• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两个图片描述任务的主要概念:补充内容。

Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.

作者信息

Richardson Jessica D, Dalton Sarah Grace Hudspeth

机构信息

University of New Mexico, MSC 01 1195, Albuquerque, NM 87131, (505) 277-1765.

University of New Mexico, MSC 01 1195, Albuquerque, NM 87131, (470) 281-0470.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2020;34(1):119-136. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417
PMID:32952259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7500506/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proposition analysis of the discourse of persons with aphasia has a long history, yielding important advancements in our understanding of communication impairments in this population. Recently, discourse measures have been considered primary outcome measures, and multiple calls have been made for improved psychometric properties of discourse measures.

AIMS

To advance the use of discourse analysis in persons with aphasia by providing Main Concept Analysis checklists and descriptive statistics for healthy control performance on the analysis for the Cat in the Tree and Refused Umbrella narrative tasks utilized in the AphasiaBank database protocol.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Ninety-two control transcripts, stratified into four age groups (20-39 years; 40-59; 60-79; 80+), were downloaded from the AphasiaBank database. Relevant concepts were identified, and those spoken by at least one-third of the control sample were considered to be a main concept. A multi-level coding system was used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the main concepts produced by control speakers.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Main concept checklists for two discourse tasks are provided. Descriptive statistics are reported and examined to assist readers with evaluation of the normative data.

CONCLUSIONS

These checklists provide clinicians and researchers with a tool to reliably assess the discourse of persons with aphasia. They also help address the gap in available psychometric data with which to compare persons with aphasia to healthy controls.

摘要

背景

失语症患者话语的命题分析有着悠久的历史,在我们对这一人群沟通障碍的理解方面取得了重要进展。最近,话语测量已被视为主要结局测量指标,并且多次呼吁改善话语测量的心理测量特性。

目的

通过提供主要概念分析清单以及失语症数据库协议中所使用的“树上的猫”和“拒绝雨伞”叙述任务分析中健康对照表现的描述性统计数据,推进失语症患者话语分析的应用。

方法与步骤

从失语症数据库下载了92份对照转录本,分为四个年龄组(20 - 39岁;40 - 59岁;60 - 79岁;80岁及以上)。确定了相关概念,至少三分之一的对照样本说出的概念被视为主要概念。使用多层次编码系统来确定对照说话者产生的主要概念的准确性和完整性。

