• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种新型的、无实验室的 SARS-CoV-2(CovidNudge)即时护理检测方法:一项诊断准确性研究。

Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK.

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Microbe. 2020 Nov;1(7):e300-e307. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X
PMID:32964211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7498257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe our diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care real time RT-PCR CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing.

METHODS

Between April and May, 2020, we obtained two nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals in three hospitals in London and Oxford (UK). Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred health-care workers with suspected COVID-19; patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19; and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19. For the CovidNudge test, nasopharyngeal swabs were inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (-gene, -gene, n1, n2 and n3) and human ribonuclease P () as sample adequacy control. Swab samples were tested in parallel using the CovidNudge platform, and with standard laboratory RT-PCR using swabs in viral transport medium for processing in a central laboratory. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the point-of-care CovidNudge test with laboratory-based testing.

FINDINGS

We obtained 386 paired samples: 280 (73%) from self-referred health-care workers, 15 (4%) from patients in the emergency department, and 91 (23%) hospital inpatient admissions. Of the 386 paired samples, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge point-of-care platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity of the point-of-care test compared with laboratory-based testing was 94% (95% CI 86-98) with an overall specificity of 100% (99-100). The sensitivity of the test varied by group (self-referred healthcare workers 94% [95% CI 85-98]; patients in the emergency department 100% [48-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [29-100]). Specificity was consistent between groups (self-referred health-care workers 100% [95% CI 98-100]; patients in the emergency department 100% [69-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [96-100]). Point of care testing performance was similar during a period of high background prevalence of laboratory positive tests (25% [95% 20-31] in April, 2020) and low prevalence (3% [95% 1-9] in inpatient screening). Amplification of viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, and n3) and envelope protein gene (e-gene) were most sensitive for detection of spiked SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

INTERPRETATION

The CovidNudge platform was a sensitive, specific, and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The device, which has been implemented in UK hospitals since May, 2020, could enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programmes.

FUNDING

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, and DnaNudge.

摘要

背景

快速诊断是控制和管理严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的关键。实验室 RT-PCR 检测是目前的标准护理方法,但通常需要集中的实验室和大量的基础设施。我们描述了一种新型快速即时 RT-PCR CovidNudge 检测的诊断准确性评估,该检测不需要实验室处理或样本预处理。

方法

2020 年 4 月至 5 月,我们从伦敦和牛津(英国)的三家医院的三名个体中获得了两个鼻咽拭子样本。样本取自三组人群:自我推荐的疑似 COVID-19 的医护人员;有疑似 COVID-19 的急诊患者;有或无疑似 COVID-19 的住院患者。对于 CovidNudge 检测,将鼻咽拭子直接插入包含 RT-PCR 反应所需的所有试剂和成分的试剂盒中,包括 SARS-CoV-2 基因靶标(-基因、-基因、n1、n2 和 n3)的七个和人核糖核酸酶 P()作为样本充足性对照的多个技术重复。使用 CovidNudge 平台和标准实验室 RT-PCR 平行检测拭子样本,用拭子在病毒运输介质中进行处理,在中央实验室进行检测。主要分析是比较床边 CovidNudge 检测与基于实验室的检测的敏感性和特异性。

结果

我们获得了 386 对样本:280 对(73%)来自自我推荐的医护人员,15 对(4%)来自急诊患者,91 对(23%)住院患者。在 386 对样本中,67 对在 CovidNudge 床边平台上检测呈阳性,71 对在标准实验室 RT-PCR 上检测呈阳性。与基于实验室的检测相比,床边检测的总体敏感性为 94%(95%CI 86-98),总体特异性为 100%(99-100)。该测试的敏感性因组而异(自我推荐的医护人员 94%[95%CI 85-98%];急诊患者 100%[48-100%];住院患者 100%[29-100%])。各组间特异性一致(自我推荐的医护人员 100%[95%CI 98-100%];急诊患者 100%[69-100%];住院患者 100%[96-100%])。在实验室阳性检测背景患病率较高(2020 年 4 月为 25%[95%20-31%])和较低(住院筛查为 3%[95%1-9%])期间,床边检测性能相似。病毒核衣壳(n1、n2 和 n3)和包膜蛋白基因(e-基因)的扩增对检测 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 最为敏感。

结论

CovidNudge 平台是一种灵敏、特异、快速的床边检测方法,无需实验室处理或样本预处理即可检测 SARS-CoV-2。自 2020 年 5 月以来,该设备已在英国医院实施,可为临床护理和检测计划提供快速决策。

