Drutz D J
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Mar-Apr;9(2):392-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.2.392.
Interpretation of in vitro susceptibility data for antifungal drugs is hindered by the absence of standardized test criteria. Thus, it is extremely difficult to identify a clear relation between minimal inhibitory concentrations and clinical outcome. The situation appears more readily resolvable for yeast-like than for filamentous fungi since the former are more easily quantified by standardized microbiologic techniques. Accordingly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards has initiated the process of developing standards for yeast susceptibility testing. A related issue concerns the measurement of antifungal agents in body fluids. Whereas there may be little value in measuring concentrations of amphotericin B (because of its predictable pharmacokinetics), there is value to measuring levels of flucytosine (serum concentrations may relate to bone marrow suppression and/or the development of drug resistance) and ketoconazole (which may be absorbed unpredictably from the gut). Laboratory standards for these measurements have not been established.
由于缺乏标准化的测试标准,抗真菌药物体外药敏数据的解读受到阻碍。因此,很难确定最低抑菌浓度与临床结果之间的明确关系。对于酵母样真菌而言,情况似乎比丝状真菌更容易解决,因为前者更容易通过标准化微生物技术进行定量。因此,美国国家临床实验室标准委员会已启动制定酵母药敏试验标准的进程。一个相关问题涉及体液中抗真菌药物的测量。虽然测量两性霉素B的浓度可能没什么价值(因为其药代动力学可预测),但测量氟胞嘧啶的水平(血清浓度可能与骨髓抑制和/或耐药性的产生有关)以及酮康唑(其可能从肠道吸收不可预测)是有价值的。这些测量的实验室标准尚未确立。