Suppr超能文献

南南合作在艾滋病预防和治疗研究中的应用:物以类聚,人以群分。

South-south collaboration on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment research: when birds of a feather rarely flock together.

机构信息

Center for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Av Brasil 4036, 8th floor, room 814, Rio de Janeiro, 21040-361, Brazil.

Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Global Health. 2018 Mar 1;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0341-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

South-south collaboration on health and development research is a critical mechanism for social and economic progress. It allows sharing and replicating experiences to find a "southern solution" to meet shared health challenges, such as access to adequate HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. This study aimed to generate evidence on the dynamics of south-south collaboration in HIV/AIDS research, which could ultimately inform stakeholders on the progress and nature of collaboration towards increased research capacities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

Bibliometric and social network analysis methods were used to assess the 10-year (2006-2015) scientific contribution of LMIC, through the analysis of scientific publications on HIV/AIDS prevention and/or treatment. Five dimensions oriented the study: knowledge production, co-authorship analysis, research themes mapping, research types classification and funding sources.

RESULTS

Publications involving LMIC have substantially increased overtime, despite small expression of south-south collaboration. Research themes mapping revealed that publication focus varied according to collaborating countries' income categories, from diagnosis, opportunistic infections and laboratory-based research (LMIC single or LMIC-LMIC) to human behavior and healthcare, drug therapy and mother to child transmission (LMIC-HIC). The analysis of research types showed that south-south collaborations frequently targeted social sciences issues. Funding agencies acknowledged in south-south collaboration also showed diverse focus: LMIC-based funders tended to support basic biomedical research whereas international/HIC-based funders seem to cover predominantly social sciences-oriented research.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the global environment has fostered an increasing participation of LMIC in collaborative learning models, south-south collaboration on HIV/AIDS prevention and/or treatment research seemed to be lower than expected, stressing the need for strategies to foster these partnerships. The evidence presented in this study can be used to strengthen a knowledge platform to inform future policy, planning and funding decisions, contributing to the development of enhanced collaboration and a priority research agenda for LMICs.

摘要

背景

南南合作在卫生和发展研究方面是社会和经济进步的关键机制。它允许共享和复制经验,以找到“南方解决方案”来应对共同的卫生挑战,例如获得足够的艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防和治疗。本研究旨在就艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究中的南南合作动态生成证据,这最终可以为利益攸关方提供有关合作进展和性质的信息,以增加中低收入国家(LMIC)的研究能力。

方法

使用文献计量学和社会网络分析方法,通过分析艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防和/或治疗方面的科学出版物,评估 10 年来(2006-2015 年) LMIC 的科学贡献。五个方面指导了这项研究:知识生产、合著分析、研究主题映射、研究类型分类和资金来源。

结果

尽管南南合作的表达很小,但涉及 LMIC 的出版物数量已大大增加。研究主题映射显示,出版重点根据合作国家的收入类别而有所不同,从诊断、机会性感染和基于实验室的研究(单一 LMIC 或 LMIC-LMIC)到人类行为和医疗保健、药物治疗和母婴传播(LMIC-HIC)。研究类型分析表明,南南合作经常针对社会科学问题。在南南合作中得到认可的资助机构也表现出不同的重点:基于 LMIC 的资助者倾向于支持基础生物医学研究,而基于国际/高收入国家的资助者似乎主要涵盖面向社会科学的研究。

结论

尽管全球环境促进了 LMIC 越来越多地参与合作学习模式,但艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防和/或治疗研究方面的南南合作似乎低于预期,这强调了需要制定战略来促进这些伙伴关系。本研究提出的证据可用于加强知识平台,为未来的政策、规划和资金决策提供信息,为加强合作和为 LMIC 制定优先研究议程做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39d4/5831226/b90ad006be34/12992_2018_341_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验