Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):1242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041242.
While adolescent health literacy has gained momentum, it is under-researched from a cross-cultural perspective. This study aims to compare health literacy among two cultural groups of secondary students in Beijing and Melbourne. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 770 students from five secondary schools in Beijing and Melbourne. A self-administered questionnaire was designed to collect information on health literacy (the eight-item health literacy assessment tool (HLAT-8), the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) and the 47-item Health Literacy Survey (HLS-47)), its antecedents and health outcomes. Overall, students' health literacy in Melbourne (n = 120) was higher than that in Beijing (n = 650): 28.25 ± 6.00 versus 26.37 ± 5.89 (HLAT-8); and 4.13 ± 1.73 versus 3.65 ± 1.64 (NVS). The proportion of students with low health literacy varied by instruments, representing 23.7-32.2% in Melbourne and 29.0%-45.5% in Beijing. In both cultural groups, students' self-efficacy, social support, and perceptions of school environment were associated with their health literacy, which in turn predicted their health behaviours, patient-provider communication and health status. Given the nature of our study design and small samples, a cautious conclusion would be that adolescent health literacy is sensitive to the broad cultural context and might be an interactive outcome influenced by an individual's health skills and the social environment. Particularly, creating a supportive school environment is critical to develop adolescent health literacy that would eventually contribute to better health outcomes.
虽然青少年健康素养已经引起了关注,但从跨文化的角度来看,对其的研究还不够充分。本研究旨在比较北京和墨尔本两个文化群体的中学生的健康素养。采用横断面研究方法,在北京和墨尔本的五所中学中招募了 770 名学生。设计了一份自填式问卷,以收集健康素养(八条目健康素养评估工具(HLAT-8)、最新生命体征(NVS)和 47 条目健康素养调查(HLS-47))、其前因和健康结果等信息。总体而言,墨尔本(n = 120)学生的健康素养高于北京(n = 650):28.25 ± 6.00 比 26.37 ± 5.89(HLAT-8);4.13 ± 1.73 比 3.65 ± 1.64(NVS)。使用不同工具,墨尔本和北京的低健康素养学生比例分别为 23.7%-32.2%和 29.0%-45.5%。在两个文化群体中,学生的自我效能感、社会支持和对学校环境的感知都与他们的健康素养相关,而健康素养又反过来预测了他们的健康行为、医患沟通和健康状况。鉴于本研究设计的性质和小样本量,一个谨慎的结论是,青少年健康素养对广泛的文化背景敏感,并且可能是一个受个体健康技能和社会环境影响的互动结果。特别是,营造一个支持性的学校环境对于培养青少年健康素养至关重要,这最终将有助于改善健康结果。