Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):1035-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
In April 2013, the public health function was transferred from the NHS to local government, making local authorities (LAs) responsible for commissioning the NHS Health Check programme. The programme aims to reduce preventable mortality and morbidity in people aged 40-74. The national five-year ambition is to invite all eligible individuals and to achieve an uptake of 75%. This study evaluates the effects of LA expenditure on the programme's invitation rates (the proportion of the eligible population invited to a health check), coverage rates (the proportion of the eligible population who received a health check) and uptake rates (attendance by those who received a formal invitation letter) in the first three years of the reforms. We ran negative binomial panel models and controlled for a range of confounders. Over 2013/14-2015/16, the invitation rate, coverage rate and uptake rate averaged 57% 28% and 49% respectively. Higher per capita spend on the programme was associated with increases in both the invitation rate and coverage rate, but had no effect on the uptake rate. When we controlled for the LA invitation rate, the association between spend and coverage rate was smaller but remained statistically significant. This suggests that alternatives to formal invitation, such as opportunistic approaches in work places or sports centres, may be effective in influencing attendance.
2013 年 4 月,公共卫生职能从国民保健制度转至地方政府,由地方当局负责委托国民保健制度健康检查计划。该计划旨在降低 40-74 岁人群的可预防死亡率和发病率。该计划的全国 5 年目标是邀请所有符合条件的个人,并实现 75%的参与率。本研究评估了地方当局支出对该计划邀请率(邀请合格人口的比例)、覆盖率(接受健康检查的合格人口比例)和参与率(收到正式邀请信的人出席率)的影响,评估时间为改革后的前三年。我们运行了负二项式面板模型,并控制了一系列混杂因素。在 2013/14 至 2015/16 年期间,邀请率、覆盖率和参与率平均分别为 57%、28%和 49%。该计划的人均支出较高与邀请率和覆盖率的增加有关,但对参与率没有影响。当我们控制地方当局的邀请率时,支出与覆盖率之间的关联虽然较小,但仍具有统计学意义。这表明,在工作场所或体育中心等场所采取机会性方法等替代正式邀请的方法可能会有效地影响出勤率。