• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《Choices Five-Level Criteria 与 Nutri-Score 比较:与荷兰基于食物的膳食指南一致》

Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Health, HAS University of Applied Sciences, 5200 MA 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Choices International Foundation, 7084 AV Breedenbroek, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):3527. doi: 10.3390/nu14173527.

DOI:10.3390/nu14173527
PMID:36079785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9460444/
Abstract

The current food environment in The Netherlands is considered obesogenic. Eighty percent of the products in supermarkets are unhealthy. The Wheel of Five is the well-established, science-based Dutch food-based dietary guideline (FBDG) developed to stimulate healthier choices. In addition, simple directions on food packaging, such as front-of-package (FOP) health logos, could also be helpful. However, these tools should be in line with each other, in order not to confuse the consumer. To study this, we evaluated two FOP nutrient profiling systems (NPSs) for their alignment with the Wheel of Five: Choices five-level criteria and Nutri-Score. For this, a small but representative sample of 124 products was selected from the Dutch food composition database (NEVO). For these products, the scores for Choices and Nutri-Score were calculated using the published criteria, while compliance with the Wheel of Five was established by using the criteria from Netherlands Nutrition Center (NNC). The Wheel of Five food groups were used to categorize the products. Differences between the Wheel of Five and Choices are smaller than with Nutri-Score, concluding that Choices is more consistent with the Wheel of Five and might be an attractive alternation for a FOP health logo on the Dutch market.

摘要

目前荷兰的食品环境被认为是致肥胖的。超市里 80%的产品都不健康。“五轮”是一种经过充分验证的、基于科学的荷兰食品膳食指南(FBDG),旨在鼓励人们做出更健康的选择。此外,食品包装上简单的指导说明,如包装正面(FOP)健康标志,也可能会有所帮助。然而,这些工具应该相互协调一致,以免让消费者感到困惑。为了研究这一点,我们评估了两种 FOP 营养成分分析系统(NPS)与“五轮”的一致性:Choices 五级标准和 Nutri-Score。为此,从荷兰食品成分数据库(NEVO)中选择了一个小但具有代表性的 124 种产品的样本。对于这些产品,使用已发布的标准计算了 Choices 和 Nutri-Score 的分数,而使用荷兰营养中心(NNC)的标准来确定产品是否符合“五轮”。使用“五轮”食品组来对产品进行分类。“五轮”与 Choices 之间的差异比与 Nutri-Score 之间的差异要小,这表明 Choices 与“五轮”更为一致,可能是荷兰市场 FOP 健康标志的一个有吸引力的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.《Choices Five-Level Criteria 与 Nutri-Score 比较:与荷兰基于食物的膳食指南一致》
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):3527. doi: 10.3390/nu14173527.
2
Evaluation of Nutri-Score in Relation to Dietary Guidelines and Food Reformulation in The Netherlands.评估 Nutri-Score 与荷兰饮食指南和食品配方改革的关系。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 17;13(12):4536. doi: 10.3390/nu13124536.
3
The impact of the nutri-score on food choice: A choice experiment in a Dutch supermarket.营养评分对食品选择的影响:荷兰超市的选择实验。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105664. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105664. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Consistency of the Initial and Updated Version of the Nutri-Score with Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: A French Perspective.营养评分初始版与更新版与基于食物的膳食指南的一致性:法国视角
J Nutr. 2024 Mar;154(3):1027-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
The Nutri-Score nutrition label.营养评分(Nutri-Score)营养标签。
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2022 Jul;92(3-4):147-157. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000722. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Front-of-package food labels: A narrative review.包装食品标签:叙述性评价。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104485. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104485. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.
8
Nutri-Score: Awareness, Perception and Self-Reported Impact on Food Choices among French Adolescents.Nutri-Score:法国青少年对营养评分的认知、感知及其对食物选择的自我报告影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 29;14(15):3119. doi: 10.3390/nu14153119.
9
How does the updated Nutri-Score discriminate and classify the nutritional quality of foods in a Norwegian setting?新版 Nutri-Score 如何在挪威环境下区分和分类食物的营养质量?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Oct 10;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01525-y.
10
The use of food swaps to encourage healthier online food choices: a randomized controlled trial.用食物交换鼓励更健康的在线食物选择:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Dec 4;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01222-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Nutrient Profiling of Swedish Food Products-A Study of the Alignment of the Multi-Level Criteria for the Choices and Nutri-Score Systems with the Nordic Keyhole Logo.瑞典食品的营养成分分析——关于选择的多层次标准和营养评分系统与北欧钥匙孔标志一致性的研究
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 24;17(3):421. doi: 10.3390/nu17030421.
2
Giving fruits and vegetables a tax break: lessons from a Dutch attempt.给水果和蔬菜减税:荷兰的尝试带来的经验教训。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Feb 15;27(1):e70. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000442.
3
A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Nutri-Score in Relation to Dietary Guidelines and Food Reformulation in The Netherlands.评估 Nutri-Score 与荷兰饮食指南和食品配方改革的关系。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 17;13(12):4536. doi: 10.3390/nu13124536.
2
Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.
3
Role of food nutrients and supplementation in fighting against viral infections and boosting immunity: A review.
《小小鸟告诉我……欧洲上空的 Nutri-Score 全景图:连接科学与社会》
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 28;15(15):3367. doi: 10.3390/nu15153367.
4
Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Comparing the Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score in a Swedish Context.包装正面营养标签:在瑞典背景下比较北欧关键孔和营养评分。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 9;15(4):873. doi: 10.3390/nu15040873.
食物营养素及补充剂在对抗病毒感染和增强免疫力中的作用:综述
Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021 Apr;110:66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.069. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Association between nutritional profiles of foods underlying Nutri-Score front-of-pack labels and mortality: EPIC cohort study in 10 European countries.基于 Nutri-Score 标签的食品营养概况与死亡率之间的关联:10 个欧洲国家的 EPIC 队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 16;370:m3173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3173.
5
Periodic Revisions of the International Choices Criteria: Process and Results.国际选择标准的定期修订:过程和结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):2774. doi: 10.3390/nu12092774.
6
Performance of the Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label Nutri-Score to Discriminate the Nutritional Quality of Foods Products: A Comparative Study across 8 European Countries.《预包装食品营养标签 Nutri-Score 对食品营养质量的区分性能:8 个欧洲国家的比较研究》
Nutrients. 2020 May 2;12(5):1303. doi: 10.3390/nu12051303.
7
Defining a Healthy Diet: Evidence for The Role of Contemporary Dietary Patterns in Health and Disease.定义健康饮食:当代饮食模式在健康和疾病中的作用证据。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):334. doi: 10.3390/nu12020334.
8
Development of healthy and sustainable food-based dietary guidelines for the Netherlands.制定荷兰健康和可持续的基于食物的膳食指南。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Sep;22(13):2419-2435. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001435. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
A Global Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.全球食物膳食指南综述。
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;10(4):590-605. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy130.
10
Differences and Similarities between Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels in Europe: A Comparison of Functional and Visual Aspects.欧洲预包装食品营养标签的差异与相似之处:功能性和视觉方面的比较。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):626. doi: 10.3390/nu11030626.