Suppr超能文献

加拿大成年人的日常体力活动和职业分类中的久坐行为。

Daily physical activity and sedentary behaviour across occupational classifications in Canadian adults.

机构信息

Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, and the School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.

Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2020 Sep 16;31(9):13-26. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000900002-eng.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adults spend a large proportion of their day at work. Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) have been shown to vary considerably between occupations. The objective of this study is to describe occupational differences in accelerometer-measured and self-reported PA and SB for Canadian full-time workers.

DATA AND METHODS

Using combined data from three cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Health Measures Survey (N = 4,080), three activity groups (high, intermediate, low) were created based on a composite ranking of accelerometer-derived steps, proportion of time spent sedentary (SED%) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in bouts of ⋝10 minutes (MVPA). Differences between groups were assessed for accelerometer-derived and self-reported PA and SB, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

On average, Canadians employed in full-time work were sedentary for 68.9% of their day (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.3% to 69.6%), took 8,984 steps per day (95% CI: 8,719 to 9,249) and accumulated 79.5 minutes per week of MVPA (95% CI: 71.1 to 87.9). Among Canadians employed in full-time work, 18.5% met the Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines. The high-activity group took significantly more steps and had a lower SED%, but spent a higher proportion of time in light-intensity PA compared with the intermediate- and low-activity groups. No differences were observed for MVPA. The low-activity group reported more recreational and active travel-related PA and leisure reading, while those in the high-activity group reported more work and domestic PA and leisure screen time.

DISCUSSION

The majority of full-time working adults are not getting adequate MVPA and spend most of their day sedentary, regardless of occupation. Findings support workplace policies to improve MVPA levels among Canadian workers and to promote awareness for the potential benefit of occupation-specific messaging around PA and SB.

摘要

背景

成年人一天中的大部分时间都在工作。已经证明,体力活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)在不同职业之间有很大差异。本研究的目的是描述加拿大全职工作者的加速度计测量和自我报告的 PA 和 SB 的职业差异。

数据和方法

使用全国代表性的加拿大健康测量调查(Canadian Health Measures Survey,CHMS)三个周期的数据(N=4080),根据加速度计衍生的步数、久坐时间比例(SED%)和以 ⋝10 分钟为一段的中等到剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)的比例(MVPA)的综合排名,创建了三个活动组(高、中、低)。评估了组间加速度计衍生和自我报告的 PA 和 SB 以及社会人口统计学和临床特征的差异。

结果

平均而言,加拿大全职工作者每天有 68.9%的时间处于久坐状态(95%置信区间[CI]:68.3%至 69.6%),每天走 8984 步(95%CI:8719 至 9249),每周积累 79.5 分钟的 MVPA(95%CI:71.1 至 87.9)。在加拿大全职工作者中,有 18.5%的人符合加拿大体育活动指南。高活动组的步数明显更多,SED%更低,但与中低活动组相比,他们的轻强度 PA 时间比例更高。MVPA 没有差异。低活动组报告了更多的娱乐和积极的旅行相关 PA 和休闲阅读,而高活动组报告了更多的工作和家庭 PA 和休闲屏幕时间。

讨论

大多数全职工作的成年人没有获得足够的 MVPA,并且大部分时间都处于久坐状态,无论其职业如何。研究结果支持在加拿大工作场所实施政策,以提高工人的 MVPA 水平,并提高对特定职业的 PA 和 SB 信息的潜在益处的认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验