Nicholas Lucy
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Transgend. 2018 Oct 8;20(2-3):169-180. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2018.1505576. eCollection 2019.
Alongside the growth in visibility of gender identities and presentations such as genderqueer, non-binary and gender neutral, there is ridicule and backlash in wider culture, as well as more subtle invisibility and misgendering. While there exists social psychology research about negative and positive attitudes to trans people, this is restricted to those whose gender identity is at odds with their sex assigned at birth, and who identify with binary gender. Social psychology has extended to the more subtle workings of transphobia, but there is little consideration of the distinctiveness of attitudes and responses to those whose genders cannot be attributed in binary ways, and thus how these may be challenged. In keeping with the methods of social theory, this article brings together a diverse and complementary range of conceptual fields in new ways to diagnose a novel cause and solution to these negative attitudes. Using queer theory, feminist ethics, and empirical studies in post-tolerance sociology and social psychology, it argues that negative social responses to genderqueerness stem not only from overt prejudice in the form of transphobia but from binary genderism, the conviction that there are only two genders. This article proposes fostering greater diversity-literacy and empathy for difference as a more effective approach than minority identity-based 'prejudice reduction' approaches. A norm-critical approach to deconstructing gender norms is proposed, thus fostering positive attitudes to genderqueerness. It is therefore demonstrated how best to foster enabling social contexts for genderqueerness, with positive implications for the physical and social health and wellbeing of gender variant people. This approach can be applied in organizations, institutions, and by service providers who interact with genderqueer individuals, in that it can inform a shift to approaching diversity positively in ways that are not restricted to pre-determined and binary identity categories.
随着性别酷儿、非二元性别和性别中立等性别认同及表现形式的可见度不断提高,在更广泛的文化中存在着嘲笑和抵制,以及更微妙的忽视和性别错称现象。虽然存在关于对跨性别者的消极和积极态度的社会心理学研究,但这仅限于那些性别认同与出生时被指定的性别不一致且认同二元性别的人。社会心理学已经扩展到对恐跨症更微妙的作用机制的研究,但很少考虑对那些性别无法以二元方式归类的人的态度和反应的独特性,以及如何对这些态度和反应提出挑战。与社会理论的方法一致,本文以新的方式将各种不同且互补的概念领域结合起来,以诊断这些消极态度的新原因及解决方案。运用酷儿理论、女性主义伦理学以及后宽容社会学和社会心理学的实证研究,本文认为社会对性别酷儿的消极反应不仅源于以恐跨症形式存在的公开偏见,还源于二元性别主义,即认为只有两种性别的信念。本文提出培养更高的多元文化素养和对差异的同理心,这是一种比基于少数群体身份的“减少偏见”方法更有效的途径。本文提出一种规范批判的方法来解构性别规范,从而培养对性别酷儿的积极态度。因此,本文展示了如何最好地营造有利于性别酷儿的社会环境,这对性别变异者的身心健康和幸福具有积极影响。这种方法可应用于与性别酷儿个体互动的组织、机构和服务提供者,因为它可以促使人们转向以积极的方式对待多样性,而不限于预先确定的二元身份类别。