Takada Koji, Kashiwagi Shinichiro, Asano Yuka, Goto Wataru, Morisaki Tamami, Takahashi Katsuyuki, Shibutani Masatsune, Amano Ryosuke, Takashima Tsutomu, Tomita Shuhei, Hirakawa Kosei, Ohira Masaichi
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Department of Pharmacology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Oncol Lett. 2020 Nov;20(5):180. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12041. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Currently, when determining treatment regimens, there is an emphasis on the quality of life (QOL), in addition to treatment efficacy. Especially in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases, unless death is imminent, a common first-line treatment is endocrine therapy, which has fewer side effects. In the present study, the differences in QOL were evaluated based on the age and prognostic indicators of 46 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases (stage IV), who received first-line endocrine therapy at the Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between November 2007 and November 2016. QOL score before and after endocrine therapy was retrospectively analyzed, using the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs-Breast (QOL-ACD-B). There was no significant association between age and any of the clinicopathological features investigated. However, the QOL score of the elderly patient group was significantly higher compared with that of the younger group in the 'Satisfaction with treatment and coping with disease' subcategory (P=0.008). The QOL score of the younger age group in the same subcategory was significantly improved by the treatment (P=0.013). The patients that had an increased overall QOL score 3 months after treatment initiation had a significant extension of progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared to the patients with decreased or no change in QOL (P=0.032). In conclusion, psychological stress was more prominent in younger patients with stage IV breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy compared with elderly patients. Importantly, improving QOL within the 3 months after treatment initiation could lead to longer PFS rate.
目前,在确定治疗方案时,除了治疗效果外,还强调生活质量(QOL)。特别是在伴有远处转移的激素受体阳性乳腺癌中,除非死亡临近,常见的一线治疗是内分泌治疗,其副作用较少。在本研究中,对2007年11月至2016年11月期间在日本大阪市立大学医院接受一线内分泌治疗的46例伴有远处转移(IV期)的激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的年龄和预后指标进行了评估,以分析生活质量的差异。使用抗癌药物治疗癌症患者生活质量问卷-乳腺癌(QOL-ACD-B)对内分泌治疗前后的生活质量评分进行回顾性分析。年龄与所调查的任何临床病理特征之间均无显著关联。然而,在“对治疗的满意度和应对疾病”子类别中,老年患者组的生活质量评分显著高于年轻组(P=0.008)。治疗使同子类别中年轻年龄组的生活质量评分显著提高(P=0.013)。与生活质量降低或无变化的患者相比,治疗开始后3个月总体生活质量评分增加的患者无进展生存期(PFS)率显著延长(P=0.032)。总之,与老年患者相比,接受激素治疗的IV期乳腺癌年轻患者的心理压力更为突出。重要的是,在治疗开始后的3个月内改善生活质量可能会导致更长的无进展生存期。