• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用不对称髋臼组件经直接前方入路进行翻修关节成形术。

Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component.

作者信息

Prodinger Peter Michael, Lazic Igor, Horas Konstantin, Burgkart Rainer, von Eisenhart-Rothe Rüdiger, Weissenberger Manuel, Rudert Maximilian, Holzapfel Boris Michael

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Krankenhaus Agatharied, Norbert-Kerkel-Platz, 83734 Hausham, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 21;9(9):3031. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093031.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9093031
PMID:32967075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7564155/
Abstract

Despite increasing numbers of primary hip arthroplasties performed through the direct anterior approach (DAA), there is a lack of literature on DAA revision arthroplasty. The present study was performed in order to evaluate outcomes and revision rates after revision through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed prospectively collected data of 57 patients (61 hips, 43 female, 18 male) who underwent aseptic acetabular component revision through the DAA with the abovementioned implant system between January 2015 and December 2017. The mean follow-up was 40 months (12-56). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All complications were documented and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an estimated five-year implant survival of 97% (confidence interval CI 87-99%). The estimated five-year survival with revision for any cause was 93% (CI 83-98%). The overall revision rate was 6.6% (n = 4). Two patients had to undergo revision due to periprosthetic infection (3.3%). In one patient, the acetabular component was revised due to aseptic loosening four months postoperatively. Another patient suffered from postoperative iliopsoas impingement and was treated successfully by arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy. Two (3.3%) of the revised hips dislocated postoperatively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 (2-66) preoperatively to 86 (38-100) postoperatively ( < 0.001). The hip joint's anatomical center of rotation was restored at a high degree of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that acetabular revision arthroplasty through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation is safe and practicable, resulting in good radiographic and clinical midterm results.

