Suppr超能文献

居家办公与收入不平等:新冠疫情下“新常态”的风险。

Working from home and income inequality: risks of a 'new normal' with COVID-19.

作者信息

Bonacini Luca, Gallo Giovanni, Scicchitano Sergio

机构信息

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

National Institute for Public Policies Analysis (INAPP), Corso d'Italia 33, 00198 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):303-360. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

Abstract

In the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home (WFH) became of great importance for a large share of employees since it represents the only option to both continue working and minimise the risk of virus exposure. Uncertainty about the duration of the pandemic and future contagion waves even led companies to view WFH as a 'new normal' way of working. Based on influence function regression methods, this paper explores the potential consequences in the labour income distribution related to a long-lasting increase in WFH feasibility among Italian employees. Results show that a positive shift in WFH feasibility would be associated with an increase in average labour income, but this potential benefit would not be equally distributed among employees. Specifically, an increase in the opportunity to WFH would favour male, older, high-educated, and high-paid employees. However, this 'forced innovation' would benefit more employees living in provinces have been more affected by the novel coronavirus. WFH thus risks exacerbating pre-existing inequalities in the labour market, especially if it will not be adequately regulated. As a consequence, this study suggests that policies aimed at alleviating inequality, like income support measures (in the short run) and human capital interventions (in the long run), should play a more important compensating role in the future.

摘要

在当前新冠疫情的背景下,居家办公对很大一部分员工来说变得至关重要,因为这是既能继续工作又能将病毒暴露风险降至最低的唯一选择。疫情持续时间和未来传染波的不确定性甚至促使企业将居家办公视为一种“新常态”的工作方式。基于影响函数回归方法,本文探讨了意大利员工中居家办公可行性长期增加对劳动收入分配的潜在影响。结果表明,居家办公可行性的正向变化将与平均劳动收入的增加相关,但这种潜在收益不会在员工中平均分配。具体而言,居家办公机会的增加将有利于男性、年龄较大、受教育程度高和高薪的员工。然而,这种“被迫创新”将使更多居住在受新冠病毒影响更严重省份的员工受益。因此,居家办公有加剧劳动力市场中现有不平等的风险,尤其是在缺乏适当监管的情况下。因此,本研究表明,旨在缓解不平等的政策,如(短期内的)收入支持措施和(长期内的)人力资本干预措施,未来应发挥更重要的补偿作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9946/7486597/0ac9d172b8ba/148_2020_800_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Working from home and income inequality: risks of a 'new normal' with COVID-19.
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):303-360. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
The effect of preference and actual days spent working from home on stress and musculoskeletal pain in older workers.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Oct;96(8):1113-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01992-7. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work.
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):229-265. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01124-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Work-From-Home in the New Normal: A Phenomenological Inquiry into Employees' Mental Health.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):48. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010048.
5
Desire to work from home: Results of an Irish study.
J Transp Geogr. 2022 Oct;104:103416. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103416. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Working from home and its implications for strategic transport modelling based on the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Jun;148:64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence.
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303307. eCollection 2024.
8
Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies.
J Syst Softw. 2023 Jan;195:111552. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
9
Reconstructing Attitudes towards Work from Home during COVID-19: A Survey of South Korean Managers.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;11(12):163. doi: 10.3390/bs11120163.
10
Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.
Labour Econ. 2023 Jan;80:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102295. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Income and Well-Being Inequality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.
Soc Indic Res. 2024 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03478-6.
3
Does the digital economy promote or inhibit income inequality?
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(14):e33533. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33533. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
7
Exploring the restorative benefits of work in smart working structures on vacations in small villages.
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1232318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232318. eCollection 2023.
8
The Gender Wage Gap and Parenthood: Occupational Characteristics Across European Countries.
Eur J Popul. 2023 Nov 30;39(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10680-023-09681-4.
9
Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work.
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):229-265. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01124-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
10
Smart Cities Mission in the Face of COVID: Scope and Scale of 'Smart' COVID Responses in India.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;20(22):7036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227036.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-Term Effect of COVID-19 on Self-Employed Workers in Canada.
Can Public Policy. 2020 Jul 1;46(Suppl 1):S66-S81. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2020-076.
2
The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0270341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270341. eCollection 2023.
3
The COVID-19 crisis and telework: a research survey on experiences, expectations and hopes.
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Jun;23(4):729-753. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01392-z. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):509-526. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09487-6. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19.
J Econ Surv. 2021 Sep;35(4):1007-1044. doi: 10.1111/joes.12423. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends.
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104346. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
7
True COVID-19 mortality rates from administrative data.
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):253-274. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00801-6. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Business disruptions from social distancing.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239113. eCollection 2020.
9
Identifying policy challenges of COVID-19 in hardly reliable data and judging the success of lockdown measures.
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):275-301. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00799-x. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
COVID-19 outbreak, social response, and early economic effects: a global VAR analysis of cross-country interdependencies.
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):223-252. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00792-4. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验