Suppr超能文献

我们内部 3D 打印的生物模型和手术导板常用的消毒方法是否完全有效?

Are the common sterilization methods completely effective for our in-house 3D printed biomodels and surgical guides?

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery. Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega, Calle Dulzaina 2, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.

Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega, Calle Dulzaina 2, 47012, Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1341-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In-hospital 3D printing is being implemented in orthopaedic departments worldwide, being used for additive manufacturing of fracture models (or even surgical guides) which are sterilized and used in the operating room. However, to save time and material, prints are nearly hollow, while 3D printers are placed in non-sterile rooms. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether common sterilization methods can sterilize the inside of the pieces, which would be of utmost importance in case a model breaks during a surgical intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 24 cylinders were designed and printed with a 3D printer in Polylactic Acid (PLA) with an infill density of 12%. Manufacturing was paused when 60% of the print was reached and 20 of the cylinders were inoculated with 0.4 mL of a suspension of S epidermidis ATTCC 1228 in saline solution at turbidity 1 McFarland. Printing was resumed, being all the pieces completely sealed with the inoculum inside. Posteriorly, 4 groups were made according to the chosen sterilization method: Ethylene Oxide (EtO), Gas Plasma, Steam Heat or non-sterilized (positive control). Each group included 5 contaminated cylinders and 1 non-contaminated cylinder as a negative control. After sterilization, the inside of the cylinders was cultured during 7 days.

RESULTS

We observed bacterial growth of just a few Forming Colony Units (FCU) in 4 out of 5 positive controls and in 2 out of 5 contaminated cylinders sterilized with Gas Plasma. We could not assess any bacterial growth in any of the EtO or Steam Heat samples or in any of the negative controls. Pieces sterilized under Steam Heat resulted completely deformed.

CONCLUSIONS

High temperatures reached during the procedure of additive manufacturing can decrease the bacterial load of the biomodels. However, there is a potential risk of contamination during the procedure. We recommend sterilization with EtO for in-hospital 3D-printed PLA hollow biomodels or guides. Otherwise, in case of using Gas Plasma, an infill of 100% should be applied.

摘要

简介

在全球范围内,骨科部门正在实施住院 3D 打印,用于增材制造骨折模型(甚至手术指南),这些模型经过消毒后可在手术室使用。然而,为了节省时间和材料,打印件通常是空心的,而 3D 打印机则放置在非无菌房间内。我们的研究目的是评估常见的消毒方法是否可以对模型内部进行消毒,因为如果模型在手术过程中破裂,这将是至关重要的。

材料和方法

总共设计并打印了 24 个圆柱体,使用 3D 打印机以聚乳酸(PLA)为材料,填充密度为 12%。当打印完成 60%时,制造过程暂停,将 20 个圆柱体用 0.4 毫升含有金黄色葡萄球菌 ATCC 1228 的生理盐水混悬液接种,浊度为 1 McFarland。打印继续进行,所有的圆柱体都完全密封,接种物都在里面。随后,根据所选的消毒方法将其分为 4 组:环氧乙烷(EtO)、气体等离子体、蒸汽热或未消毒(阳性对照)。每组包括 5 个污染的圆柱体和 1 个未污染的圆柱体作为阴性对照。消毒后,将圆柱体内部培养 7 天。

结果

我们观察到在 4 个阳性对照中有 5 个和在 5 个用气体等离子体消毒的污染圆柱体中有 2 个污染圆柱体中只有少数形成菌落单位(FCU)的细菌生长。我们在任何 EtO 或蒸汽热样本或任何阴性对照中都没有观察到任何细菌生长。用蒸汽热消毒的样本完全变形。

结论

在增材制造过程中达到的高温可以降低生物模型的细菌负荷。然而,在操作过程中存在潜在的污染风险。我们建议对医院内使用 PLA 空心生物模型或指南进行 3D 打印采用 EtO 进行消毒。否则,如果使用气体等离子体,应应用 100%的填充率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验