Lu Haishan, Guo Jian, Hong Xudong, Chen Aifen, Zhang Xudong, Shen Shengxian
Department of Dermatology, PLA 903 Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22256. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022256.
Striae distensae (SD) are common and aesthetically undesirable dermal lesions. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies in treating striae distensae using network meta-analysis.
A systematic search of electronic databases up to December 1, 2019 was conducted. Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) examining the effectiveness of different methods in treating striae distensae were included. The primary outcomes are clinical effective rate and patient's satisfaction degree. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Network meta-analysis was based on Bayesian framework.
Fourteen trails that met the criteria with 651 subjects were included. The results of the network meta-analysis show that topical tretinoin combined bipolar radiofrequency showed the highest probability of being the best method to improve the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction rate of treating SD (84.5% and 95.7% respectively), closely followed by bipolar radiofrequency (75.3% and 84.3% respectively). Among laser treatment, CO2 fractional laser is superior to other lasers in the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction (72.0% and 58.1% respectively). Statistics showed the topical tretinoin was the worst-performing option in improving the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction rate of SD treatment (5.4% and 5.1% respectively).
Based on the results of network meta-analysis, we recommend treating striae distensae with bipolar radio frequency combined topical tretinoin. The commonly used CO2 fractional laser can be considered as alternative treatment candidate. Additional large-scale RCTs are necessary to obtain more precise estimates of their relative efficacy.
膨胀纹(SD)是常见且影响美观的皮肤病变。本研究旨在通过网状Meta分析全面评估不同疗法治疗膨胀纹的有效性。
对截至2019年12月1日的电子数据库进行系统检索。纳入考察不同方法治疗膨胀纹有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为临床有效率和患者满意度。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。网状Meta分析基于贝叶斯框架。
纳入14项符合标准的试验,共651名受试者。网状Meta分析结果显示,外用维甲酸联合双极射频改善膨胀纹临床有效性和患者满意率的最佳概率最高(分别为84.5%和95.7%),双极射频紧随其后(分别为75.3%和84.3%)。在激光治疗中,二氧化碳点阵激光在临床有效性和患者满意度方面优于其他激光(分别为72.0%和58.1%)。统计显示,外用维甲酸在改善膨胀纹临床有效性和患者满意率方面表现最差(分别为5.4%和5.1%)。
基于网状Meta分析结果,我们推荐用双极射频联合外用维甲酸治疗膨胀纹。常用的二氧化碳点阵激光可作为替代治疗选择。需要更多大规模RCT以更精确地估计它们的相对疗效。