• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理层对员工居家办公的(不)偏好:后疫情时期的实验证据。

Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence.

机构信息

Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303307. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303307
PMID:38748733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11095720/
Abstract

Work from home (WFH) has been a part of the professional landscape for over two decades, yet it was the COVID-19 pandemic that has substantially increased its prevalence. The impact of WFH on careers is rather ambiguous, and a question remains open about how this effect is manifested in the current times considering the recent extensive and widespread use of WFH during the pandemic. To answer these questions, this article investigates whether managerial preferences for promotion, salary increase and training allowance depend on employee engagement in WFH. We take into account the employee's gender, parental status as well as the frequency of WFH. Furthermore, we examine whether managers' experience with WFH and its prevalence in the team moderate the effect of WFH on careers. An online survey experiment was run on a sample of over 1,000 managers from the United Kingdom. The experiment was conducted between July and December 2022. The findings indicate that employees who WFH are less likely to be considered for promotion, salary increase and training than on-site workers. The pay and promotion penalties for WFH are particularly true for men (both fathers and non-fathers) and childless women, but not mothers. We also find that employees operating in teams with a higher prevalence of WFH do not experience negative career effects when working from home. Additionally, the more WFH experience the manager has, the lesser the career penalty for engaging in this mode of working. Our study not only provides evidence on WFH and career outcomes in the post-pandemic context but also furthers previous understanding of how WFH impacts careers by showing its effect across different groups of employees, highlighting the importance of familiarisation and social acceptance of flexible working arrangements in their impact on career outcomes.

摘要

居家办公(WFH)已经成为专业领域二十多年的一部分,但正是 COVID-19 大流行使其普及度大大提高。WFH 对职业发展的影响相当模糊,考虑到最近在大流行期间广泛而广泛地使用 WFH,目前仍存在一个问题,即这种影响是如何表现出来的。为了回答这些问题,本文研究了经理对晋升、加薪和培训津贴的偏好是否取决于员工参与 WFH。我们考虑了员工的性别、父母身份以及 WFH 的频率。此外,我们还研究了经理的 WFH 经验及其在团队中的流行程度是否会调节 WFH 对职业的影响。我们在英国的一个由 1000 多名经理组成的样本上进行了在线调查实验。实验于 2022 年 7 月至 12 月进行。调查结果表明,与现场工作的员工相比,居家办公的员工不太可能被考虑晋升、加薪和培训。对于男性(无论是父亲还是非父亲)和没有孩子的女性来说,WFH 的薪酬和晋升惩罚尤其严重,但对母亲则不然。我们还发现,在 WFH 流行程度较高的团队中工作的员工,在家工作时不会经历负面的职业影响。此外,经理的 WFH 经验越多,从事这种工作模式的职业惩罚就越小。我们的研究不仅提供了大流行后 WFH 和职业结果的证据,还通过展示 WFH 对不同员工群体的职业发展的影响,进一步加深了对 WFH 如何影响职业发展的理解,突出了熟悉和接受灵活工作安排对职业结果的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/93a43ab87c89/pone.0303307.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/0e9cc0a2c505/pone.0303307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/d6e544f1a634/pone.0303307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/3719888f5ec9/pone.0303307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/93a43ab87c89/pone.0303307.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/0e9cc0a2c505/pone.0303307.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/d6e544f1a634/pone.0303307.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/3719888f5ec9/pone.0303307.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/11095720/93a43ab87c89/pone.0303307.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence.管理层对员工居家办公的(不)偏好:后疫情时期的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303307. eCollection 2024.
2
Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees' Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress.新冠疫情期间在家办公:对员工远程工作生产力、参与度和压力的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jul 1;63(7):e426-e432. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236.
3
Teleworking from home experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic among public health workers (TelEx COVID-19 study).远程居家办公体验在 COVID-19 大流行期间的公共卫生工作者中(TelEx COVID-19 研究)。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13031-0.
4
Does working from home work? That depends on the home.在家办公是否有效?这取决于办公环境。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0306475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306475. eCollection 2024.
5
The changing dynamics of work from home and its association with sleep disturbance through work-family conflict during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间居家办公动态变化及其通过工作-家庭冲突与睡眠障碍的关系。
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae014.
6
Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间在欧洲居家办公的六大优势与劣势
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041826.
7
Working from home and productivity under the COVID-19 pandemic: Using survey data of four manufacturing firms.新冠疫情下居家办公与生产力:基于四家制造企业的调查数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261761. eCollection 2021.
8
Negotiating Time and Space When Working From Home: Experiences During COVID-19.居家办公时对时间和空间的协商利用:COVID-19 期间的经历。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2021 Oct;41(4):223-231. doi: 10.1177/15394492211033830. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Study on Psychological Stress Perceived among Employees in an Italian University during Mandatory and Voluntary Remote Working during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间及之后,意大利一所大学员工在强制和自愿远程工作期间所感知的心理压力研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;21(4):403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040403.
10
Associations of working from home with occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior under the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间居家办公与职业体力活动和久坐行为的关联。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12212. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12212.

本文引用的文献

1
Working from home and subsequent work outcomes: Pre-pandemic evidence.居家办公与随后的工作成果:疫情前的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 4;18(4):e0283788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283788. eCollection 2023.
2
Working from Home in Urban China during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assemblages of Work-Family Interference.新冠疫情期间中国城市的居家办公:工作-家庭干扰的组合
Work Employ Soc. 2023 Feb;37(1):157-175. doi: 10.1177/09500170221080870. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.
家,甜蜜的家:英国新冠疫情期间的居家办公与员工绩效
Labour Econ. 2023 Jan;80:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102295. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Learning from work-from-home issues during the COVID-19 pandemic: Balance speaks louder than words.从 COVID-19 大流行期间远程办公问题中学习:平衡胜于言辞。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261969. eCollection 2022.
5
A Taxonomy of Employee Motives for Telework.远程办公员工动机分类法。
Occup Health Sci. 2022;6(2):149-178. doi: 10.1007/s41542-021-00094-5. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges.居家办公的研究人员:好处与挑战。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249127. eCollection 2021.
7
Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective.在新冠疫情期间实现有效的远程办公:工作设计视角
Appl Psychol. 2021 Jan;70(1):16-59. doi: 10.1111/apps.12290. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Flexible Working, Work-Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction.弹性工作、工作与生活的平衡以及性别平等:引言
Soc Indic Res. 2020;151(2):365-381. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Women's and men's work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19.新冠疫情之前及期间的女性和男性工作、家务劳动与儿童照料
Rev Econ Househ. 2020;18(4):1001-1017. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
10
How many jobs can be done at home?有多少工作可以在家完成?
J Public Econ. 2020 Sep;189:104235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235. Epub 2020 Jul 9.