St-Germain G, Lapierre S, Tessier D
Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1403-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1403.
We compared the accuracy and precision of two microbiological methods and one high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure used to measure the concentrations of flucytosine in serum. On the basis of an analysis of six standards, all methods were judged reliable within acceptable limits for clinical use. With the biological methods, a slight loss of linearity was observed in the 75- to 100-micrograms/ml range. Compared with the bioassays, the HPLC method did not present linearity problems and was more precise and accurate in the critical zone of 100 micrograms/ml. On average, results obtained with patient sera containing 50 to 100 micrograms of flucytosine per ml were 10.6% higher with the HPLC method than with the bioassays. Standards for the biological assays may be prepared in serum or water.
我们比较了两种微生物学方法和一种用于测量血清中氟胞嘧啶浓度的高压液相色谱(HPLC)方法的准确性和精密度。基于对六种标准品的分析,所有方法在临床应用的可接受限度内均被判定为可靠。使用生物学方法时,在75至100微克/毫升范围内观察到线性略有损失。与生物测定法相比,HPLC方法不存在线性问题,并且在100微克/毫升的关键区域更精确、准确。平均而言,每毫升含有50至100微克氟胞嘧啶的患者血清样本,HPLC方法得到的结果比生物测定法高10.6%。生物学测定的标准品可以在血清或水中制备。