• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量驾驶员感知:眼动追踪与自动化道路场景感知相结合。

Measuring Driver Perception: Combining Eye-Tracking and Automated Road Scene Perception.

机构信息

541087 Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):714-731. doi: 10.1177/0018720820959958. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/0018720820959958
PMID:32993382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9136390/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how well gaze behavior can indicate driver awareness of individual road users when related to the vehicle's road scene perception.

BACKGROUND

An appropriate method is required to identify how driver gaze reveals awareness of other road users.

METHOD

We developed a recognition-based method for labeling of driver situation awareness (SA) in a vehicle with road-scene perception and eye tracking. Thirteen drivers performed 91 left turns on complex urban intersections and identified images of encountered road users among distractor images.

RESULTS

Drivers fixated within 2° for 72.8% of relevant and 27.8% of irrelevant road users and were able to recognize 36.1% of the relevant and 19.4% of irrelevant road users one min after leaving the intersection. Gaze behavior could predict road user relevance but not the outcome of the recognition task. Unexpectedly, 18% of road users observed beyond 10° were recognized.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite suboptimal psychometric properties leading to low recognition rates, our recognition task could identify awareness of individual road users during left turn maneuvers. Perception occurred at gaze angles well beyond 2°, which means that fixation locations are insufficient for awareness monitoring.

APPLICATION

Findings can be used in driver attention and awareness modelling, and design of gaze-based driver support systems.

摘要

目的

研究当驾驶员注视行为与车辆道路场景感知相关时,其能在何种程度上反映对个别道路使用者的意识。

背景

需要采用适当的方法来识别驾驶员的注视行为如何揭示其对其他道路使用者的意识。

方法

我们开发了一种基于识别的方法,用于在具有道路场景感知和眼动追踪功能的车辆中对驾驶员情境意识(SA)进行标记。13 名驾驶员在复杂的城市路口完成了 91 次左转,并在干扰图像中识别出遇到的道路使用者的图像。

结果

驾驶员对相关道路使用者的注视时间为 72.8%,注视角度为 2°以内;对不相关道路使用者的注视时间为 27.8%,注视角度为 2°以内;在离开交叉口 1 分钟后,驾驶员能够识别出 36.1%的相关道路使用者和 19.4%的不相关道路使用者。注视行为可以预测道路使用者的相关性,但不能预测识别任务的结果。出乎意料的是,有 18%的观察角度超过 10°的道路使用者被识别出来。

结论

尽管识别任务的心理测量学特性不佳,导致识别率较低,但仍可识别驾驶员在左转操作期间对个别道路使用者的意识。感知发生在注视角度远超过 2°的地方,这意味着注视点位置不足以进行意识监测。

应用

研究结果可用于驾驶员注意力和意识建模,以及基于注视的驾驶员支持系统的设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/2e18ec27e32e/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/ae4dbd0056ed/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/69809257bc62/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/869ca734a1e0/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/c128211ccce5/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/59b7b83d22e0/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/ea0f99438888/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/2be3df7e47c1/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/e4b0896451f5/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/86cf3acfccd6/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/00a5ffa8a88e/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/2e18ec27e32e/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/ae4dbd0056ed/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/69809257bc62/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/869ca734a1e0/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/c128211ccce5/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/59b7b83d22e0/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/ea0f99438888/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/2be3df7e47c1/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/e4b0896451f5/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/86cf3acfccd6/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/00a5ffa8a88e/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec6/9136390/2e18ec27e32e/10.1177_0018720820959958-fig11.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Driver Perception: Combining Eye-Tracking and Automated Road Scene Perception.测量驾驶员感知:眼动追踪与自动化道路场景感知相结合。
Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):714-731. doi: 10.1177/0018720820959958. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.利用眼动追踪技术研究接管前视觉接触对自动驾驶中情境意识的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
Gaze and Eye Tracking: Techniques and Applications in ADAS.凝视和眼动追踪:ADAS 中的技术与应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 14;19(24):5540. doi: 10.3390/s19245540.
4
Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.使用事件数据记录器分析交叉路口碰撞前驾驶员的避险操作。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S182-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1066500.
5
The driver's instantaneous situation awareness when the alarm rings during the take-over of vehicle control in automated driving.自动驾驶中接管车辆控制时警报响起时驾驶员的即时情境意识。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(8):478-482. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2122714. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Road user hazard perception tests: A systematic review of current methodologies.道路使用者危险感知测试:当前方法学的系统回顾。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:309-333. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
Identifying objective behavioural measures of expert driver situation awareness.识别专家驾驶员情境意识的客观行为测量方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106465. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106465. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
8
A context-aware driver model for determining recommended speed in blind intersection situations.一种用于确定盲区内推荐速度的上下文感知驾驶员模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106447. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106447. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
9
Hey, watch where you're going! An on-road study of driver scanning failures towards pedestrians and cyclists.嘿,小心看路!一项关于驾驶员对行人和骑车人扫视失败的道路研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Nov;162:106380. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106380. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Driver Take-Over Behaviour Study Based on Gaze Focalization and Vehicle Data in CARLA Simulator.基于 CARLA 模拟器中的注视焦点和车辆数据的驾驶员接管行为研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;22(24):9993. doi: 10.3390/s22249993.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile Reading Attention of College Students in Different Reading Environments: An Eye-Tracking Study.不同阅读环境下大学生的移动阅读注意力:一项眼动追踪研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;15(7):953. doi: 10.3390/bs15070953.
2
Analyzing Factors Influencing Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles-A Survey.分析影响自动驾驶汽车情境意识的因素——综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;23(8):4075. doi: 10.3390/s23084075.

本文引用的文献

1
Driver Behavior and Performance with Augmented Reality Pedestrian Collision Warning: An Outdoor User Study.增强现实行人碰撞警告下的驾驶员行为和表现:一项户外用户研究。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Apr;24(4):1515-1524. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2793680.
2
More than the Useful Field: Considering peripheral vision in driving.超越有用视野:考虑驾驶中的周边视野。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:316-325. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Exploring schema-driven differences in situation awareness between road users: an on-road study of driver, cyclist and motorcyclist situation awareness.
探索道路使用者之间情境意识中模式驱动的差异:一项关于驾驶员、骑自行车者和骑摩托车者情境意识的实地研究。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(2):191-209. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.867077. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
4
rTMS for Tinnitus.重复经颅磁刺激治疗耳鸣
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 18;6:1. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00001. eCollection 2012.
5
Scene memory is more detailed than you think: the role of categories in visual long-term memory.场景记忆比你想象的更详细:类别在视觉长期记忆中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1551-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797610385359. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
6
Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects.概念独特性支持对真实世界物体的详细视觉长期记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):558-78. doi: 10.1037/a0019165.
7
Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.物体视觉记忆中的场景和位置特异性
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):58-69. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.58.
8
Dissociation of implicit and explicit knowledge in a case of psychogenic retrograde amnesia.一例心因性逆行性遗忘症中内隐知识与外显知识的分离
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Mar;2(2):146-58. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700001004.
9
Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation.航空领域态势感知错误的来源。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Jun;67(6):507-12.
10
The basic driver error: late detection.基本的驾驶员失误:检测延迟。
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1281-90. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925332.