• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策能力:健康素养、情境因素与健康之间缺失的一环

Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health.

出版信息

Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e213-e223. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220718-01. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220718-01
PMID:36099035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469777/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy has often been described as an important precondition for good health decisions, healthy behaviors, and health. However, reviews reveal low evidence for intervention effectiveness through health literacy. This result calls for more investigations to be done in the pathway from health literacy to health, considering intermediate outcomes of health literacy.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores an important immediate objective of health literacy, namely the decision-making ability (DMA) regarding health issues. The study's hypothesis claims the DMA to be an important mediator between health literacy and health outcomes. Furthermore, the study assumes that the effect of the DMA on different health outcomes is not only contingent on health literacy but also on contextual factors. To test the above hypotheses, six different health literacy dimensions and four health outcomes have been analyzed.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from the Young Adult Survey Switzerland was used for mediation analyses ( = 4, 569, age, 18 to 25 years, all male). Multiple regression and KHB (Karlson, Holm, and Breen) decomposition analyses were applied to estimate mediation effects between health literacy and health outcomes.

KEY RESULTS

Five of six health literacy dimensions explained the DMA in a linear regression model. The coefficients of the DMA explaining health outcomes were substantially reduced when health literacy items were included into the models (6.1%-20.3%). Furthermore, the associations between health literacy and the health outcomes were fully explained by contextual factors, except in the mental health model.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the hypothesis that higher health literacy levels do not necessarily lead to better health directly. Rather, health literacy is just one of multiple factors contributing to a higher DMA and, further, to favorable health outcomes. The results of this study call for more investigations in the health decision-making process and the role of contextual factors. [] Plain Language Summary: The study investigated the ability to make good health decisions while considering health literacy. The results support the intermediate function of the decision-making ability on the path to favorable health outcomes. Furthermore, it is found that the DMA as well as health literacy are highly contingent on contextual factors. The results shed light into the complex decision-making process regarding health issues.

摘要

背景

健康素养常被描述为做出良好健康决策、采取健康行为和保持健康的重要前提。然而,健康素养干预效果的相关综述表明,目前的证据还不够充分。这一结果呼吁进一步深入研究健康素养与健康之间的关系,考虑健康素养的中间结果。

目的

本研究旨在探索健康素养的一个重要直接目标,即健康问题决策能力(DMA)。研究假设 DMA 是健康素养与健康结果之间的重要中介。此外,研究还假设 DMA 对不同健康结果的影响不仅取决于健康素养,还取决于情境因素。为了检验上述假设,本研究分析了六个不同的健康素养维度和四个健康结果。

方法

本研究使用瑞士青年调查的横断面数据进行中介分析(n=4569,年龄 18-25 岁,均为男性)。采用多元回归和 KHB(Karlson、Holm 和 Breen)分解分析来估计健康素养与健康结果之间的中介效应。

结果

在线性回归模型中,六个健康素养维度中的五个维度可以解释 DMA。当将健康素养项目纳入模型时,DMA 解释健康结果的系数显著降低(6.1%-20.3%)。此外,除心理健康模型外,健康素养与健康结果之间的关联可完全由情境因素解释。

