• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期匹配比较原发性和翻修腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。

Long-Term Matched Comparison of Primary and Revisional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

机构信息

Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine Safed, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):695-705. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06436-8. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06436-8
PMID:36595147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9809525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports of long-term (> 5-15-year) outcomes assessing the safety and efficacy of primary revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are few.

METHODS

Retrospective long-term comparisons of primary (pLSG) and revisional (rLSG) procedures were matched for gender, age ± 5 years, and body mass index (BMI) ± 5 kg/m. Weight loss, associated medical condition status, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between May 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, 194 matched patients with severe obesity (mean BMI 44.1 ± 6.7 kg/m; age 44.2 ± 10.0 years, 67.0% female) underwent pLSG (n = 97) or rLSG (n = 97) and were followed for a mean 12.1 ± 1.5 vs 7.6 ± 2.1 years. Respective mean weight regain from nadir was 15.0 ± 14.4 kg vs 11.9 ± 12.2 kg. Respective percent mean total weight loss and excess weight loss were 20.9 ± 12.7% and 51.8 ± 33.1%, and 18.3 ± 12.8% and 43.4 ± 31.6% at last follow-up, with no significant difference between groups. Resolution of type 2 diabetes (HbA1 < 6.5%, off medications) was 23.1% vs 11.1%; hypertension 36.0% vs 16.0%; and hyperlipidemia 37.1% vs 35.3%. Patients in the pLSG group were significantly more satisfied with LSG (59.8% vs 43.3%, p < 0.05) and more likely to choose the procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in long-term weight loss or associated medical condition outcomes in matched pLSG and rLSG patients.

摘要

背景

关于初次修正腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的长期(>5-15 年)安全性和疗效的报告很少。

方法

对初次(pLSG)和修正(rLSG)手术进行回顾性长期比较,并按性别、年龄(±5 岁)和体重指数(BMI)(±5kg/m)进行匹配。评估体重减轻、相关疾病状况和患者满意度。

结果

2006 年 5 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日,194 例严重肥胖患者(平均 BMI 44.1±6.7kg/m;年龄 44.2±10.0 岁,67.0%为女性)接受了 pLSG(n=97)或 rLSG(n=97)治疗,并随访了平均 12.1±1.5 年和 7.6±2.1 年。各自的体重从最低点的恢复分别为 15.0±14.4kg 和 11.9±12.2kg。各自的平均体重减轻百分比和多余体重减轻百分比分别为 20.9±12.7%和 51.8±33.1%,18.3±12.8%和 43.4±31.6%,两组之间无显著差异。2 型糖尿病(HbA1<6.5%,停药)缓解率为 23.1%和 11.1%;高血压缓解率为 36.0%和 16.0%;高血脂缓解率为 37.1%和 35.3%。pLSG 组的患者对 LSG 明显更满意(59.8%和 43.3%,p<0.05),且更可能再次选择该手术。

