Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17850.
Adverse childhood experiences are a public health issue with negative sequelae that persist throughout life. Current theories suggest that adverse childhood experiences reflect underlying dimensions (eg, violence exposure and social deprivation) with distinct neural mechanisms; however, research findings have been inconsistent, likely owing to variability in how the environment interacts with the brain.
To examine whether dimensional exposure to childhood adversity is associated with person-specific patterns in adolescent resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), defined as synchronized activity across brain regions when not engaged in a task.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A sparse network approach in a large sample with substantial representation of understudied, underserved African American youth was used to conduct an observational, population-based longitudinal cohort study. A total of 183 adolescents aged 15 to 17 years from Detroit, Michigan; Toledo, Ohio; and Chicago, Illinois, who participated in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study were eligible for inclusion. Environmental data from birth to adolescence were collected via telephone and in-person interviews, and neuroimaging data collected at a university lab. The study was conducted from February 1, 1998, to April 26, 2017, and data analysis was performed from January 3, 2019, to May 22, 2020.
Composite variables representing violence exposure and social deprivation created from primary caregiver reports on children at ages 3, 5, and 9 years.
Resting-state functional connectivity person-specific network metrics (data-driven subgroup membership, density, and node degree) focused on connectivity among a priori regions of interest in 2 resting-state networks (salience network and default mode) assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Of the 183 eligible adolescents, 175 individuals (98 girls [56%]) were included in the analysis; mean (SD) age was 15.88 (0.53) years and 127 participants (73%) were African American. Adolescents with high violence exposure were 3.06 times more likely (95% CI, 1.17-8.92) to be in a subgroup characterized by high heterogeneity (few shared connections) and low network density (sparsity). Childhood violence exposure, but not social deprivation, was associated with reduced rsFC density (β = -0.25; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.05; P = .005), with fewer salience network connections (β = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.08; P = .005) and salience network-default mode connections (β = -0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.03; P = .02). Violence exposure was associated with node degree of right anterior insula (β = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.12; P = .001) and left inferior parietal lobule (β = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.09; P = .003).
The findings of this study suggest that childhood violence exposure is associated with adolescent neural network sparsity. A community-detection algorithm, blinded to child adversity, grouped youth exposed to heightened violence based only on patterns of rsFC. The findings may have implications for understanding how dimensions of adverse childhood experiences impact individualized neural development.
童年逆境是一个公共卫生问题,具有贯穿一生的负面影响。目前的理论表明,童年逆境反映了潜在的维度(例如,暴力暴露和社会剥夺),具有不同的神经机制;然而,研究结果一直不一致,这可能是由于环境与大脑相互作用的方式存在差异。
研究童年逆境的维度暴露是否与青少年静息状态功能连接(rsFC)的个体特定模式相关,即当不参与任务时大脑区域之间的同步活动。
设计、地点和参与者:使用大量代表性不足的非洲裔美国青少年的稀疏网络方法进行了一项观察性、基于人群的纵向队列研究。共有 183 名年龄在 15 至 17 岁之间的青少年来自密歇根州底特律、俄亥俄州托莱多和伊利诺伊州芝加哥,他们有资格参加脆弱家庭和儿童福利研究。通过电话和面对面访谈收集了从出生到青少年时期的环境数据,在大学实验室进行了神经影像学数据采集。该研究于 1998 年 2 月 1 日至 2017 年 4 月 26 日进行,数据分析于 2019 年 1 月 3 日至 2020 年 5 月 22 日进行。
根据主要照顾者在儿童 3、5 和 9 岁时的报告,创建了代表暴力暴露和社会剥夺的复合变量。
静息状态功能连接的个体特定网络指标(数据驱动的亚组成员、密度和节点度)侧重于两个静息状态网络(突显网络和默认模式)中的前导感兴趣区域之间的连通性,使用功能磁共振成像进行评估。
在 183 名符合条件的青少年中,175 人(98 名女孩[56%])被纳入分析;平均(SD)年龄为 15.88(0.53)岁,127 名参与者(73%)为非裔美国人。暴力暴露程度较高的青少年处于具有高异质性(连接较少)和低网络密度(稀疏性)的亚组的可能性高 3.06 倍(95%CI,1.17-8.92)。童年期暴力暴露而不是社会剥夺与 rsFC 密度降低相关(β=-0.25;95%CI,-0.41 至 -0.05;P=0.005),与更少的突显网络连接(β=-0.26;95%CI,-0.43 至 -0.08;P=0.005)和突显网络-默认模式连接(β=-0.20;95%CI,-0.38 至 -0.03;P=0.02)相关。暴力暴露与右侧前岛叶(β=-0.29;95%CI,-0.47 至 -0.12;P=0.001)和左侧下顶叶(β=-0.26;95%CI,-0.44 至 -0.09;P=0.003)的节点度相关。
这项研究的结果表明,童年期暴力暴露与青少年神经网络稀疏性有关。一种基于社区检测算法,对儿童逆境一无所知,仅根据 rsFC 模式对暴露于更高暴力的年轻人进行分组。这些发现可能对理解童年逆境的各个维度如何影响个体神经发育具有重要意义。