• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

闲暇时间体力活动与职业活动水平之间的关联,美国国家健康访谈调查-2020 年。

Association Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Occupation Activity Level, National Health Interview Survey-United States, 2020.

机构信息

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2024 Feb 29;21(4):375-383. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0306. Print 2024 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2023-0306
PMID:38423004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity for any purpose counts toward meeting Physical Activity Guidelines (PAG). However, national surveillance systems traditionally focus on leisure-time physical activity. There is an incomplete understanding of the association between meeting PAG in leisure time and occupation activity level among US workers.

METHODS

We used cross-sectional 2020 National Health Interview Survey data to examine US adults aged 18-64 years who worked the week before the survey (n = 14,814). We estimated the proportion meeting aerobic and muscle-strengthening PAG in leisure time by occupation activity level (low, intermediate, and high). Using logistic regression, we examined the association between meeting PAG in leisure time and occupation activity level, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and stratified by hours worked. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics of adults working ≥40 hours (the previous week) in high-activity occupations to those in low- or intermediate-activity occupations.

RESULTS

Adults working in high-activity occupations were less likely to meet PAG in leisure time (26.1% [24.3-28.1]) versus those in low-activity (30.6% [29.1-32.2], P < .01) or intermediate-activity (32.4% [30.8-34.2]) occupations. In stratified, adjusted models, adults working ≥40 hours in low- and intermediate-activity occupations were 13% and 20%, respectively, more likely to meet PAG in leisure time versus those in high-activity occupations. Among those working ≥40 hours, adults in high-activity occupations were more likely to be Hispanic or Latino, male, younger, and have a high school education or lower compared with those in less active occupations.

CONCLUSION

Traditional surveillance may underestimate meeting PAG among people working in high-activity occupations, potentially disproportionately affecting certain groups.

摘要

背景

任何目的的身体活动都有助于达到身体活动指南(PAG)的要求。然而,传统的国家监测系统通常侧重于休闲时间的身体活动。对于美国工人在休闲时间达到 PAG 与职业活动水平之间的关联,我们的理解并不完整。

方法

我们使用 2020 年全国健康访谈调查的横断面数据,调查了在调查前一周工作的 18-64 岁美国成年人(n=14814)。我们根据职业活动水平(低、中、高)估计了在休闲时间达到有氧和肌肉强化 PAG 的比例。使用逻辑回归,我们调整了社会人口统计学特征并按工作小时数进行分层后,检查了在休闲时间达到 PAG 与职业活动水平之间的关联。我们比较了每周工作≥40 小时(前一周)的高活动职业的成年人与低或中活动职业的成年人的社会人口统计学特征。

结果

从事高活动职业的成年人在休闲时间达到 PAG 的可能性较低(26.1%[24.3-28.1]),而从事低活动(30.6%[29.1-32.2],P<0.01)或中活动(32.4%[30.8-34.2])职业的成年人。在分层调整后的模型中,每周工作≥40 小时的低活动和中活动职业的成年人分别有 13%和 20%更有可能在休闲时间达到 PAG,而不是从事高活动职业的成年人。在每周工作≥40 小时的成年人中,与从事低活动职业的成年人相比,从事高活动职业的成年人更有可能是西班牙裔或拉丁裔、男性、年轻、且受教育程度较低。

