Schumann Simone, Gschmeidler Brigitte, Pellegrini Giuseppe
Open Science - Life Sciences in Dialogue, Vienna, Austria.
Observa - Science in Society, Vicenza, Italy.
J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):67-80. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00486-0. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
The objective of this article is to present various views from different groups of citizens on the topic of whole genome sequencing (WGS). Sixteen focus groups were carried out in Italy and Austria which aimed at reflecting on the question of how to ensure that the implementation of WGS into the clinic is relevant and responsive to the needs of all members of society. In the qualitative analysis of the focus groups, three key themes (knowing, relationships and trust) were investigated. Although the majority of the participants favoured a person-centred care approach, we also found more radical perspectives in the relationship theme. This includes a self-centred orientation in which health care institutions should be prepared to integrate self-interpretation efforts of citizens and develop strategies to deal with them. Different attitudes towards getting to know genetic information (knowing) and varied approaches to decision-making for or against the use of WGS were observed. Personal capacities, in particular those to handle medical information, were emphasized as key factors. This means that it is important not to connect the desire not to know with a rejection of the technology per se but rather to support information and consultancy processes that effectively involve citizens. Concerning the third theme, we have underlined the important role of mistrust in addition to trust because it mostly points to areas or conditions considered problematic. Thus, mistrust is also a way to articulate critique, for example, of the profit-making with patient data, that has to be taken seriously by governance.
本文的目的是呈现不同公民群体对全基因组测序(WGS)这一主题的各种观点。在意大利和奥地利开展了16个焦点小组,旨在思考如何确保将WGS应用于临床与社会所有成员的需求相关并做出响应。在对焦点小组的定性分析中,研究了三个关键主题(认知、关系和信任)。尽管大多数参与者赞成以患者为中心的护理方法,但我们在关系主题中也发现了更激进的观点。这包括一种以自我为中心的取向,即医疗机构应准备好整合公民的自我解读努力并制定应对策略。观察到对了解基因信息(认知)的不同态度以及对于支持或反对使用WGS的不同决策方法。个人能力,尤其是处理医疗信息的能力,被强调为关键因素。这意味着重要的是不要将不想了解的愿望与对技术本身的拒绝联系起来,而是要支持有效地让公民参与进来的信息和咨询过程。关于第三个主题,除了信任之外,我们还强调了不信任的重要作用,因为它大多指向被认为有问题的领域或情况。因此,不信任也是表达批评的一种方式,例如对利用患者数据盈利的批评,治理必须认真对待这种批评。