• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型跨上皮种植体基台共振频率分析值的可靠性:一项前瞻性临床研究。

Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study.

机构信息

Periodontics, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Velódromo S/N, 22006 Huesca, Spain.

Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 16;17(18):6733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186733.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186733
PMID:32947802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7559410/
Abstract

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) requires abutment disconnection to monitor implant stability. To overcome this limitation, an experimental transepithelial abutment was designed to allow a SmartPeg to be screwed onto it, in order to determine the prototype abutments repeatability and reproducibility using Osstell ISQ and to assess whether implant length and diameter have an influence on the reliability of these measurements. RFA was conducted with a SmartPeg screwed directly into the implant and onto experimental abutments of different heights of 2, 3.5 and 5 mm. A total of 32 patients (116 implants) were tested. RFA measurements were taken twice for each group from mesial, distal, buccal and palatal/lingual surfaces. Mean values and SD were calculated and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) ( < 0.05, IC 95%). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) mean values were 72.581 measured directly to implant and 72.899 (2 mm), 72.391 (3.5 mm) and 71.458 (5 mm) measured from the prototypes. ICC between measurements made directly to implant and through 2-, 3.5- and 5-mm abutments were 0.908, 0.919 and 0.939, respectively. RFA values registered through the experimental transepithelial abutments achieved a high reliability. Neither the implant length nor the diameter had any influence on the measurements' reliability.

摘要

共振频率分析(RFA)需要将基台断开以监测种植体稳定性。为了克服这一限制,设计了一种实验性的上皮下基台,允许将 SmartPeg 拧入其中,以便使用 Osstell ISQ 来确定原型基台的重复性和再现性,并评估种植体长度和直径是否会影响这些测量的可靠性。RFA 是将 SmartPeg 直接拧入种植体并拧到高度分别为 2、3.5 和 5mm 的实验基台上进行的。共测试了 32 名患者(116 个种植体)。每个组的近中、远中、颊侧和腭/舌侧表面均进行了两次 RFA 测量。计算平均值和标准差,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)(<0.05,IC95%)。直接测量种植体的种植体稳定性值(ISQ)平均值为 72.581,通过 2mm、3.5mm 和 5mm 基台测量的 ISQ 平均值分别为 72.899、72.391 和 71.458。直接测量种植体与通过 2mm、3.5mm 和 5mm 基台测量的 ICC 分别为 0.908、0.919 和 0.939。通过实验性上皮下基台记录的 RFA 值具有很高的可靠性。种植体长度和直径均不影响测量的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/58921c2ef052/ijerph-17-06733-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/80d8eed224c4/ijerph-17-06733-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/c673cb965ca0/ijerph-17-06733-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/afe4c7bd3c06/ijerph-17-06733-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/f6cf9fcc6628/ijerph-17-06733-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/58921c2ef052/ijerph-17-06733-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/80d8eed224c4/ijerph-17-06733-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/c673cb965ca0/ijerph-17-06733-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/afe4c7bd3c06/ijerph-17-06733-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/f6cf9fcc6628/ijerph-17-06733-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/7559410/58921c2ef052/ijerph-17-06733-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study.新型跨上皮种植体基台共振频率分析值的可靠性:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 16;17(18):6733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186733.
2
Is It Possible to Monitor Implant Stability on a Prosthetic Abutment? An In Vitro Resonance Frequency Analysis.是否可以监测义齿基台上的种植体稳定性?体外共振频率分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114073.
3
Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Comparison of Reliability of 3 Resonance Frequency Analysis Devices: An In Vitro Study.三种共振频率分析设备可靠性的比较:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Feb 1;48(1):9-14. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139.
5
In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis.体外比较分析两种共振频率测量设备:Osstell 种植体稳定性测量仪和 Penguin 共振频率分析仪。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/cid.12868. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.共振频率分析:两种临床仪器比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):308-312. doi: 10.1111/cid.12598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
Initial Stability Measurements of Implants Using a New Magnetic Resonance Frequency Analyzer With Titanium Transducers: An Ex Vivo Study.使用带有钛换能器的新型磁共振频率分析仪对植入物进行初始稳定性测量:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Feb 1;46(1):35-40. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00126.
8
Resonance frequency analysis of osseo-integrated implants for bone conduction in a pediatric population - a novel approach for assessing stability for early loading.小儿人群中用于骨传导的骨整合种植体的共振频率分析——一种评估早期负载稳定性的新方法。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;78(4):641-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
9
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
10
Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.拔牙时同期植入种植体的稳定性测量:一项队列前瞻性临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2005 Mar;76(3):391-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Healing Abutment Height on Secondary Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Prospective Clinical Study.使用共振频率分析评估愈合基台高度对种植体二期稳定性的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 19;14(14):5140. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145140.
2
Influence of anaerobic adhesive on the resonance frequency analysis measured in abutments with external hexagon and conical connections: an in vitro study.种植体的外六边和锥形连接体的共振频率分析受厌氧胶影响的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 29;28(12):667. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06057-8.
3
Influence of torque and bone type on stability quotient of two implant platforms: a clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the Simultaneous Use of Biomaterials in Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Humans.评价生物材料在牙槽嵴窦内提升术中的联合应用:一项针对人类的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):1888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061888.
2
Influence of abutment disconnection on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial.基台连接断开对种植体边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Apr;31(4):341-351. doi: 10.1111/clr.13572. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)?
扭矩和骨类型对两种种植体平台稳定性系数的影响:一项临床试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Jun 24;38:e049. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049. eCollection 2024.
4
Does the index in Morse taper connection affect the abutment stability? An in vitro experimental study.莫氏锥度连接中的锥度指数会影响基台稳定性吗?一项体外实验研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0298462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298462. eCollection 2024.
5
Thermal necrosis-aided dental implant removal: A rabbit model pilot study.热坏死辅助拔牙:兔模型初步研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Mar 1;28(2):e148-e155. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25616.
在共振频率分析(RFA)期间,智能桩的手动插入扭矩是否会影响种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的结果?
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Dec 12;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1.
4
Use of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate the effects of surface properties on the stability of different implants.使用共振频率分析评估表面特性对不同种植体稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):239-245. doi: 10.1111/clr.13560. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
In vitro comparison of resonance frequency analysis devices to evaluate implant stability of narrow diameter implants at varying drilling speeds in dense artificial bone blocks.在不同钻速下,评估密质人工骨块中窄直径种植体稳定性的共振频率分析装置的体外比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):1023-1027. doi: 10.1111/cid.12842. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes on Patients Rehabilitated with Complete-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses According to the Time of Loading.基于加载时间的全弓固定式种植体支持修复的患者临床结局的系统评价
J Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;28(9):958-968. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13104. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of the implant stability quotient in monitoring progressive peri-implant bone loss: An experimental study in dogs.种植体稳定性指数监测种植体周围骨渐进性丧失的诊断准确性:一项犬的实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1016-1024. doi: 10.1111/clr.13368. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
The influence of repeated abutment changes on peri-implant tissue stability: 3-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台反复更换对种植体周围组织稳定性的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的3年加载后结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(4):373-390.
10
Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review.种植体稳定性测量的插入扭矩和共振频率分析之间的关系:系统评价。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Feb;20(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.12565. Epub 2017 Dec 1.