Suppr超能文献

韩国南洞江地区全氟辛酸和全氟辛烷磺酸的环境和饮食暴露情况。

Environmental and dietary exposure of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid in the Nakdong River, Korea.

机构信息

Chemical Safety Division, National Institute of Agriculture Science, RDA, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science (IALS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Jan;43(1):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00721-0. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Abstract

This study performed the first environmental and dietary exposure assessment to explore plant uptake of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) from agricultural soil and irrigation water in the Nakdong River delta, South Korea. Annual average concentrations of total PFOA and PFOS ranged from 0.026 to 0.112 µg L (irrigation water), and from 0.818 to 1.364 µg kg (soil), respectively. PFOA and PFOS hotspots were identified downstream of the Nakdong River and were influenced by seasonal climatic variations. The observed average biennial concentration of the sum of PFOA and PFOS decreased in irrigation water, from 0.112 µg L in 2013 to 0.026 µg L in 2015, suggests that the 2013 Persistent Organic Pollutants Control Act may have helped to reduce levels of PFAS at this location. This study calculated some of the highest plant uptake factors reported to date, with values ranging from 0.962 in green onions to < 0.004 in plums. Leafy vegetables and rice are important components of the Korean diet; these groups had the largest contribution to the estimated dietary intake of PFOA and PFOS, which was calculated at 0.449 and 0.140 ng kg day, respectively. This corresponded to 66.4% for PFOA and 7.9% for PFOS of the EFSA reference dose (RfD). The dietary intake of PFOA and PFOS from crops alone did not exceed the RfD. However, when the estimated daily intake (EDI) from other sources such as tap water, meat, fish, dairy, and beverages was included in the exposure risk assessment, both of the EDIs to PFOA and PFOS exceeded the RfDs, indicating that there may be a risk to human health. This study concludes that consumption of crops might, therefore, be a significant and underappreciated pathway for human exposure to PFAS.

摘要

本研究首次进行了环境和饮食暴露评估,以探索农业土壤和灌溉水中全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)在韩国洛东江三角洲的植物吸收情况。灌溉水中总 PFOA 和 PFOS 的年平均浓度范围分别为 0.026 至 0.112 µg/L,土壤中分别为 0.818 至 1.364 µg/kg。PFOA 和 PFOS 的热点出现在洛东江下游,受季节性气候变化影响。观测到的灌溉水中 PFOA 和 PFOS 总和的两年平均浓度从 2013 年的 0.112 µg/L 下降到 2015 年的 0.026 µg/L,这表明 2013 年《持久性有机污染物控制法》可能有助于降低该地点的 PFAS 水平。本研究计算了迄今为止报告的一些最高的植物吸收因子,范围从青葱的 0.962 到李子的<0.004。叶菜类蔬菜和大米是韩国饮食的重要组成部分;这些群体对 PFOA 和 PFOS 的估计膳食摄入量的贡献最大,分别为 0.449 和 0.140 ng/kg·天。这相当于 EFSA 参考剂量(RfD)的 PFOA 为 66.4%,PFOS 为 7.9%。仅从农作物摄入的 PFOA 和 PFOS 没有超过 RfD。然而,当将自来水中、肉类、鱼类、奶制品和饮料等其他来源的估计每日摄入量(EDI)纳入暴露风险评估时,PFOA 和 PFOS 的 EDI 均超过了 RfD,表明可能对人类健康构成风险。本研究得出结论,食用农作物可能是人类接触 PFAS 的一个重要且未被充分认识的途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验