• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。

Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.

机构信息

Choices International Foundation, 2501 HE The Hague, The Netherlands.

School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, 541 28 Skövde, Sweden.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.

DOI:10.3390/nu13124509
PMID:34960059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8705685/
Abstract

In 2008, the Choices International Foundation developed its logo criteria, identifying best-in-class food products. More advanced, global and graded nutrient profiling systems (NPSs) are needed to substantiate different national nutrition policies. The objective of this work was to extend Choices NPS to identify five levels of the healthiness of food products, so that the Choices NPS can also be used to support other nutrition policies, next to front-of-pack labelling. Based on the same principles as the previous logo criteria, four sets of threshold criteria were determined using a combination of compliance levels, calculated from a large international food group-specific database, the Choices logo criteria, and WHO-NPSs developed to restrict marketing to children. Validation consisted of a comparison with indicator foods from food-based dietary guidelines from various countries. Some thresholds were adjusted after the validation, e.g., because intermediate thresholds were too lenient. This resulted in a new international NPS that can be applied to different contexts and to support a variety of health policies, to prevent both undernutrition and obesity. It can efficiently evaluate mixed food products and represents a flexible tool, applicable in various settings and populations.

摘要

2008 年,国际选择基金会制定了其徽标标准,以确定最佳的食品产品。需要更先进、更全球化和分级的营养成分谱系统(NPS)来证实不同国家的营养政策。这项工作的目的是扩展 Choices NPS 以确定食品产品的五个健康水平,以便 Choices NPS 也可以用于支持其他营养政策,除了包装正面标签外。基于与之前徽标标准相同的原则,使用符合标准水平的组合,从一个大型国际特定食品组的数据库、Choices 徽标标准和世界卫生组织制定的限制向儿童营销的 NPS 中确定了四套阈值标准。验证包括与来自不同国家的基于食物的膳食指南的指示性食物进行比较。一些阈值在验证后进行了调整,例如,因为中间阈值过于宽松。这导致了一个新的国际 NPS,可以应用于不同的情况和支持各种健康政策,以预防营养不良和肥胖。它可以有效地评估混合食品,并代表一种灵活的工具,适用于各种环境和人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/cee20be897a1/nutrients-13-04509-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/2f0f4d799a7d/nutrients-13-04509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/700b39a1d7cd/nutrients-13-04509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/40ebb51d103e/nutrients-13-04509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/6835de229091/nutrients-13-04509-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/93a455dd1455/nutrients-13-04509-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/cee20be897a1/nutrients-13-04509-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/2f0f4d799a7d/nutrients-13-04509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/700b39a1d7cd/nutrients-13-04509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/40ebb51d103e/nutrients-13-04509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/6835de229091/nutrients-13-04509-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/93a455dd1455/nutrients-13-04509-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c47a/8705685/cee20be897a1/nutrients-13-04509-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Choices 5-Level Criteria to Support Multiple Food System Actions.支持多种食物系统行动的 Choices 5 级标准的制定。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):4509. doi: 10.3390/nu13124509.
2
Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.《Choices Five-Level Criteria 与 Nutri-Score 比较:与荷兰基于食物的膳食指南一致》
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):3527. doi: 10.3390/nu14173527.
3
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
4
Nutrient Profiling Systems, Front of Pack Labeling, and Consumer Behavior.营养成分分析系统、包装正面标签和消费者行为。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020 Jun 18;22(8):36. doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-00857-5.
5
Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: A Position Statement of the European Academy of Paediatrics and the European Childhood Obesity Group.《营养标签前置:欧洲儿科学会和欧洲儿童肥胖组织立场声明》
Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77(1):23-28. doi: 10.1159/000514336. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.预包装标签方案能否引导更健康的食物选择?澳大利亚购物者对七种标签格式的反应。
Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
7
Effectiveness of interpretive front-of-pack nutritional labelling schemes on the promotion of healthier food choices: a systematic review.解读型营养标签在促进更健康食品选择方面的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):24-37. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000214.
8
An assessment of nutrition information on front of pack labels and healthiness of foods in the United Kingdom retail market.对英国零售市场包装正面标签上的营养信息及食品健康性的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10255-4.
9
