Suppr超能文献

两种矫治器治疗患者的龈下菌群短期变化:一项纵向研究。

Short-term variation in the subgingival microbiota in two groups of patients treated with clear aligners and vestibular fixed appliances: A longitudinal study.

机构信息

Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):251-260. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12427. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the subgingival microbiological changes during the first six months of therapy with clear aligners (CAs) and fixed appliances (FAs). The null hypothesis was that there would be no microbiological differences between the two.

SETTING/SAMPLE: Two groups of patients to be treated, respectively, with CAs (14 patients; 9 females and 5 males; mean age 21 years ± 0.25) and FAs (13 patients; 8 females and 5 males; mean 14 years ± 0.75) were consecutively recruited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subgingival microbiological samples were obtained at the right upper central incisor and right first molar at four different time points: before appliance fitting (T0), and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T6) thereafter. Total bacterial load (TBL) and counts of the bacteria Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter rectus, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia were determined using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Total bacterial load did not vary in the CA group, while a significant increase was detected after 3 and 6 months of treatment in the FA group. Unlike red complex species, C rectus and F nucleatum were often detected: levels remained stable in the CA group but increased progressively in the FA group.

CONCLUSION

The type of orthodontic appliance influences the subgingival microbiota. TBL increased in the FA group but not in the CA group, although the levels of the individual periodontal pathogenic bacteria species did not significantly increase during the observation period.

摘要

目的

评估在使用透明矫正器(CA)和固定矫正器(FA)治疗的前 6 个月中龈下微生物的变化。零假设是两种方法之间不会存在微生物学差异。

设置/样本:连续招募了两组待治疗的患者,分别使用 CA(14 例患者;9 名女性和 5 名男性;平均年龄 21 岁±0.25 岁)和 FA(13 例患者;8 名女性和 5 名男性;平均年龄 14 岁±0.75 岁)。

材料和方法

在四个不同时间点(佩戴矫治器前(T0),以及 1 个月(T1)、3 个月(T3)和 6 个月(T6)后),从右上中切牙和右上第一磨牙获得龈下微生物样本。使用实时 PCR 测定总细菌负荷(TBL)和伴放线放线杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、核梭杆菌、直肠弯曲菌、齿密螺旋体和福赛坦纳菌的细菌计数。

结果

CA 组的总细菌负荷没有变化,而在 FA 组治疗 3 和 6 个月后则明显增加。与红色复合体物种不同,C 直肠和 F 核梭杆菌经常被检测到:在 CA 组中水平保持稳定,但在 FA 组中则逐渐增加。

结论

正畸矫治器的类型会影响龈下微生物群。FA 组的 TBL 增加,但 CA 组没有增加,尽管在观察期间个别牙周致病菌的水平没有显著增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验