• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于人道主义干预期间心理健康总体状况的患者自评量表。

Development of a patient rated scale for mental health global state for use during humanitarian interventions.

机构信息

Epicentre, Paris, France.

Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;30(1):e1850. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1850. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1850
PMID:32945587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7992285/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We present the results of a cross-cultural validation of the Mental Health Global State (MHGS) scale for adults and adolescents (<14 years old).

METHODS

We performed two independent studies using mixed methods among 103 patients in Hebron, Occupied Palestinian Territories and 106 in Cauca, Colombia. The MHGS was analyzed psychometrically, sensitivity and specificity, ability to detect clinically meaningful change, compared to the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S). Principal component analysis was used to reduce the number of questions after data collection.

RESULTS

The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha score of 0.80 in both settings. Test retest reliability was high, ICC 0.70 (95% CI [0.41-0.85]) in Hebron and 0.87 (95% CI [0.76-0.93]) in Cauca; inter-rater reliability was 0.70 (95% CI [0.42-0.85]) in Hebron and 0.76 (95% CI [0.57-0.88]) in Cauca. Psychometric properties were also good, and the tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 85% in Hebron and 100% in Cauca, with corresponding specificity of 80% and 79%, when compared to CGI-S.

CONCLUSIONS

The MHGS showed promising results to assess global mental health thereby providing an additional easy to use tool in humanitarian interventions. Additional work should focus on validation in at least one more context, to adhere to best practices in transcultural validation.

摘要

目的

我们呈现了心理健康全球状态(MHGS)量表在成人和青少年(<14 岁)中的跨文化验证结果。

方法

我们在巴勒斯坦被占领土的希伯伦和哥伦比亚考卡进行了两项独立的混合方法研究,共有 103 名患者和 106 名患者参与。对 MHGS 进行了心理计量学分析、敏感性和特异性、与临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)相比检测临床有意义变化的能力。在数据收集后,使用主成分分析来减少问题的数量。

结果

该量表在两个环境中均表现出良好的内部一致性,克朗巴赫 α 得分为 0.80。测试重测信度较高,在希伯伦的 ICC 为 0.70(95%CI [0.41-0.85]),在考卡的 ICC 为 0.87(95%CI [0.76-0.93]);组内信度在希伯伦为 0.70(95%CI [0.42-0.85]),在考卡为 0.76(95%CI [0.57-0.88])。心理计量学特性也较好,与 CGI-S 相比,该工具在希伯伦的敏感性为 85%,在考卡的敏感性为 100%,相应的特异性分别为 80%和 79%。

结论

MHGS 显示出评估全球心理健康的有前途的结果,从而为人道主义干预提供了另一种易于使用的工具。进一步的工作应集中在至少另一个环境中的验证上,以遵循跨文化验证的最佳实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/024758a3ae91/MPR-30-e1850-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/7f03486c3ed1/MPR-30-e1850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/a1b773c9c4c6/MPR-30-e1850-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/024758a3ae91/MPR-30-e1850-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/7f03486c3ed1/MPR-30-e1850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/a1b773c9c4c6/MPR-30-e1850-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22c/7992285/024758a3ae91/MPR-30-e1850-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a patient rated scale for mental health global state for use during humanitarian interventions.开发一种用于人道主义干预期间心理健康总体状况的患者自评量表。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;30(1):e1850. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1850. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
2
Association between severity of symptoms and minimum mental health treatment duration in humanitarian contexts: a retrospective observational study.人道主义背景下症状严重程度与最低心理健康治疗持续时间之间的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 3;67:102362. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102362. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
A rapid screening tool for psychological distress in children 3-6years old: results of a validation study.3-6 岁儿童心理困扰的快速筛查工具:验证研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 16;12:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-170.
4
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
5
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
6
Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT): Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability, Validity, and Mapping to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment.自杀意念和行为评估工具(SIBAT):评估内部和外部评分者可靠性、有效性,并映射到自杀评估的哥伦比亚分类算法。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113495. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113495. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
[Factor analysis and validation of a Spanish version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in Colombia].[哥伦比亚版简明精神状态评定量表西班牙语版本的因素分析与验证]
Biomedica. 2005 Mar;25(1):120-8.
8
PACES: a primary care tool to detect mental health disorders in Indigenous Colombians.PACES:一种用于检测哥伦比亚土著人群心理健康障碍的初级保健工具。
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Aug;23(3):7851. doi: 10.22605/RRH7851. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
Screening for psychological difficulties in young children in crisis: complementary cross-cultural validation.危机中幼儿心理问题筛查:跨文化补充验证
Int Health. 2015 Nov;7(6):438-46. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv006. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Association between severity of symptoms and minimum mental health treatment duration in humanitarian contexts: a retrospective observational study.人道主义背景下症状严重程度与最低心理健康治疗持续时间之间的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 3;67:102362. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102362. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Severity, symptomatology, and treatment duration for mental health disorders: a retrospective analysis from a conflict-affected region of northern Nigeria.心理健康障碍的严重程度、症状学及治疗持续时间:来自尼日利亚北部受冲突影响地区的一项回顾性分析
Confl Health. 2022 Jul 15;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00473-x.

本文引用的文献

1
New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.世界卫生组织关于冲突环境中心理障碍患病率的最新估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):240-248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
[Prevalence and Associated Factors of Mental Disorders in Colombian Child Population, the 2015 National Mental Health Survey].[2015年哥伦比亚全国心理健康调查:哥伦比亚儿童人群精神障碍的患病率及相关因素]
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2016 Dec;45 Suppl 1:39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
3
Managing Ethical Challenges to Mental Health Research in Post-Conflict Settings.
应对冲突后环境中精神卫生研究的伦理挑战
Dev World Bioeth. 2016 Apr;16(1):15-28. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12076. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
4
Cultural aspects of major mental disorders: a critical review from an Indian perspective.主要精神障碍的文化层面:基于印度视角的批判性综述
Indian J Psychol Med. 2012 Oct;34(4):306-12. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.108193.
5
Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): use of idiographic and standardized measures.儿童和青少年心理健康服务中的患者报告结局:使用个体化和标准化测量工具。
J Ment Health. 2012 Apr;21(2):165-73. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.664304.
6
Mental health and psychosocial support in humanitarian settings: linking practice and research.人道主义环境中的心理健康和心理社会支持:将实践与研究联系起来。
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1581-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61094-5. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
7
Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in low-income and middle-income countries: risk and protective factors.在低收入和中等收入国家重新安置的流离失所和难民儿童的心理健康:风险和保护因素。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 21;379(9812):250-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60050-0. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
8
Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in high-income countries: risk and protective factors.高收入国家中流离失所和难民儿童的心理健康:风险和保护因素。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 21;379(9812):266-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60051-2. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
Improving access to psychological treatments: lessons from developing countries.改善心理治疗的可及性:来自发展中国家的经验教训。
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Sep;49(9):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
The Clinical Global Impression Scale and the influence of patient or staff perspective on outcome.临床总体印象量表及其对患者或医护人员视角对结果的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 May 14;11:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-83.