• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性下背痛患者的EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2效用评分:来自魁北克的一项调查

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores in people living with chronic low back pain: a survey from Quebec.

作者信息

Poder Thomas G, Wang Liang, Carrier Nathalie

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada

Centre de recherche de l'IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 15;10(9):e035722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035722.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035722
PMID:32933957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7493112/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe how chronic low back pain (CLBP) impacts on utility scores and which patients' characteristics most affect these scores in the province of Quebec.

SETTINGS

Province of Quebec, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

569 adult patients with CLBP.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

An online survey on low back pain was conducted between October 2018 and January 2019. The EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) and the Short Form Six Dimensions version 2 (SF-6Dv2) are two generic preference-based measures used to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and provide quality-adjusted life-year utility values.

RESULTS

The number of subjects who agreed to participate was 610, but 41 were excluded because 8 had low back pain for less than 3 months and 33 did not start the survey. A total of 569 subjects were analysed, but only 410 completed the survey up to the EQ-5D-5L or SF-6Dv2 sections. Median (range) of EQ-5D-5L was 0.622 (-0.072 to 0.905), and mean (range) of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-Visual Analogue Scale was 0.561 (0.301-0.829) and 51.0 (0-100), respectively. In all multivariate models, health or life satisfaction increased the health utility score, while pain reduced it. Co-occurring health problems were present for a majority (68%) of participants, mainly fatigue/insomnia (57.4%), musculoskeletal disorder (56.2%) and mental disorder (44%).

CONCLUSION

This study provided utility scores with EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in patients with CLBP in Quebec, and results were similar to other studies conducted in different settings. These values were well below those reported in the Quebec general population and highlight the association between CLBP and HRQoL.

摘要

目的

描述慢性下腰痛(CLBP)如何影响效用评分,以及在魁北克省哪些患者特征对这些评分影响最大。

设置

加拿大魁北克省。

参与者

569名成年CLBP患者。

方法与结果

2018年10月至2019年1月进行了一项关于下腰痛的在线调查。欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)和简式六维量表第2版(SF-6Dv2)是两种基于偏好的通用测量方法,用于评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)并提供质量调整生命年效用值。

结果

同意参与的受试者有610名,但41名被排除,原因是8名下腰痛时间少于3个月,33名未开始调查。共分析了569名受试者,但只有410名完成了直至EQ-5D-5L或SF-6Dv2部分的调查。EQ-5D-5L的中位数(范围)为0.622(-0.072至0.905),SF-6Dv2和EQ视觉模拟量表的均值(范围)分别为0.561(0.301 - 0.829)和51.0(0 - 100)。在所有多变量模型中,健康或生活满意度提高了健康效用评分,而疼痛则降低了该评分。大多数(68%)参与者存在并发健康问题,主要是疲劳/失眠(57.4%)、肌肉骨骼疾病(56.2%)和精神障碍(44%)。

结论

本研究提供了魁北克CLBP患者的EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2效用评分,结果与在不同环境中进行的其他研究相似。这些值远低于魁北克普通人群报告的值,并突出了CLBP与HRQoL之间的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5560/7493112/cd81b99be555/bmjopen-2019-035722f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5560/7493112/cd81b99be555/bmjopen-2019-035722f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5560/7493112/cd81b99be555/bmjopen-2019-035722f01.jpg