摘要

尽管通过直接前路(DAA)进行的初次髋关节置换术数量不断增加,但关于DAA翻修置换术的文献却很匮乏。本研究旨在评估使用具有可选髓内和髓外固定的不对称髋臼组件通过DAA进行翻修后的疗效和翻修率。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2015年1月至2017年12月期间57例患者(61髋,43例女性,18例男性)的前瞻性收集数据,这些患者通过DAA使用上述植入系统进行了无菌髋臼组件翻修。平均随访时间为40个月(12 - 56个月)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率。记录所有并发症,并在术前和术后评估功能结果。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,估计五年植入物生存率为97%(置信区间CI 87 - 99%)。因任何原因进行翻修的估计五年生存率为93%(CI 83 - 98%)。总体翻修率为6.6%(n = 4)。两名患者因假体周围感染不得不进行翻修(3.3%)。一名患者术后4个月因无菌性松动对髋臼组件进行了翻修。另一名患者术后出现髂腰肌撞击症,通过关节镜下髂腰肌松解术成功治疗。翻修后的髋关节中有2例(3.3%)术后发生脱位。Harris髋关节评分平均从术前的35分(2 - 66分)提高到术后的86分(38 - 100分)(P < 0.001)。髋关节的解剖旋转中心得到了高度精确的恢复。我们的研究结果表明,使用具有可选髓内和髓外固定的不对称髋臼组件通过DAA进行髋臼翻修置换术是安全可行的,可产生良好的影像学和临床中期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/d0192f425642/jcm-09-03031-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/b273c0c407f6/jcm-09-03031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/455764c653ba/jcm-09-03031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/779a07059602/jcm-09-03031-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/8ebe45c00224/jcm-09-03031-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/2535b14d76d9/jcm-09-03031-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/7889c9b72756/jcm-09-03031-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/d0192f425642/jcm-09-03031-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/b273c0c407f6/jcm-09-03031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/455764c653ba/jcm-09-03031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/779a07059602/jcm-09-03031-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/8ebe45c00224/jcm-09-03031-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/2535b14d76d9/jcm-09-03031-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/7889c9b72756/jcm-09-03031-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a596/7564155/d0192f425642/jcm-09-03031-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component.采用不对称髋臼组件经直接前方入路进行翻修关节成形术。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 21;9(9):3031. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093031.
2
Acetabular Revision With Intramedullary and Extramedullary Iliac Fixation for Pelvic Discontinuity.髋臼重建伴髓内和髓外髂骨固定治疗骨盆不连续。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3679-3685.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.067. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.在翻修全髋关节置换术中无骨水泥植入髋臼假体的高位放置。平均十年后的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):469-80. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00004.
4
Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.髋臼骨折手术治疗后的全髋关节置换术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Sep;80(9):1295-305. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199809000-00008.
5
Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study.髋臼翻修采用非骨水泥型大直径假体:一项十至十六年随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):496-499. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups.超大杯臼杯在髋关节翻修术中的中期随访。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):811-818. doi: 10.1111/os.12522. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
8
Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.巨型髋臼组件在髋关节翻修术中的固定、存活和脱位。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):543-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00758.
9
Surgical Management of Iliopsoas Impingement With Combined Acetabular Revision and Partial Psoas Tenotomy.联合髋臼翻修术与部分腰大肌肌腱切断术治疗髂腰肌撞击症的手术管理
Cureus. 2021 Feb 7;13(2):e13193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13193.
10
The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.采用螺钉固定的哈里斯-加兰特多孔涂层髋臼组件。一项平均十年的随访研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):66-73. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199901000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and outcomes of bikini-incision DAA for hip arthroplasty with large acetabular cups (≥56 mm): A single-surgeon series of 215 cases.使用大型髋臼杯(≥56mm)进行髋关节置换术的比基尼切口直接前路入路的安全性和结果:单术者的215例病例系列
SICOT J. 2025;11:25. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025021. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
A systematic review on revision total hip arthroplasty employing the direct anterior approach.一项关于采用直接前路入路进行全髋关节翻修置换术的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05727-2.
3
Functional Outcome after Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty (DAA-THA) for Coxa Profunda and Protrusio Acetabuli-A Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Acetabular Revision With Intramedullary and Extramedullary Iliac Fixation for Pelvic Discontinuity.髋臼重建伴髓内和髓外髂骨固定治疗骨盆不连续。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3679-3685.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.067. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Is revision total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach feasible?经直接前入路行全髋关节翻修术是否可行?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Aug;140(8):1125-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03469-5. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Acetabular reconstruction with a custom-made triflange acetabular component through direct anterior approach - A case report.
髋臼内陷和髋臼前突患者行直接前路全髋关节置换术(DAA-THA)后的功能结局——一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4596. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164596.
4
A low dislocation rate after revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the anterior approach.经前路行翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位率较低。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan 5;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00159-y.
5
Acetabular defect management and revision arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.经直接前入路行髋臼缺损处理和翻修关节成形术。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jun;34(3):203-217. doi: 10.1007/s00064-022-00767-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
The Analysis of Polyethylene Hip Joint Endoprostheses Strength Parameters Changes after Use inside the Human Body.人体内使用后聚乙烯髋关节假体强度参数变化分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 22;14(22):7091. doi: 10.3390/ma14227091.
7
Short stem hip arthroplasty via the minimally invasive direct anterior approach.微创直接前侧入路的短柄髋关节置换术。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Aug;33(4):288-303. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00723-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
8
Custom Made Monoflange Acetabular Components for the Treatment of Paprosky Type III Defects.定制单翼髋臼组件用于治疗Paprosky III型缺损。
J Pers Med. 2021 Apr 8;11(4):283. doi: 10.3390/jpm11040283.
9
Femoral Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed through the Interval of the Direct Anterior Approach.经直接前路间隙行股骨翻修全髋关节置换术。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 18;10(2):337. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020337.
经直接前路入路使用定制三翼髋臼组件进行髋臼重建——病例报告
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;11(Suppl 2):S211-S213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Association Between Surgical Approach and Major Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术后手术入路与主要手术并发症的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1070-1076. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0785.
5
A Comparison of Risk of Dislocation and Cause-Specific Revision Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approach Following Elective Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.直接前侧入路与后侧入路在全髋关节置换术后非骨水泥固定假体的脱位风险和特定原因翻修比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1651-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.033. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Periprosthetic Fractures and Conversion Hip Replacement Using the Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip.髋关节周围骨折与采用髋关节直接前方入路的髋关节置换翻修术
Instr Course Lect. 2020;69:67-84.
7
Extensile Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip for Severe Acetabular Defects.用于严重髋臼缺损的髋关节延伸直接前路入路
Instr Course Lect. 2020;69:15-24.
8
Mid-term Follow-up of the Direct Anterior Approach in Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Reconstruction Cage With Impaction Grafting.直接前方入路髋臼翻修中使用重建笼打压植骨的中期随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1339-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Posterior versus direct anterior approach in revision hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type plate.使用Kerboull型钢板进行髋关节翻修置换术时后侧入路与直接前侧入路的比较
SICOT J. 2020;6:2. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2019040. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
The direct anterior approach: treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty.直接前方入路:使用两阶段翻修关节成形术治疗髋关节假体周围关节感染。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Feb;140(2):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03317-1. Epub 2019 Dec 3.