食品标签:叙述性评价。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104485. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104485. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Differences and Similarities between Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels in Europe: A Comparison of Functional and Visual Aspects.
中国引入包装食品的前包装标签计划的主要利益相关者观点:一项定性研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 25;14(3):516. doi: 10.3390/nu14030516.
4
Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.
欧洲预包装食品营养标签的差异与相似之处:功能性和视觉方面的比较。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):626. doi: 10.3390/nu11030626.
4
Assessing the in vivo data on low/no-calorie sweeteners and the gut microbiota.评估低/无热量甜味剂和肠道微生物群的体内数据。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Feb;124:385-399. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
How well do plant based alternatives fare nutritionally compared to cow's milk?与牛奶相比,植物性替代品在营养方面表现如何?
J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;55(1):10-20. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2915-y. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Nuts and Human Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.坚果与人类健康结局:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2017 Dec 2;9(12):1311. doi: 10.3390/nu9121311.
7
Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape.非营养性甜味剂的健康结果:研究现状分析。
Nutr J. 2017 Sep 8;16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0278-x.
8
Are edible insects more or less 'healthy' than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition.食用昆虫比常见肉类“更健康”还是“更不健康”?使用为应对营养过剩和营养不良而开发的两种营养成分分析模型进行的比较。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;70(3):285-91. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.149. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
9
Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota.人工甜味剂通过改变肠道微生物群诱导葡萄糖不耐受。
Nature. 2014 Oct 9;514(7521):181-6. doi: 10.1038/nature13793. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.含糖饮料与儿童和成人的体重增加:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;98(4):1084-102. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.058362. Epub 2013 Aug 21.