Suppr超能文献

两个图片描述任务的主要概念:补充内容。

Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.

作者信息

Richardson Jessica D, Dalton Sarah Grace Hudspeth

机构信息

University of New Mexico, MSC 01 1195, Albuquerque, NM 87131, (505) 277-1765.

University of New Mexico, MSC 01 1195, Albuquerque, NM 87131, (470) 281-0470.

出版信息

Aphasiology. 2020;34(1):119-136. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proposition analysis of the discourse of persons with aphasia has a long history, yielding important advancements in our understanding of communication impairments in this population. Recently, discourse measures have been considered primary outcome measures, and multiple calls have been made for improved psychometric properties of discourse measures.

AIMS

To advance the use of discourse analysis in persons with aphasia by providing Main Concept Analysis checklists and descriptive statistics for healthy control performance on the analysis for the Cat in the Tree and Refused Umbrella narrative tasks utilized in the AphasiaBank database protocol.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: Ninety-two control transcripts, stratified into four age groups (20-39 years; 40-59; 60-79; 80+), were downloaded from the AphasiaBank database. Relevant concepts were identified, and those spoken by at least one-third of the control sample were considered to be a main concept. A multi-level coding system was used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the main concepts produced by control speakers.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Main concept checklists for two discourse tasks are provided. Descriptive statistics are reported and examined to assist readers with evaluation of the normative data.

CONCLUSIONS

These checklists provide clinicians and researchers with a tool to reliably assess the discourse of persons with aphasia. They also help address the gap in available psychometric data with which to compare persons with aphasia to healthy controls.

摘要

背景

失语症患者话语的命题分析有着悠久的历史,在我们对这一人群沟通障碍的理解方面取得了重要进展。最近,话语测量已被视为主要结局测量指标,并且多次呼吁改善话语测量的心理测量特性。

目的

通过提供主要概念分析清单以及失语症数据库协议中所使用的“树上的猫”和“拒绝雨伞”叙述任务分析中健康对照表现的描述性统计数据,推进失语症患者话语分析的应用。

方法与步骤

从失语症数据库下载了92份对照转录本,分为四个年龄组(20 - 39岁;40 - 59岁;60 - 79岁;80岁及以上)。确定了相关概念,至少三分之一的对照样本说出的概念被视为主要概念。使用多层次编码系统来确定对照说话者产生的主要概念的准确性和完整性。

结果与结论

提供了两个话语任务的主要概念清单。报告并检查了描述性统计数据,以帮助读者评估规范数据。

结论

这些清单为临床医生和研究人员提供了一种可靠评估失语症患者话语的工具。它们还有助于弥补现有心理测量数据方面的差距,以便将失语症患者与健康对照进行比较。

相似文献

1
Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to.
Aphasiology. 2020;34(1):119-136. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
A Large-Scale Comparison of Main Concept Production Between Persons With Aphasia and Persons Without Brain Injury.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):293-320. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0166.
5
A scoping review of transcription-less practices for analysis of aphasic discourse and implications for future research.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1734-1762. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13028. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
6
Discourse Task Type-Specific Linguistic Characteristics in Anomic Aphasia and Healthy Controls: Evidence From Mandarin-Chinese AphasiaBank.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Mar 7;33(2):937-951. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00078. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
7
Long-term Recovery in Stroke Accompanied by Aphasia: A Reconsideration.
Aphasiology. 2017;31(2):152-165. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1184221. Epub 2016 May 27.
8
Correct Information Unit Analysis in Different Discourse Tasks Among Persons With Anomic Aphasia Based on Mandarin AphasiaBank.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Mar 7;33(2):800-813. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00217. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Applying core lexicon analysis in patients with anomic aphasia: Based on Mandarin AphasiaBank.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1875-1886. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12864. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
A Taiwanese Mandarin Main Concept Analysis (TM-MCA) for quantification of aphasic oral discourse.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Sep-Oct;50(5):580-92. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12157. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Reliability of the Brief Assessment of Transactional Success in Communication in Aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2025;39(3):363-384. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2351029. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Age-related changes in connected speech production: evidence from eye-tracking in the culturally adapted picture description task.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 22;15:1334788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1334788. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical Guidelines for Eliciting Discourse Using the RHDBank Protocol.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Sep 7;31(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00097. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Making Sense of Right Hemisphere Discourse Using RHDBank.
Top Lang Disord. 2021 Jan-Mar;41(1):99-122. doi: 10.1097/tld.0000000000000244.
6
Spectral Resting-State EEG (rsEEG) in Chronic Aphasia Is Reliable, Sensitive, and Correlates With Functional Behavior.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 17;15:624660. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.624660. eCollection 2021.
8
Moving Toward Non-transcription based Discourse Analysis in Stable and Progressive Aphasia.
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):32-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400990. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment.
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):10-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399499. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
A Large-Scale Comparison of Main Concept Production Between Persons With Aphasia and Persons Without Brain Injury.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):293-320. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0166.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Mar 1;27(1S):406-422. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211.
3
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Discourse Characteristics in Aphasia Beyond the Western Aphasia Battery Cutoff.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):762-768. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0071.
5
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
6
Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(7):489-518. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Beyond narrative: Is there an implicit structure to the way in which adults organise their discourse?
Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Jun;29(6):455-81. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1020450. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
The relationship of aphasia type and gesture production in people with aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Nov;22(4):662-72. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0030). Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
AphasiaBank: Methods for Studying Discourse.
Aphasiology. 2011;25(11):1286-1307. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.589893. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验