结论

在初次 pLSG 和 rLSG 患者中,长期体重减轻或相关疾病状况结果无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/cd6362d4f255/11695_2022_6436_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/7ccd078bd4f9/11695_2022_6436_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/103c50dcbc67/11695_2022_6436_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/cd6362d4f255/11695_2022_6436_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/7ccd078bd4f9/11695_2022_6436_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/103c50dcbc67/11695_2022_6436_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a62/9809525/cd6362d4f255/11695_2022_6436_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Matched Comparison of Primary and Revisional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.长期匹配比较原发性和翻修腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。
Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):695-705. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06436-8. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Revisional Procedure Following Adjustable Gastric Banding: Variations in Outcomes Based on Indication.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为可调胃束带后修正术的长期疗效:基于适应证的疗效差异。
Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):3722-3739. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06886-8. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Medium Term Outcomes of Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy after Gastric Banding: A Propensity Score Matched Study.胃束带后腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的中期结果:倾向评分匹配研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2005-2015. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06629-9. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Short-Term Results of Revisional Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Regain.袖状胃切除术后再次行单吻合口胃旁路术治疗体重反弹的短期疗效。
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2197-2202. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3158-3.
5
Revised sleeve gastrectomy: another option for weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术修正术:袖状胃切除术后减重失败的另一种选择。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1096-102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3277-9. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric banding: is it really effective? Six years of follow-up.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗胃旁路术后失败:真的有效吗?六年随访。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Jul;13(7):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asia: Long term outcome and revisional surgery.亚洲的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:长期疗效与翻修手术
Asian J Surg. 2016 Jan;39(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 8.
8
Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后治疗病态肥胖的翻修方法的安全性和短期结果。
Obes Surg. 2009 Dec;19(12):1612-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9941-4.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Single-Center, Retrospective Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的长期结局——一项单中心回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):130-134. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2795-2.
10
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional surgery for adjustable gastric band erosion.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带侵蚀的修正手术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Sep;24(9):593-600. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0584. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Predictive Factors for the Efficacy of Modified Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.改良三孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗2型糖尿病疗效的预测因素分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Sep 9;18:3375-3385. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S525774. eCollection 2025.
2
Endoscopic Outcomes Before and Five Years After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is There a Significant Impact?腹腔镜袖状胃切除术前及术后五年的内镜检查结果:是否有显著影响?
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70009. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Special Risk Group for Lifestyle, Emotional and Behavioral Adaptations During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Lessons from the First Wave.接受减重手术的患者:在 COVID-19 封锁期间生活方式、情绪和行为适应的特殊风险群体。第一波疫情的教训。
Obes Surg. 2022 Feb;32(2):441-449. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05792-1. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Long-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after failed gastric band: a multicenter cross-matched cohort study.袖状胃切除术作为胃旁路术失败后的翻修术的长期疗效:一项多中心交叉匹配队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01182-5. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
3
袖状胃切除术和胃旁路术作为抗糖尿病报销翻修手术的成本效益:一项全国性队列研究。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Apr 11;5(2):e420. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000420. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Adherence to Dietary Behavior Recommendations Moderates the Effect Between Time Since Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and Percentage Total Weight Loss.饮食行为建议的遵守程度可调节代谢和减重手术后时间与体重总减轻百分比之间的关系。
Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):2930-2939. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07359-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on thyroid hormones and relationship between metabolic parameters and long-term total weight loss.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对甲状腺激素的影响及代谢参数与长期总减重的关系。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1807-1812. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10693-2. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
6
Medium Term Outcomes of Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy after Gastric Banding: A Propensity Score Matched Study.胃束带后腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的中期结果:倾向评分匹配研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2005-2015. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06629-9. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Comparison of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy for Revision of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: 5-Year Outcomes.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败的比较:5 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1782-1789. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06588-1. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Long-term Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: What Are the Results Beyond 10 Years?
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的长期效果:10 年以上的结果如何?
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3427-3433. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05437-3. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Metabolic effects of bariatric surgery on patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based study.减重手术对 2 型糖尿病患者代谢的影响:基于人群的研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1349-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Following Failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-a Comparison Between One- and two-Stage Procedures, an Israeli National Database Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败:一项以色列国家数据库研究的单、双阶段手术比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2364-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05312-1. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-a Comparative Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的长期生活质量结局比较研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):1376-1380. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05049-3. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
7
Safety of Single Stage Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass after Failed Gastric Banding.单阶段腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃束带失败后的安全性比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):588-596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04975-6. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于减重手术的临床实践指南:2020 年更新版,获得国际肥胖与代谢外科学会联合会(IFSO-EC)、欧洲肥胖与代谢外科学会(EASO)和欧洲减重外科学会(ESPCOP)认可。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2332-2358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07555-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Long-term outcomes and frequency of reoperative bariatric surgery beyond 15 years after gastric banding: a high band failure rate with safe revisions.胃带术后 15 年以上的长期结果和再次手术的频率:高带失败率,安全修复。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jun;15(6):900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
10
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure.美国代谢与减重外科学会关于袖状胃切除术作为一种减重手术的最新立场声明。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Oct;13(10):1652-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 22.