结果与结论

提供了两个话语任务的主要概念清单。报告并检查了描述性统计数据,以帮助读者评估规范数据。

结论

这些清单为临床医生和研究人员提供了一种可靠评估失语症患者话语的工具。它们还有助于弥补现有心理测量数据方面的差距,以便将失语症患者与健康对照进行比较。

相似文献

1
Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.两个图片描述任务的主要概念:补充内容。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(1):119-136. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
A Large-Scale Comparison of Main Concept Production Between Persons With Aphasia and Persons Without Brain Injury.大样本失语症患者与非脑损伤患者主要概念生成比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):293-320. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0166.
3
The development of a novel, standardized, norm-referenced Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT), including an examination of psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia.开发一种新型、标准化、基于常模的阿拉伯语语篇评估工具(ADAT),包括评估失语症患者语篇测量的心理测量特性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):2103-2117. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13083. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
Core-Lexicon and Main-Concept Production During Picture-Sequence Description in Adults Without Brain Damage and Adults With Aphasia.无脑损伤成年人和失语症成年人在图片序列描述过程中的核心词汇和主要概念生成
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S923-38. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0161.
5
A scoping review of transcription-less practices for analysis of aphasic discourse and implications for future research.无转录语料分析的范围综述及对未来研究的启示
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1734-1762. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13028. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
6
Discourse Task Type-Specific Linguistic Characteristics in Anomic Aphasia and Healthy Controls: Evidence From Mandarin-Chinese AphasiaBank.命名任务类型特异性语言特征在命名性失语症和健康对照组中的表现:来自汉语失语症语料库的证据。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Mar 7;33(2):937-951. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00078. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
7
Long-term Recovery in Stroke Accompanied by Aphasia: A Reconsideration.伴有失语症的中风患者的长期康复:重新审视
Aphasiology. 2017;31(2):152-165. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1184221. Epub 2016 May 27.
8
Correct Information Unit Analysis in Different Discourse Tasks Among Persons With Anomic Aphasia Based on Mandarin AphasiaBank.基于普通话失语症语料库的不同话语任务中命名性失语症患者正确信息单位分析
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Mar 7;33(2):800-813. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00217. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Applying core lexicon analysis in patients with anomic aphasia: Based on Mandarin AphasiaBank.在命名性失语症患者中应用核心词汇分析:基于普通话失语症语料库。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1875-1886. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12864. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
A Taiwanese Mandarin Main Concept Analysis (TM-MCA) for quantification of aphasic oral discourse.一种用于失语症口语语篇量化的台湾普通话主要概念分析(TM-MCA)。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Sep-Oct;50(5):580-92. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12157. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Real-Time Clinical Application of New Transcription-Less Discourse Assessment Approaches for Arabic Speakers With Aphasia.针对失语症阿拉伯语患者的新型无转录语篇评估方法的开发与实时临床应用
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 May-Jun;60(3):e70043. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70043.
2
Reliability of the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in Communication in Aphasia.失语症交流中交易成功简短评估的信度
Aphasiology. 2025;39(3):363-384. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2351029. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Age-related changes in connected speech production: evidence from eye-tracking in the culturally adapted picture description task.连贯言语产生中的年龄相关变化:来自文化适应图片描述任务中眼动追踪的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 22;15:1334788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1334788. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical Guidelines for Eliciting Discourse Using the RHDBank Protocol.使用 RHDBank 协议引出话语的临床指南。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Sep 7;31(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00097. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Making Sense of Right Hemisphere Discourse Using RHDBank.利用RHDBank理解右半球话语
Top Lang Disord. 2021 Jan-Mar;41(1):99-122. doi: 10.1097/tld.0000000000000244.
6
Spectral Resting-State EEG (rsEEG) in Chronic Aphasia Is Reliable, Sensitive, and Correlates With Functional Behavior.慢性失语症患者的静息态脑电频谱(rsEEG)具有可靠性、敏感性,且与功能行为相关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 17;15:624660. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.624660. eCollection 2021.
7
Main Concept, Sequencing, and Story Grammar Analyses of Cinderella Narratives in a Large Sample of Persons with Aphasia.对大量失语症患者样本中灰姑娘故事的主要概念、顺序和故事语法分析
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):110. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010110.
8
Moving Toward Non-transcription based Discourse Analysis in Stable and Progressive Aphasia.向稳定型和进行性失语症中的非转录基础话语分析转变。
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):32-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400990. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment.使用失语症语料库进行话语评估。
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):10-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399499. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
A Large-Scale Comparison of Main Concept Production Between Persons With Aphasia and Persons Without Brain Injury.大样本失语症患者与非脑损伤患者主要概念生成比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):293-320. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0166.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.失语症患者命名与故事梗概生成之间的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.
2
Evaluation of Language Predictors of Main Concept Production in Spanish/English Bilingual Discourse Using Nicholas and Brookshire Stimuli.使用 Nicholas 和 Brookshire 刺激物评估西班牙语/英语双语语篇中主要概念生成的语言预测因子。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Feb 6;27(1):52-70. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0186.
3
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.失语症中话语信息测量质量的综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Discourse Characteristics in Aphasia Beyond the Western Aphasia Battery Cutoff.失语症中超出西方失语症成套测验临界值的话语特征。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):762-768. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0071.
5
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
6
Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature.失语症话语的语言分析:文献综述
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(7):489-518. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
7
The Main Concept Analysis: Validation and sensitivity in differentiating discourse produced by unimpaired English speakers from individuals with aphasia and dementia of Alzheimer type.主要概念分析:区分无语言障碍的英语使用者与失语症患者及阿尔茨海默病型痴呆患者所产生话语的效度和敏感度。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016 Oct;41(3):129-41. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2015.1041551. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Beyond narrative: Is there an implicit structure to the way in which adults organise their discourse?超越叙事:成年人组织话语的方式是否存在隐含结构?
Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Jun;29(6):455-81. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1020450. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
The relationship of aphasia type and gesture production in people with aphasia.失语症类型与失语症患者手势生成的关系。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Nov;22(4):662-72. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0030). Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
AphasiaBank: Methods for Studying Discourse.失语症语料库:话语研究方法
Aphasiology. 2011;25(11):1286-1307. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.589893. Epub 2011 Sep 22.