Nutrient profiling for front of pack labelling: how to align logical consumer choice with improvement of products?用于包装正面标签的营养成分分析:如何使符合逻辑的消费者选择与产品改进相一致?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):247-254. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000337.
10
Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool?营养标签是否是一种健康政策工具?
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 11;14(4):771. doi: 10.3390/nu14040771.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the healthfulness of pre-packaged beverages and investigating sugar thresholds for revising front-of-pack labels: a case study in Thailand.评估预包装饮料的健康程度并研究用于修订包装正面标签的糖分阈值:泰国的一个案例研究
Front Nutr. 2025 Jun 2;12:1564216. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1564216. eCollection 2025.
2
The Nutrient Profiling of Swedish Food Products-A Study of the Alignment of the Multi-Level Criteria for the Choices and Nutri-Score Systems with the Nordic Keyhole Logo.瑞典食品的营养成分分析——关于选择的多层次标准和营养评分系统与北欧钥匙孔标志一致性的研究
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 24;17(3):421. doi: 10.3390/nu17030421.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in UK meat consumption: analysis of data from years 1-11 (2008-09 to 2018-19) of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme.英国肉类消费趋势:国家饮食与营养调查滚动项目第 1-11 年(2008-09 至 2018-19 年)数据分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Oct;5(10):e699-e708. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00228-X.
2
The Intertwined Relationship Between Malnutrition and Poverty.营养不良与贫困的交织关系。
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;8:453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00453. eCollection 2020.
3
Association between nutritional profiles of foods underlying Nutri-Score front-of-pack labels and mortality: EPIC cohort study in 10 European countries.
Current Insights into Industrial Trans Fatty Acids Legal Frameworks and Health Challenges in the European Union and Spain.
欧盟和西班牙工业反式脂肪酸法律框架与健康挑战的当前见解
Foods. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):3845. doi: 10.3390/foods13233845.
4
Development of a Nutrient Profiling Model for Processed Foods in Japan.日本加工食品营养成分分析模型的建立。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 7;16(17):3026. doi: 10.3390/nu16173026.
5
Uptake of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Scheme after 5 Years of Adoption in Thailand: An Analysis of New Launched Pre-Packaged Food and Beverages Products.泰国采用预包装食品和饮料产品的营养标签方案 5 年后的采纳情况:新推出产品的分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 12;15(14):3116. doi: 10.3390/nu15143116.
6
Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.《Choices Five-Level Criteria 与 Nutri-Score 比较:与荷兰基于食物的膳食指南一致》
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 26;14(17):3527. doi: 10.3390/nu14173527.
7
The Nutri-Score algorithm: Evaluation of its validation process.营养评分算法:对其验证过程的评估。
Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 15;9:974003. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.974003. eCollection 2022.
基于 Nutri-Score 标签的食品营养概况与死亡率之间的关联:10 个欧洲国家的 EPIC 队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 16;370:m3173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3173.
4
Periodic Revisions of the International Choices Criteria: Process and Results.国际选择标准的定期修订:过程和结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 11;12(9):2774. doi: 10.3390/nu12092774.
5
The influence of a front-of-pack nutrition label on product reformulation: A ten-year evaluation of the Dutch Choices programme.包装正面营养标签对产品重新配方的影响:荷兰“选择”计划的十年评估
Food Chem X. 2020 Mar 25;6:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2020.100086. eCollection 2020 Jun 30.
6
Double-duty actions: seizing programme and policy opportunities to address malnutrition in all its forms.双重行动:抓住项目和政策机会,解决所有形式的营养不良问题。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 11;395(10218):142-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32506-1. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
7
The effects of voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels on volume shares of products: the case of the Dutch Choices.自愿性包装营养标签对产品份额的影响:荷兰 Choices 的案例。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(15):2879-2890. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001423. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Food-Based Dietary Guidelines around the World: Eastern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Countries.世界范围内的基于食物的膳食指南:东地中海和中东国家。
Nutrients. 2019 Jun 13;11(6):1325. doi: 10.3390/nu11061325.
9
A Global Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.全球食物膳食指南综述。
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;10(4):590-605. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy130.
10
The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report.肥胖、营养不良与气候变化的全球综合征:《柳叶刀》委员会报告
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):791-846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8. Epub 2019 Jan 27.