结论

研究结果支持以下假设,即较高的健康素养水平不一定直接导致更好的健康。相反,健康素养只是导致更高 DMA 以及更有利健康结果的众多因素之一。本研究结果呼吁进一步研究健康决策过程以及情境因素的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/9469777/750abf91c559/10.3928_24748307-20220718-01-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/9469777/750abf91c559/10.3928_24748307-20220718-01-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/9469777/750abf91c559/10.3928_24748307-20220718-01-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision-Making Ability: A Missing Link Between Health Literacy, Contextual Factors, and Health.决策能力:健康素养、情境因素与健康之间缺失的一环
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Jul;6(3):e213-e223. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220718-01. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
The relationship between health literacy and health outcomes among male young adults: exploring confounding effects using decomposition analysis.健康素养与年轻男性健康结局的关系:使用分解分析探究混杂效应。
Int J Public Health. 2019 May;64(4):535-545. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01236-x. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
The role of health literacy in the association between social support and self-rated health: a Danish population-based study in 10,787 individuals with a long-term condition.健康素养在社会支持与自评健康之间的关系中的作用:一项针对 10787 名患有长期疾病的个体的丹麦基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):2739. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20223-3.
5
Challenging the association between health literacy and health: the role of conversion factors.挑战健康素养与健康之间的关联:转化因素的作用。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab054.
6
Health literacy among older adults in Switzerland: cross-sectional evidence from a nationally representative population-based observational study.瑞士老年人的健康素养:一项基于全国代表性人群观察研究的横断面证据。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Apr 5;152:w30158. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30158. eCollection 2022 Mar 28.
7
The Role of Health Literacy in Explaining the Relation between Educational Level and Decision Making about Colorectal Cancer Screening.健康素养在解释教育水平与结直肠癌筛查决策之间关系中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 22;16(23):4644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234644.
8
Associations between health literacy and information-evaluation and decision-making skills in Japanese adults.日本成年人健康素养与信息评估和决策技能之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):1473. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13892-5.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Assessment of Factors Associated With Parental Perceptions of Voluntary Decisions About Child Participation in Leukemia Clinical Trials.评估与父母对儿童参与白血病临床试验的自愿决策相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219038. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9038.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing sexual and reproductive health decision-making skills in underserved communities in Ghana: A quasi-experimental study.提升加纳服务欠缺社区的性与生殖健康决策技能:一项准实验研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;5(7):e0004733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004733. eCollection 2025.
2
An Ongoing Teacher Professional Development Programme to Enhance Critical Health Literacy Pedagogies and Assessment.一个持续进行的教师专业发展项目,以加强批判性健康素养教学法与评估。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e70016. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70016.
3
Barriers and facilitators of prevention of infections related to cancer: A systematic literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing performance-based measures of health literacy: A narrative case study and checklist of considerations.发展基于绩效的健康素养衡量标准:案例叙述研究与考量清单。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2406-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Health Literacy in the Everyday Lives of Older Adults in Greece, Hungary, and the Netherlands.
癌症相关感染预防的障碍与促进因素:一项系统文献综述
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 19;10(19):e37959. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37959. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
4
Predictive models for delay in medical decision-making among older patients with acute ischemic stroke: a comparative study using logistic regression analysis and lightGBM algorithm.基于逻辑回归分析和 LightGBM 算法的老年急性缺血性脑卒中患者医疗决策延误预测模型:一项比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1413. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18855-6.
5
Harnessing the power of mindset interventions in health promotion.利用心态干预在健康促进中的力量。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:461. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1757_23. eCollection 2023.
6
Health Literacy of People with Intellectual Disabilities: How Meaningful Is the Social Context for a Target Group-Oriented Model of Health Literacy?智障人士的健康素养:社会环境对以目标群体为导向的健康素养模型有何意义?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16052. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316052.
希腊、匈牙利和荷兰老年人日常生活中的健康素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;17(7):2411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072411.
4
The relationship between health literacy and health outcomes among male young adults: exploring confounding effects using decomposition analysis.健康素养与年轻男性健康结局的关系:使用分解分析探究混杂效应。
Int J Public Health. 2019 May;64(4):535-545. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01236-x. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare.健康素养作为一种社会实践:健康和医疗知识的社会和经验维度。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
6
Evidence on the effectiveness of health literacy interventions in the EU: a systematic review.欧盟健康素养干预措施有效性的证据:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1414. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6331-7.
7
Health Literacy in Context.情境中的健康素养
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 27;15(12):2657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122657.
8
Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review.健康素养是否介导了社会经济地位与健康差距之间的关系?综合综述。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):e1-e17. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day062.
9
Moving towards a Comprehensive Approach for Health Literacy Interventions: The Development of a Health Literacy Intervention Model.迈向健康素养干预的综合方法:健康素养干预模型的开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 15;15(6):1268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061268.
10
Health literacy in childhood and youth: a systematic review of definitions and models.儿童和青少年的健康素养:定义与模型的系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4267-y.