• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活目的与运动认知风险综合征:来自两个全国性样本的可复制证据。

Purpose in Life and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Replicable Evidence from Two National Samples.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

Euromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):381-388. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16852. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.16852
PMID:32997804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902315/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome is characterized by cognitive complaints and slow gait speed in the absence of dementia. Consistent evidence indicates that it predicts dementia and premature mortality. Less is known about its antecedents, particularly the role of psychological function. Purpose in life is an aspect of well-being that reflects a goal-oriented and -driven life that has been implicated in cognitive aging. We aimed to examine the cross-sectional association between purpose in life and MCR and to test the hypothesis that purpose is associated with a lower risk of new cases of MCR over an up to 12-year follow-up.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional and longitudinal multi-cohort design.

SETTING

Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 6,785 individuals from the HRS and 5,665 from the NHATS.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants reported on their purpose in life and cognitive complaints and completed a walking speed assessment. Cognitive complaints and walking speed were assessed again up to 12 years later in HRS and up to 7 years later in NHATS.

RESULTS

Higher purpose in life was associated with a 33% lower risk of MCR concurrently (meta-analytic odds ratio = .75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .62-.90; P = .002) and an about 26% lower risk of incident MCR longitudinally (meta-analytic hazard ratio = .77; 95% CI = .70-.84; P < .001). These associations were significant in each sample, were independent of sociodemographic covariates, and persisted after controlling for personality and health-related factors (depressive symptoms, physical activity, disease burden).

CONCLUSION

Purpose in life is associated with a lower risk of incident MCR, an association that was replicated in two independent samples. Purpose is a malleable aspect of psychological function that is a promising target of intervention for healthier cognitive aging.

摘要

背景/目的:运动认知风险(MCR)综合征的特征是认知主诉和步态缓慢,而无痴呆。一致的证据表明,它可预测痴呆和过早死亡。关于其前兆的了解较少,特别是心理功能的作用。生活目的是幸福感的一个方面,反映了有目标和有动力的生活,这与认知老化有关。我们旨在检验生活目的与 MCR 的横断面关联,并检验假设,即生活目的与较低的 MCR 新发病例风险相关,随访时间长达 12 年。

设计

横断面和纵向多队列设计。

地点

健康与退休研究(HRS)和国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)。

参与者

共有来自 HRS 的 6785 人和来自 NHATS 的 5665 人。

测量

参与者报告了他们的生活目的和认知主诉,并完成了步行速度评估。在 HRS 中,认知主诉和步行速度在最多 12 年内再次进行评估,在 NHATS 中,在最多 7 年内再次进行评估。

结果

较高的生活目的与同时发生的 MCR 风险降低 33%相关(荟萃分析优势比=0.75;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.62-0.90;P=0.002),与发生 MCR 的风险降低 26%相关(荟萃分析风险比=0.77;95%CI为 0.70-0.84;P <0.001)。这些关联在每个样本中均具有统计学意义,独立于社会人口统计学协变量,并且在控制人格和与健康相关的因素(抑郁症状、身体活动、疾病负担)后仍然存在。