资助

英国国民保健制度(NHS)帝国生物医学研究中心、牛津大学公共卫生英格兰合作的与医院获得性感染和抗菌素耐药性相关的 NHS 健康保护研究单位、牛津大学 NHS 生物医学研究中心和 DnaNudge。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/7498257/ee302a41b47f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/7498257/07a1535540dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/7498257/ee302a41b47f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/7498257/07a1535540dc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/7498257/ee302a41b47f/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study.评估一种新型的、无实验室的 SARS-CoV-2(CovidNudge)即时护理检测方法:一项诊断准确性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Nov;1(7):e300-e307. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
2
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
3
Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.SARS-CoV-2 侧向流动抗原检测的比较性能及其与临床标本中传染性病毒检测的关联:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Sep;2(9):e461-e471. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
5
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
6
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
7
Performance of antigen lateral flow devices in the UK during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a diagnostic and observational study.抗原侧向流动设备在英国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的阿尔法、德尔塔和奥密克戎波期间的表现:一项诊断和观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug;23(8):922-932. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00129-9. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
8
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
9
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.
10
Modelling of hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care tests on admission to hospital from A&E: rapid cost-effectiveness analysis.急诊科入院时假设的 SARS-CoV-2 即时检测模型:快速成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25210.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing in-vitro diagnostic point-of-care tests in community health care: how can we make this work?在社区医疗保健中实施即时检验体外诊断检测:我们如何才能使其发挥作用?
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):182-185. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X741153. Print 2025 Apr.
2
Comparison of Two Field Deployable PCR Platforms for SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A and B Viruses' Detection.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及甲型和乙型流感病毒的两种现场可部署PCR平台的比较
Pathogens. 2025 Jan 3;14(1):27. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14010027.
3
Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the false-negative test probability of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.估算 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Dec;25(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.50.2000568.
2
False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review.COVID-19 初始 RT-PCR 检测的假阴性结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242958. eCollection 2020.
3
Performance Evaluation of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test for Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
克服逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测错误结果的策略:来自COVID-19大流行的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72954. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Evaluation of a near-patient SARS-CoV-2 novel rapid diagnostic platform.一种新型即时检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)快速诊断平台的评估
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 18;12(12):e0067224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00672-24.
5
Utilizing cost-effective portable equipment to enhance COVID-19 variant tracking both on-site and at a large scale.利用具有成本效益的便携式设备,在现场和大规模范围内加强对 COVID-19 变异株的跟踪。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0155823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01558-23. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Integrated approach for detection of SARS-CoV-2 and its variant by utilizing LAMP and ARMS-PCR.利用环介导等温扩增和 ARMS-PCR 的 SARS-CoV-2 及其变体的综合检测方法。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Feb 1;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12941-023-00665-0.
7
VIDIIA Hunter diagnostic platform: a low-cost, smartphone connected, artificial intelligence-assisted COVID-19 rapid diagnostics approved for medical use in the UK.VIDIIA Hunter诊断平台:一款低成本、与智能手机连接且由人工智能辅助的COVID-19快速诊断产品,已在英国获批用于医疗用途。
Front Mol Biosci. 2023 Sep 28;10:1144001. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1144001. eCollection 2023.
8
Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based electrochemical test for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2.开发一种基于环介导等温扩增(LAMP)的电化学检测方法用于快速检测新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)
iScience. 2023 Aug 9;26(9):107570. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107570. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
9
Recent progress on rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 by point-of-care testing platforms.即时检测平台在新型冠状病毒肺炎快速诊断方面的最新进展
Chin Chem Lett. 2023 Jun 15:108688. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108688.
10
The QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for rapid detection of COVID-19 at point-of-care: preliminary evaluation of a novel technology.QuantumDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测试剂盒,用于在护理点快速检测 COVID-19:一种新型技术的初步评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 17;13(1):9827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9.
SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒用于即时检测 SARS-CoV-2 的性能评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01262-20.
4
Swabs Collected by Patients or Health Care Workers for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.患者或医护人员采集的用于新型冠状病毒检测的拭子。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):494-496. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016321. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Improved sensitivity using a dual target, E and RdRp assay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Experience at a large NHS Foundation Trust in the UK.采用双靶点E和RdRp检测法提高SARS-CoV-2感染诊断的敏感性:英国一家大型国民保健服务基金会信托机构的经验。
J Infect. 2021 Jan;82(1):159-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.061. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
7
Molecular Testing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Clinical and Diagnostic Recommendations From the IDSA's Diagnostics Committee.急性呼吸道感染的分子检测:来自 IDSA 诊断委员会的临床和诊断建议。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2744-2751. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa508.
8
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.新冠病毒脱落和传播的时间动态。
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒:将 2019-nCoV 进行分类并命名为 SARS-CoV-2。
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):536-544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. Epub 2020 Mar 2.