相似文献

1
EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores in people living with chronic low back pain: a survey from Quebec.慢性下背痛患者的EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2效用评分:来自魁北克的一项调查
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 15;10(9):e035722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035722.
2
EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China.中国弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6Dv2 健康效用评分。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 19;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02297-0.
3
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.
4
Population Norms for SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in China.中国 SF-6Dv2 和 EQ-5D-5L 的人群常模。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):573-585. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00715-2. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey.SF-6Dv2 和 EQ-5D-5L 在中国人群健康调查中的测量性能比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jun 16;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02003-y.
6
Psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6DV2 in measuring health status of populations in Chinese university staff and students.EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6Dv2 在测量中国高校教职工和学生人群健康状况的心理计量学性能。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):2314. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17208-z.
7
Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in COVID-19 Patients in China.在中国 COVID-19 患者中比较 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6Dv2 的测量特性。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Jul;22(4):555-568. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00881-5. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
8
Comparison of the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among overweight and obesity populations in China.比较 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6Dv2 在超重和肥胖人群中的测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Oct 31;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02202-1.
9
Mapping IWQOL-Lite onto EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among overweight and obese population in China.中国超重和肥胖人群中IWQOL-Lite量表与EQ-5D-5L量表及SF-6Dv2量表的映射研究
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):817-829. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03568-x. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
Comparative performance and mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese general population.中国一般人群中 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6Dv2 之间的比较性能和映射算法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Feb;25(1):7-19. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01566-x. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in Chinese patients on dialysis.中国透析患者中EQ-5D-5L与SF-6Dv2测量属性的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 10;23(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02403-w.
2
Quality of life following Shouldice Repair: a prospective cohort study among inguinal hernia patients.Shouldice 修复术后的生活质量:腹股沟疝患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 23;29(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03217-3.
3
Validation of the arabic version of the EuroQol-5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5 L) in patients with spinal degenerative diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
Quebec Health-Related Quality-of-Life Population Norms Using the EQ-5D-5L: Decomposition by Sociodemographic Data and Health Problems.魁北克健康相关生活质量人群规范使用 EQ-5D-5L:按社会人口学数据和健康问题进行分解。
Value Health. 2020 Feb;23(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
The Quebec Low Back Pain Study: a protocol for an innovative 2-tier provincial cohort.魁北克下背痛研究:一项创新的两级省级队列研究方案。
Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 19;5(1):e799. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000799. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
3
A discrete choice experiment on preferences of patients with low back pain about non-surgical treatments: identification, refinement and selection of attributes and levels.
阿拉伯语版欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)在脊柱退行性疾病患者中的效度验证
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18367-3.
4
Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6Dv2 in patients with late-onset Pompe disease.迟发性庞贝病患者的 EQ-5D-3L、EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6Dv2 的测量特性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Dec;25(9):1505-1515. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01682-2. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Comparative performance and mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese general population.中国一般人群中 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6Dv2 之间的比较性能和映射算法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Feb;25(1):7-19. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01566-x. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with a Musculoskeletal Disorder.因肌肉骨骼疾病到急诊科就诊患者的健康相关生活质量
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Feb 19;14:91-103. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S348138. eCollection 2022.
7
Rasch Validation of the VF-14 Scale of Vision-Specific Functioning in Greek Patients.希腊患者视觉特定功能VF-14量表的Rasch效度验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;18(8):4254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084254.
8
Self-Reported Satisfaction to Treatment, Quality of Life and General Health of Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Inadequate Glycemic Control from North-Eastern Romania.罗马尼亚东北部血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗满意度、生活质量和总体健康的自我报告。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 21;18(6):3249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063249.
一项关于腰痛患者对非手术治疗偏好的离散选择实验:属性及水平的识别、优化与选择
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jun 12;13:933-940. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S201401. eCollection 2019.
4
Consistency Between Three Different Ways of Administering the Short Form 6 Dimension Version 2.三种不同方式施测短式 6 维度版本 2 的一致性。
Value Health. 2019 Jul;22(7):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set.采用 EQ-5D-5L 量表测量的健康相关生活质量:基于代表性德国人群样本和效价设定的规范指数值估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):933-944. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.中文腰痛患者 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6D 的头对头比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1137-6.
7
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.
8
Challenges to make cost-effectiveness studies usable by decision makers.使成本效益研究能被决策者所用面临的挑战。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1931-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.062.
9
The Influence of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Pain, Quality of Life, and Depression in Patients Receiving Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.认知行为疗法对慢性下腰痛接受物理治疗患者的疼痛、生活质量和抑郁的影响:一项系统综述。
PM R. 2019 Feb;11(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.09.029. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.什么是下背痛以及为什么我们需要关注它。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.