• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调节过剩:慈善与食物浪费围合的法律地理

Regulating surplus: charity and the legal geographies of food waste enclosure.

作者信息

Lohnes Joshua D

机构信息

Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, 98 Beechurst Ave, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA.

出版信息

Agric Human Values. 2021;38(2):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10150-5. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10460-020-10150-5
PMID:32952292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7486967/
Abstract

Food charity in the United States has grown into a critical appendage of agro-food supply chains. In 2016, 4.5 billion pounds of food waste was diverted through a network of 200 regional food banks, a fivefold increase in just 20 years. Recent global trade disruptions and the COVID-19 pandemic have further reinforced this trend. Economic geographers studying charitable food networks argue that its infrastructure and moral substructure serve to revalue food waste and surplus labor in the capitalist food system. The political-legal framework undergirding this revaluation process however is still poorly understood. Drawing on a 6-year institutional ethnography of the food banking economy in West Virginia, this paper takes a supply-side approach to examine the material and moral values driving the expansion of food waste recovery as hunger relief. Empirically, it focuses on the laws, contracts and fiscal incentives regulating charitable food procurement at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Feeding America. The assemblage of government agencies, private businesses and non-profit organizations enrolled into this gift economy at different scales I argue, serves to enclose food waste into a public-private governance structure that regulates food surpluses and ensures these will not disrupt the scarcity logics driving profitability along primary food circuits.

摘要

美国的食品慈善事业已发展成为农业食品供应链的一个关键附属部分。2016年,通过200个区域食品银行网络转移了45亿磅的食物垃圾,在短短20年内增长了五倍。近期的全球贸易中断和新冠疫情进一步强化了这一趋势。研究慈善食品网络的经济地理学家认为,其基础设施和道德基础结构有助于在资本主义食品体系中重新评估食物垃圾和剩余劳动力的价值。然而,支撑这一重新评估过程的政治法律框架仍未得到充分理解。本文以西弗吉尼亚州食品银行经济的六年制度民族志为基础,采用供应方的方法来研究推动将食物垃圾回收作为饥饿救济手段而进行扩张的物质和道德价值。从实证角度看,它聚焦于美国农业部和“美国粮食救助”组织中规范慈善食品采购的法律、合同和财政激励措施。我认为,不同规模参与到这个馈赠经济中的政府机构、私营企业和非营利组织的集合,有助于将食物垃圾纳入一个公私治理结构,该结构对食物盈余进行监管,并确保这些不会扰乱驱动主要食品流通环节盈利能力的稀缺逻辑。

相似文献

1
Regulating surplus: charity and the legal geographies of food waste enclosure.调节过剩:慈善与食物浪费围合的法律地理
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(2):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10150-5. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
The corporate influence on food charity and aid: The "Hunger Industrial Complex" and the death of welfare.企业对食品慈善和援助的影响:“饥饿工业综合体”与福利的消亡。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;10:950955. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950955. eCollection 2022.
3
Opportunities, challenges and trade-offs with decreasing avoidable food waste in the UK.减少英国可避免食物浪费的机会、挑战和权衡。
Waste Manag Res. 2021 Mar;39(3):473-488. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20983427. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
4
The international political economy of food: a global crisis.粮食的国际政治经济学:一场全球危机。
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(3):511-38. doi: 10.2190/451A-896W-GGLK-ELXT.
5
Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy.迈向食品过剩、浪费和损失的透明增值:定义、食品浪费层次结构和在循环经济中的作用的澄清。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 1;706:136033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136033. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlook.全球和欧洲食品供应链中的食物浪费核算:现状与展望。
Waste Manag. 2018 Sep;79:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Geography and the study of Third World underdevelopment re-revisited.再探地理与第三世界发展不足研究
Prog Hum Geogr. 1989;13(2):267-76. doi: 10.1177/030913258901300207.
8
Problems, policy and politics - perspectives of public health leaders on food insecurity and human rights in Australia.问题、政策与政治——澳大利亚公共卫生领导人对粮食不安全与人权的看法
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11188-8.
9
Public-private interactions in global food safety governance.全球食品安全治理中的公私互动。
Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(2):143-60, i.
10
Brazilian Food Banks: Overview and Perspectives.巴西食品银行:概述与展望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;18(23):12598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312598.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainable food systems transformation in the face of climate change: strategies, challenges, and policy implications.面对气候变化的可持续粮食系统转型:战略、挑战及政策影响。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 18;34(4):871-883. doi: 10.1007/s10068-024-01712-y. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Food insecurities and dependencies: Indigenous food responses to COVID-19.粮食不安全与依赖:原住民对新冠疫情的食物应对措施
AlterNative (Nga Pae Maramatanga (Organ)). 2023 Mar;19(1):204-210. doi: 10.1177/11771801221137639. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Ambient struggling: food, chronic disease, and spatial isolation among the urban poor.周边困境:城市贫困人口的食物、慢性病与空间隔离
Agric Human Values. 2022 Dec 23:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10408-0.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic and food assistance organizations' responses in New York's Capital District.新冠疫情与纽约首府地区食品援助组织的应对措施。
Agric Human Values. 2022 Dec 3:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10400-8.
5
Containing Hunger, Contesting Injustice? Exploring the Transnational Growth of Foodbanking- and Counter-responses- Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.遏制饥饿,对抗不公?探索食品银行跨国发展及应对措施——新冠疫情之前及期间
Food Ethics. 2022;7(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
6
The acorn squash problem: a digestible conceptualisation of barriers to emergency food assistance.橡果南瓜问题:对紧急食品援助障碍的可理解概念化。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Apr;25(4):1045-1049. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003748. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
7
Food support provision in COVID-19 times: a mixed method study based in Greater Manchester.新冠疫情期间的食品支持供应:一项基于大曼彻斯特地区的混合方法研究。
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(4):1201-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10212-2. Epub 2021 Apr 26.