Suppr超能文献

圣保罗州姑息性镇静的患病率:一种新出现的医疗需求。

Prevalence of palliative sedation in the State of São Paulo: an emerging medical demand.

作者信息

Piedade Márjorie Anção Oliveira, Cardoso Filho Carlos Alberto, Priolli Denise Gonçalves

机构信息

Universidade São Francisco, Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil.

Escola de Educação Física e Esporte, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Sep 14;18:eAO5395. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5395. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of palliative sedation use and related factors.

METHODS

An observational study based on data collected via electronic questionnaire comprising 23 close-ended questions and sent to physicians living and working in the state of São Paulo. Demographic data, prevalence and frequency of palliative sedation use, participant's familiarity with the practice and related motivating factors were analyzed. In order to minimize memory bias, questions addressing use frequency and motivating factors were limited to the last year prior to survey completion date. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data.

RESULTS

In total, 20,168 e-mails were sent and 324 valid answers obtained, resulting in 2% adherence. The overall prevalence of palliative sedation use over the course of professional practice was 68%. However, only 48% of respondents reported having used palliative sedation during the last year, primarily to relieve pain (35%). The frequency of use ranged from one to six times (66%) during the study period and the main reason for not using was the lack of eligible patients (64%). Approximately 83% of physicians felt comfortable using palliative sedation but only 26% reported having specific academic training in this field.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of palliative sedation use is high, the primary indication being pain relief. However, frequency of use is low due to lack of eligible patients.

摘要

目的

调查姑息性镇静的使用情况及相关因素。

方法

一项观察性研究,基于通过电子问卷收集的数据,问卷包含23个封闭式问题,并发送给在圣保罗州生活和工作的医生。分析人口统计学数据、姑息性镇静的使用患病率和频率、参与者对该做法的熟悉程度及相关激励因素。为尽量减少记忆偏差,关于使用频率和激励因素的问题仅限于调查完成日期前的最后一年。采用描述性统计来汇总数据。

结果

共发送20168封电子邮件,获得324份有效回复,回复率为2%。在整个专业实践过程中,姑息性镇静的总体使用率为68%。然而,只有48%的受访者报告在过去一年中使用过姑息性镇静,主要目的是缓解疼痛(35%)。在研究期间,使用频率为1至6次(66%),不使用的主要原因是缺乏符合条件的患者(64%)。约83%的医生对使用姑息性镇静感到放心,但只有26%的医生报告在该领域接受过特定的学术培训。

结论

姑息性镇静的使用率很高,主要指征是缓解疼痛。然而,由于缺乏符合条件的患者,使用频率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d56/7480494/eb8206b7b945/2317-6385-eins-18-eAO5395-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验