Johnston Esther M, Szkwarko Daria, Evensen Ann E, Klee David, Valdman Olga, Cayley William E, El Rayess Fadya
National Family Medicine Residency at HealthPoint, Auburn, WA.
University of Massachusetts, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, and Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University.
PRiMER. 2017 Aug 31;1:11. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2017.524903. eCollection 2017 Sep.
The proliferation of new family medicine training programs across the globe has increased the demand for faculty development (FD) opportunities in international settings. US-based faculty may partner with international colleagues to support FD. In 2016, the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Global Health Educators Collaborative (STFM-GHEC) began to develop a toolkit of low-cost FD resources for this purpose. To ensure that the resources appropriately target current FD needs, STFM-GHEC organized a session at the 2016 American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Global Health Workshop (GHW) to collect feedback from internationally-based and US-based faculty.
The authors presented a list of faculty development topics to attendees of an AAFP GHW session entitled "Global Faculty Development Tool Kit" on September 8, 2016, in Atlanta, Georgia. Workshop participants voted up to five times each using sticky notes for the topics they felt were of greatest need.
Forty-five participants cast 157 votes (34 from internationally-based faculty, 123 from US-based faculty). The combined group ranked curriculum development, program evaluation, and teaching methods as the most important FD needs. Both groups identified assessment strategy and time management among the least important FD needs. Other topics such as technology training and research design varied widely between the two groups in relative importance.
This pilot demonstrates that US-based and internationally-based family medicine faculty may differ in their perceived FD needs. This exercise may be utilized by future members in global health partnerships to understand and prioritize faculty development needs.
全球新的家庭医学培训项目不断增加,这使得国际环境下对教师发展(FD)机会的需求也日益增长。美国的教师可能会与国际同行合作以支持教师发展。2016年,家庭医学教师协会全球健康教育者协作组织(STFM-GHEC)开始为此目的开发一套低成本的教师发展资源工具包。为确保这些资源能恰当地满足当前的教师发展需求,STFM-GHEC在2016年美国家庭医师学会(AAFP)全球健康研讨会(GHW)上组织了一次会议,以收集国际和美国教师的反馈。
作者在2016年9月8日于佐治亚州亚特兰大举行的AAFP GHW会议的“全球教师发展工具包”环节,向与会者展示了一份教师发展主题清单。研讨会参与者用便利贴为他们认为最需要的主题投票,每人最多投五次。
45名参与者共投出157票(国际教师投了34票,美国教师投了123票)。两组共同将课程开发、项目评估和教学方法列为最重要的教师发展需求。两组都认为评估策略和时间管理是最不重要的教师发展需求。其他主题,如技术培训和研究设计,两组的相对重要性差异很大。
这项试点表明,美国和国际家庭医学教师在他们所认为的教师发展需求方面可能存在差异。全球健康伙伴关系的未来成员可以利用这个活动来了解教师发展需求并确定其优先顺序。