结论

传统监测可能低估了从事高活动职业的人群达到 PAG 的比例,这可能会不成比例地影响某些群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/0890ec133b90/nihms-1976965-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/bae3acbc4405/nihms-1976965-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/658bad15d86c/nihms-1976965-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/0890ec133b90/nihms-1976965-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/bae3acbc4405/nihms-1976965-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/658bad15d86c/nihms-1976965-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/10965361/0890ec133b90/nihms-1976965-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Occupation Activity Level, National Health Interview Survey-United States, 2020.闲暇时间体力活动与职业活动水平之间的关联,美国国家健康访谈调查-2020 年。
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Feb 29;21(4):375-383. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0306. Print 2024 Apr 1.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Are There Sex Differences in the Association of Alcohol Consumption With the Risk of Soft Tissue Sarcoma? A Nationwide Population-based Study in Korea.饮酒与软组织肉瘤风险之间的关联存在性别差异吗?韩国一项基于全国人口的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003602.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
8
Physical Activity, Cardiovascular Status, Mortality, and Prediabetes in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Adults.体力活动、心血管状况、死亡率与 Hispanic 和非 Hispanic 成年人的糖尿病前期。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415094. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15094.
9
The effect of leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the health of workers with different occupational physical activity demands: a systematic review.不同职业体力活动需求的劳动者的闲暇体力活动和久坐行为对健康的影响:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01166-z.
10
Interventions in outside-school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4 to 12 years.校外儿童保育环境中促进 4 至 12 岁学童身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):CD013380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Barriers and Facilitators to Physical ActivityAmong Underrepresented Minorities: Preliminary Outcomes from a Mixed-Methods Study.比较代表性不足的少数族裔参与体育活动的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究的初步结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;22(2):234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020234.
2
Associations Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Mortality by Sociodemographic Factors.按社会人口学因素划分的休闲时间身体活动与死亡率之间的关联
J Phys Act Health. 2025 Jan 28;22(4):485-492. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0511. Print 2025 Apr 1.
3
Within-person associations between daily stress and physical activity during working and non-working hours.

本文引用的文献

1
State and Local Chronic Disease Programs Adapt and Pivot to Address Community Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examples From CDC Funded SPAN, REACH, and HOP Programs.州和地方慢性病项目在新冠疫情期间调整方向以满足社区需求:来自美国疾病控制与预防中心资助的SPAN、REACH和HOP项目的实例
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Nov;23(1_suppl):12S-20S. doi: 10.1177/15248399221116090.
2
Physical Activity Among Adults Aged 18 and Over: United States, 2020.成年人身体活动:2020 年美国
NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Aug(443):1-8.
3
QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Percentage* of Adults Aged ≥18 Years Who Met the 2018 Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Both Muscle-Strengthening and Aerobic Physical Activity, by Urbanization Level - National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2020.
工作日和非工作日期间每日压力与身体活动之间的个体内关联。
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Jan;76:102777. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102777. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
快速统计数据:按城市化水平划分的年龄调整后的≥18岁成年人中,达到2018年联邦肌肉强化和有氧体育活动身体活动指南的成年人百分比 - 美国国家健康访谈调查,2020年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jul 8;71(27):887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7127a6.
4
Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655 892 participants.工作中的体力活动可能对健康无益。一项系统评价和荟萃分析研究了 23 项研究共 655892 名参与者的职业体力活动与心血管疾病死亡率之间的关系。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):86-98. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3993. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
5
Trends in Aerobic Physical Activity Participation Across Multiple Domains Among US Adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007/2008 to 2017/2018.美国成年人在多个领域的有氧运动参与趋势,全国健康和营养调查 2007/2008 年至 2017/2018 年。
J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(S1):S64-S73. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0173.
6
How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies.职业体力活动如何影响健康?158 项观察性研究中 23 项健康结果的伞式综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1474-1481. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102587.
7
Combining Data From Assessments of Leisure, Occupational, Household, and Transportation Physical Activity Among US Adults, NHANES 2011-2016.将美国成年人休闲、职业、家庭和交通体力活动评估数据相结合,NHANES 2011-2016。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 1;17:E117. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200137.
8
Daily physical activity and sedentary behaviour across occupational classifications in Canadian adults.加拿大成年人的日常体力活动和职业分类中的久坐行为。
Health Rep. 2020 Sep 16;31(9):13-26. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000900002-eng.
9
Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Across Occupational Classifications.不同职业人群的久坐时间和身体活动情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Mar;34(3):247-256. doi: 10.1177/0890117119885518. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Daily Physical Activity by Occupational Classification in US Adults: NHANES 2005-2006.按职业分类划分的美国成年人日常身体活动情况:2005 - 2006年美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Dec 1;15(12):900-911. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0465.