Suppr超能文献

非洲和中东的艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究:南北合作和关系中的参与和公平性。

HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships.

机构信息

Department of History of Science and Documentation, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Global Health. 2020 Sep 17;16(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00609-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV/AIDS has attracted considerable research attention since the 1980s. In the current context of globalization and the predominance of cooperative work, it is crucial to analyze the participation of the countries and regions where the infection is most prevalent. This study assesses the participation of African countries in publications on the topic, as well as the degree of equity or influence existing in North-South relations.

METHODS

We identified all articles and reviews of HIV/AIDS indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. We analyzed the scientific production, collaboration, and contributions from African and Middle Eastern countries to scientific activity in the region. The concept of leadership, measured through the participation as the first author of documents in collaboration was used to determine the equity in research produced through international collaboration.

RESULTS

A total of 68,808 documents published from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed. Researchers from North America and Europe participated in 82.14% of the global scientific production on HIV/AIDS, compared to just 21.61% from Africa and the Middle East. Furthermore, the publications that did come out of these regions was concentrated in a small number of countries, led by South Africa (41% of the documents). Other features associated with HIV/AIDS publications from Africa include the importance of international collaboration from the USA, the UK, and other European countries (75-93% of the documents) and the limited participation as first authors that is evident (30 to 36% of the documents). Finally, the publications to which African countries contributed had a notably different disciplinary orientation, with a predominance of research on public health, epidemiology, and drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to foster more balance in research output, avoid the concentration of resources that reproduces the global North-South model on the African continent, and focus the research agenda on local priorities. To accomplish this, the global North should strengthen the transfer of research skills and seek equity in cooperative ties, favoring the empowerment of African countries. These efforts should be concentrated in countries with low scientific activity and high incidence and prevalence of the disease. It is also essential to foster intraregional collaborations between African countries.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,艾滋病毒/艾滋病引起了相当多的研究关注。在当前全球化和合作工作为主导的背景下,分析感染最流行的国家和地区的参与情况至关重要。本研究评估了非洲国家在该主题出版物中的参与情况,以及南北关系中存在的公平或影响力程度。

方法

我们确定了 Web of Science 核心合集索引的所有关于艾滋病毒/艾滋病的文章和综述。我们分析了科学成果、合作以及非洲和中东国家对该地区科学活动的贡献。通过作为合作文件第一作者的参与来衡量领导力的概念,用于确定通过国际合作产生的研究的公平性。

结果

分析了 2010 年至 2017 年期间发表的共计 68808 篇文献。来自北美和欧洲的研究人员参与了全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病科学研究的 82.14%,而来自非洲和中东的研究人员仅占 21.61%。此外,这些地区发表的出版物集中在少数几个国家,其中南非(占文献的 41%)为首。与非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病出版物相关的其他特征包括来自美国、英国和其他欧洲国家的国际合作的重要性(占文献的 75-93%)以及作为第一作者的参与度有限(占文献的 30-36%)。最后,非洲国家做出贡献的出版物具有明显不同的学科方向,主要是公共卫生、流行病学和药物治疗方面的研究。

结论

有必要促进研究产出更加平衡,避免在非洲大陆上再现全球南北模式的资源集中,并将研究议程重点放在当地的优先事项上。为此,全球北方应加强研究技能的转让,并寻求合作关系中的公平,支持非洲国家的赋权。这些努力应集中在科学活动水平低、疾病发病率和患病率高的国家。促进非洲国家之间的区域内合作也至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/415a/7499968/a8d30305ea97/12992_2020_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验