结论

生活目的与发生 MCR 的风险降低相关,这一关联在两个独立的样本中得到了复制。目的是心理功能的一个可塑方面,是更健康的认知老化的有希望的干预靶点。

相似文献

1
Purpose in Life and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Replicable Evidence from Two National Samples.生活目的与运动认知风险综合征:来自两个全国性样本的可复制证据。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):381-388. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16852. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
The Association Between Subjective Age and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Results From a Population-Based Cohort Study.主观年龄与运动认知风险综合征的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Nov 15;76(10):2023-2028. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab047.
3
Personality and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.人格与运动认知风险综合征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):803-808. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16282. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
4
Baseline Association of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome With Sustained Attention, Memory, and Global Cognition.运动认知风险综合征与持续性注意力、记忆力和整体认知的基线关联。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
5
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome is associated with processing speed and executive function, but not delayed free recall memory: The Korean frailty and aging cohort study (KFACS).运动认知风险综合征与处理速度和执行功能有关,但与延迟自由回忆记忆无关:韩国衰弱与老龄化队列研究(KFACS)。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Mar-Apr;87:103990. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.103990. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
Facets of conscientiousness and motoric cognitive risk syndrome.尽责性的各个方面与运动认知风险综合征。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jul;151:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.050. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
Risk factors associated with the Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome: A meta-analysis of data from a cross-national study.与运动认知风险综合征相关的风险因素:一项跨国研究数据的荟萃分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep;72(9):2656-2666. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19032. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
8
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident dementia: results from a population-based prospective and observational cohort study.运动认知风险综合征与痴呆症发病风险:一项基于人群的前瞻性观察队列研究结果。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Mar;27(3):468-474. doi: 10.1111/ene.14093. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
9
Association of C-Reactive Protein and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.社区老年人 C 反应蛋白与运动认知风险综合征的关系:中国健康与养老追踪调查。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(9):1090-1095. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1678-3.
10
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome, incident cognitive impairment and morphological brain abnormalities: Systematic review and meta-analysis.运动认知风险综合征、新发认知障碍与形态学脑异常:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Maturitas. 2019 May;123:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of screening tools for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community settings.社区环境中运动性认知风险综合征筛查工具的开发与验证
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):105433. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.105433.
2
Psychological characteristics and functional abilities in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints: A potential new target for early intervention.有主观认知主诉的老年人的心理特征和功能能力:早期干预的一个潜在新靶点。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2025 Mar 24:100066. doi: 10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100066.
3
Association of motoric cognitive risk syndrome with depression in older adults: a meta-analysis and systematic review of cross-sectional and cohort studies.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Personality Traits on Risk of Incident Pre-dementia Syndromes.人格特质对发生前驱痴呆综合征风险的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1554-1559. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16424. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Integration of two early harbingers of dementia in older adults.运动认知风险综合征:老年人群中两种痴呆早期先兆的整合。
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Mar;58:101022. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101022. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
3
Mild behavioral impairment is associated with β-amyloid but not tau or neurodegeneration in cognitively intact elderly individuals.
运动认知风险综合征与老年人抑郁的关联:横断面和队列研究的荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05507-y.
4
Peak expiratory flow predicts motoric cognitive risk syndrome: A cohort study.呼气峰值流速可预测运动性认知风险综合征:一项队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):887-893. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19210. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Effects of physical and psychological multimorbidity on the risk of dementia: multinational prospective cohorts and a meta-analysis.躯体和心理共病对痴呆风险的影响:多国前瞻性队列研究和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03642-2.
6
Association between pain interference and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults: a population-based cohort study.老年人疼痛干扰与运动认知风险综合征的关系:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 17;24(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04974-7.
7
Purpose in Life and Cognitive Function: Evidence for Momentary Associations in Daily Life.生活目的与认知功能:日常生活中瞬间关联的证据
Innov Aging. 2024 Feb 15;8(3):igae018. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae018. eCollection 2024.
8
Purpose in life and cognitive health: a 28-year prospective study.生活目的与认知健康:一项28年的前瞻性研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Oct;36(10):956-964. doi: 10.1017/S1041610224000383. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
9
Association of cardiometabolic multimorbidity with motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.老年人心脏代谢多重疾病与运动性认知风险综合征的关联
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Nov 5;15(4):e12491. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12491. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
10
Informant-rated change in personality traits, psychological distress, well-being, and social connection with dementia.患者报告的人格特质、心理困扰、幸福感和社会联系变化与痴呆症的关系。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Dec;115:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105218. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
轻度行为障碍与β-淀粉样蛋白有关,但与认知正常的老年人的tau 蛋白或神经退行性变无关。
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Jan;16(1):192-199. doi: 10.1002/alz.12007.
4
Personality and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.人格与运动认知风险综合征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):803-808. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16282. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
5
Surviving and Thriving: Fundamental Social Motives Provide Purpose in Life.生存与繁荣:基本社会动机赋予生活意义。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):944-960. doi: 10.1177/0146167219883604. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Cohort Profile: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).队列简介:美国国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1044-1045g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz109.
7
Purpose and mastery as predictors of perceived health and substance use problems.目的和掌握程度是预测感知健康和物质使用问题的指标。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Jul;47(6):1514-1529. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22200. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Effects of psychosocial interventions on meaning and purpose in adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理社会干预对癌症成人意义和目的的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2383-2393. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32078. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Cortical β-amyloid burden, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cognitive status: the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.皮质β-淀粉样蛋白负担、神经精神症状和认知状况:明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所老龄化研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 28;9(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0456-z.
10
Purpose in Life Protects Against Cognitive Decline Among Older Adults.生活目的可预防老年人认知能力下降。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;27(6):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 19.