Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):983-990. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0343. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Most U.S. states require written notification of breast density after mammograms, yet effects of notifications on knowledge are mixed. Little is known about potential misunderstandings. We used a sequential mixed-methods study design to assess women's knowledge about breast density, after receiving a notification. We conducted a telephone survey among a racially/ethnically and health-literacy level diverse sample ( = 754) and qualitative interviews with 61 survey respondents. In survey results, 58% of women correctly indicated that breast density is not related to touch, with higher accuracy among non-Hispanic White women and those with greater health literacy. Next, 87% of women recognized that breast density is identified visually mammogram, with no significant differences in responses by race/ethnicity or health literacy. Most (81%) women recognized that a relationship exists between breast tissue types and density; Non-Hispanic White women were less likely to respond correctly. Only 47% of women correctly indicated that having dense breasts increases one's risk of breast cancer; women with low health literacy were more often correct. Qualitative results revealed additional dimensions of understanding: Some women incorrectly reported that density could be felt, or dense breasts were lumpier, thicker, or more compacted; others identified "dense" tissue as fatty. Interpretations of risk included that breast density was an early form of breast cancer. We found areas of consistent knowledge and identified misperceptions surrounding breast density across race/ethnicity and health literacy levels. Further education to address disparities and correct misunderstandings is essential to promote better knowledge, to foster informed decisions.
大多数美国州在乳房 X 光检查后都要求书面通知乳房密度,但通知对知识的影响却存在差异。对于潜在的误解知之甚少。我们采用了顺序混合方法研究设计,在收到通知后评估女性对乳房密度的知识。我们对一个种族/民族和健康素养水平多样化的样本( = 754)进行了电话调查,并对 61 名调查受访者进行了定性访谈。在调查结果中,58%的女性正确指出乳房密度与触感无关,非西班牙裔白人女性和健康素养较高的女性准确率更高。接下来,87%的女性认识到乳房密度是通过乳房 X 光检查来识别的,种族/民族或健康素养没有显著差异。大多数(81%)女性认识到乳房组织类型和密度之间存在关系;非西班牙裔白人女性不太可能正确回答。只有 47%的女性正确指出乳房致密会增加患乳腺癌的风险;健康素养较低的女性往往更正确。定性结果揭示了理解的其他维度:一些女性错误地报告说密度可以感觉到,或者致密的乳房更结块、更厚或更紧实;其他人将“致密”组织识别为脂肪。对风险的解释包括乳房密度是乳腺癌的早期形式。我们发现了在种族/民族和健康素养水平上一致的知识领域,并确定了围绕乳房密度的误解。进一步开展教育以解决差异和纠正误解对于促进更好的知识、促进知情决策至关重要。